Akademik Girişimcilik Literatürünün Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Girişimcilik türlerinden biri olan akademik girişimcilik son yıllarda literatürde sıklıkla çalışılan bir kavram olmuştur. Bu araştırmanın amacı, akademik girişimcilik konusunda uluslararası alanyazındaki makalelerin muhtelif parametrelerle bibliyometrik analizinin gerçekleştirilmesidir. Bu amaç çerçevesinde Web of Science veri tabanında yayımlanmış makaleler incelenerek elde edilen veriler Vosviewer yazılımı ile haritalandırılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda akademik girişimcilik ile ilgili en fazla makalenin yayımlandığı dergi “Journal of Technology Transfer”, en fazla atıf alan dergi “Research Policy” olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Atıf sayısı olarak Etzkowitz (2003)’ün araştırması en çok atıf alan makaledir. Ortak atıf ağında en sık atıf alan araştırmacının ise Shane (2004) olduğu saptanmıştır. Araştırmanın bu bulguları, girişimcilik alanında etkin rol alarak süreçlerini geliştirmek isteyen akademisyenler ve akademik girişimciliği teşvik etme noktasında ilgili olan kurum, kuruluşlar ve politika yapıcılar için büyük önem arz etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Girişimcilik
• Akademik Girişimcilik
• Bibliyometrik Analiz

Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Entrepreneurship Literature

Öz

Academic entrepreneurship, one of the types of entrepreneurship, has been a frequently studied concept in the literature in recent years. The purpose of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of articles on academic entrepreneurship in the global literature utilizing various parameters. For this purpose, the data obtained by examining the articles published in the Web of Science database were mapped with Vosviewer software. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the journal in which the most articles about academic entrepreneurship were published was “Journal of Technology Transfer”, and the journal with the most citations was “Research Policy.” As for the number of citations, Etzkowitz's (2003) research is the most cited article. It has been determined that Shane (2004) is the most frequently cited researcher in the common citation network. These findings of the research are of great importance for academicians who want to improve their processes by taking an active role in the field of entrepreneurship and for institutions, organizations and policy makers who are related to the promotion of academic entrepreneurship.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Entrepreneurship
• Academic Entrepreneurship
• Bibliometric Analysis.

Kaynakça

1. Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408‒422.
2. Acs, Z. J. & Audretsch, D. B. (1991). Innovation and Technological Change: An Overview, in Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch, eds., Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
3. Acs, Z. J. & Audretsch, D. B. (1991). R&D, Firm Size, and Innovative Activity, in Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch, eds., Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
4. Al, U., & Tonta, Y. (2004). Atıf analizi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphanecilik Bölümü tezlerinde atıf yapılan kaynaklar. Bilgi Dünyası, 5 (1), 19-47.
5. Ala, T. & Uğuz, S. (2021). Türkiye’de bölgesel kalkınmanın girişimcilik, inovasyon ve ar-ge çalışmalarıyla ilişkisinin bibliyometrik analizi ve LDA MALLET uygulaması. Erzincan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20. Bölge Bilimi ve Planlama Kongresi Özel Sayısı , 13-29.
6. Aldridge, T. T., D. Audretsch, S. Desai and V., & Nadella, V. (2014). Scientist entrepreneurship across scientific fields. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(6), 819‒835.
7. Ardito, L., Scuotto, V., Del Giudice, M., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of research on Big Data analytics for business and management. Management Decision. 1993-2009.
8. Ayaz, A., & Çelik, K. (2022). Mobil öğrenmenin bibliyometrik analizi. Sosyal, Beşerî ve İdari Bilimler Alanında Uluslararası Araştırmalar X, (içinde), 305-320. Eğitim Yayınevi.

9. Aydınoğlu, A. U. (2021). Girişimcilik üzerine akademik çalışmalar: 2000-2019 yıllarının bibliyometrik analizi, Türkiye’de yenilik tabanlı girişimcilik, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
10. Balıkoğlu, A., Oflaz, M., Acun, A. & Avcikurt, C. (2017). Girişimcilik konulu lisansüstü tezlere yönelik bibliyometrik bir analiz, 8. Uluslararası Girişimcilik Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Kırgızistan Türkiye-Manas Üniversitesi, 683-696.
11. Ball, R. (2018). Bibliometric Methods: Basic Principles and Indicators. Ball R. (Ed), An Introduction to Bibliometrics, 15-56, Chandos Publishing.
12. Barth, T. (2013), Academic Entrepreneur, Academic Entrepreneurship, Carayannis, Elias G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1-18, New York: Springer Reference.
13. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89.
14. Bilge, E.Ç. & Yaman, H. (2022). Research trends analysis using text mining in construction management: 2000–2020. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29 (8). 3210-3233.
15. Bozeman, B., Fay, D. & Slade, C.P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 1–67.
16. Bozkurt, Ö. Ç., ve Çetin, A. (2016). Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi’nin bibliyometrik analizi. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 11 (2), 229-263.
17. Brent G.,, & Magnus H. (2013). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property, Research Policy, 32 (4), 639-658.
18. Cansız, M., (2016), Türkiye’de Akademik Girişimcilik, Kalkınma Bakanlığı, Ankara.
19. Cantu-Ortiz, F. J., Galeano, N., Mora-Castro, P., ve Fangmeyer Jr, J. (2017). Spreading academic entrepreneurship: made in mexico. Business Horizons, 60(4), 541-550.
20. Daniels, G. and Hofer, C., (1993). Characteristics of successful and unsuccessfulnentrepreneurial faculty and their innovative research teams. In N. Churchill, S. Birley, W. Bygrave, J. Doutriaux, E. Gatewood, F. Hoy and W. Wetzel (Eds) Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 598-609.
21. de Silva, L. Ranmuthumalie; Uyrarra, Elvira; Oakey, Ray (2011). Academic entrepreneurship in a resource contrained environment: Diversification and synergistic effects, Manchester Business School Working Paper, No. 616, The University of Manchester, Manchester Business School, Manchester.
22. Demir, E. (2022). Yerel yazındaki girişimcilik makalelerinin bibliyometrik analizi: 2015-2020 yılları aralığı. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Kastamonu: Kastamonu Üniversitesi.
23. Dickson, K., Coles, A. & Smith, H. (1998). Science in the marketplace: the role of the scientific entrepreneur. In: During, W. & Oakey, R. (eds.) New Technology based Firms in the 1990s. London: Paul Chapman.
24. Doğan, M. E. (2020). Teknokentler ve girişimcilik ilişkisi üzerine bibliyometrik analiz çalışması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Bursa :Uludağ Üniversitesi.
25. Domingues, M., Santana, H. E. Ruzene, D. & Silva, Daniel. (2022). Systematic literature review on academic entrepreneurship by bibliometric metadata analysis. International Journal of Social Science Studies. 10, 33-53.
26. Drucker, P. F., (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Harper&Row Publishers, New York.
27. Durán-Sánchez, A., Peris-Ortiz, M., Álvarez-García, J. & del Río, M. D. L. C. (2018). Entrepreneurship and social innovation for sustainability. Bibliometric analysis. Strategies and Best Practices in Social Innovation içinde (11-29). Springer.
28. Ekinci, G. (2022). Dijital teknolojiler, yapay zekâ, girişimcilik ve inovasyon yayınları bibliyometrik analizi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (55), 163-188.
29. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university, Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121.
30. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix. University-Industry-Government in Action. New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
31. Fernandes, G., Marques, C., Silva, R. & Martins, H. (2022). Ethnic entrepreneurship: A bibliometric review and future research agenda. Strategic Change. 31 (5), 1-17.
32. Franzoni, C. ve Lissoni, F. (2006). Academic Entrepreneurship, Patents, and Spin-Offs: Critical Issues and Lessons for Europe. Kıtes Working Paper No. 180, Kıtes, Centre For Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Bocconi University, Milan.
33. Genç, G. (2022). Examination of postgraduate theses in Turkey within the scope of social enterprise/entrepreneur/entrepreneurship: a bibliometric analysis. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10 (2), 961-979.
34. Gössling, S., Moyle, B., & Weaver, D. (2021). Academic entrepreneurship: A bibliometric engagement model. Annals of Tourism Research. 90. 1-13.
35. Grimaldi., R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 40(8), 1045-1057.
36. Guindalini,, C., Verreynne,, M., & Kastelle, T. (2021). Taking scientific inventions to market: Mapping the academic entrepreneurship ecosystem, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(2), 121144.
37. Gulbrandsen, M. & Smeby, J. S. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance, Research Policy, 34 (6), 932-950.
38. Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. (2005). Tracing thought through time and space: A selective review of bibliometrics in social work. Social Work in Health Care, 41(3-4), 1–34.
39. Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M., (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? ınvestigating role ıdentity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy. 38 (6), 922-935.
40. Jarneving, B. (2007). Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. Journal of Informetrics, 1 (4), 287-307.
41. Kessler, M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation, 14 (1). 10-25.
42. Kılıç A., Oflaz, M., Acun, A., & Avcıkurt, C., (2017). Girişimcilik konulu lisansüstü tezlere yönelik bibliyometrik bir analiz. 8. International Congress on Entrepreneurship, Balıkesir.
43. Klofsten, M., Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe: the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14 (4), 299-315.
44. Lis, A., & Komarnicka, A. (2018). Academic entrepreneurship research profiling: towards tematic boundaries of the field. A. Nalepka & A. Ujwary-Gil (Eds.) Business and Non-profit Organizations Facing Increased Competition and Growing Customers’ Demands, 17, 23-35.
45. Llano, J.A. (2010). Determinants of academic entrepreneurship behavior: a multilevel model, Doktora Tezi., Stevens Institute of Technology, NJ, Erişim: http://search.proquest.com/docview/761483270/abstract/D1AD1021E98D45FDPQ/1
46. Lopes, J., Ferreira, J. J., Farinha, L. & Raposo, M. (2018). Emerging perspectives on regional academic entrepreneurship. Higher Education Policy. 33. 367–395.
47. Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 110-131.
48. Mars, M. M., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2010). Academic entrepreneurship (re) defined: significance and implications for the scholarship of higher education. Higher Education, 59(4), 441–460.
49. Miranda, F., Chamorro-Mera, A., Rubio, S. & Perez-Mayo, J. (2017). Academic entrepreneurial ıntention: the role of gender. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. 9 (1). 66-86.
50. Nederhof, A. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100.
51. O'Shea., R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F., (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities, Research Policy, 34(7), 994-1009.
52. Özer Çaylan, D. (2014). Stratejik girişimcilik alanına ilişkin bibliyometrik bir değerlendirme. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, 3(2), 61-80.
53. Özgü Çakır, B. (2020). A qualitative research on determining the dimensions of academic entrepreneurship ecosystem in Turkey, Turkish Studies - Economy, 15(1), 441-461.
54. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442.
55. Pilegaard,M, Moroz, P,W, & Neergaard, H., (2010). An auto-ethnographic perspective on academic entrepreneurship: ımplications for research in the social sciences and humanities, Academy of Management Perspectives, 46-61.
56. Potter, J. (Ed.). (2008). Entrepreneurship and higher education. Paris, France: OECD.
57. Powers, J. B. & Patricia P. M,. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291-311.
58. Radosevich, R. (1995). A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources. International Journal Technological Management, 10, 879-893.
59. Schmitz, A., D. Urbano, G. A. Dandolini, J. A. de Souza, & M. Guerrero., (2017). Innovation and entrepreneurship in the academic setting: a systematic literature review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13 (2): 369–95.
60. Schulte, P. (2004), The entrepreneurial university: a strategy for ınstitutional development, Higher Education In Europe, 29 (2), 187-191.
61. Secundo, G., Rippa, P., & Cerchione, R. (2020). Digital academic entrepreneurship: A structured literature review and avenue for a research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 157. 120118.
62. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
63. Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 327-350.
64. Sipahi, H. (2018). Girişimciliğin Geliştirilmesinde Mentorluğun Rolü: Teknoloji Geliştirme Bölgesi Örneği, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Giresun: Giresun Üniversitesi.
65. Skute, I. (2019). Opening the black box of academic entrepreneurship: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics. 120:237-265.
66. Wan, N. & Lv, X.. (2021). A bibliometric analysis on the landscape of entrepreneurship education in higher education (2001–2020). Entrepreneurship Education. 4, 375-402.
67. Yu, Y., Qin, Y., Xu, Z., & Skare, M. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of strategic entrepreneurship literature. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 18, 1475-1502.
68. Yumuşak, T. (2019). Kadın girişimciliğin bibliyometrik durum analizi. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 5 (3), 182-192.
69. Zou, X., Long, W., Le, H. (2018). Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of road safety studies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 118, 131–145.