Yeşil Yenilik ve Sürdürülebilirlik Performansı İlişkisinde Algılanan Yeşil Örgütsel Davranışın Aracı Rolü

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 265 - 282, 30.06.2025

Şerife Kuzgun

https://izlik.org/JA49WC46RF

Öz

Ulusal ve uluslararası düzeyde birçok politikaya yön veren sürdürülebilirlik, dinamik yapısı ve ilgili kavramlarla birlikte değerlendirildiğinde daha da önem kazanmaktadır. Yeşil kuruluşların sayısının ve çevre bilincinin hızla arttığı modern iş dünyasında, iş dünyasının ihtiyaç ve beklentilerini karşılamak için işletmelerin sürdürülebilirlik performansı, yeşil yenilik uygulamaları ve çalışanların yeşil davranışları daha fazla önem kazanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışma kapsamında yeşil yenilik ve sürdürülebilirlik performansı ilişkisini ve bu ilişkide algılanan yeşil örgütsel davranışın aracı rolünü keşfetmek amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışmada araştırma hipotezlerini test etmek amacıyla, Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren 317 işletme yöneticisinden anket yöntemiyle veri toplanmıştır. 317 yöneticiden elde edilen veri seti üzerinde, SPSS 26 ve AMOS 24 istatistik programları kullanılarak analiz çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Araştırma ile yeşil yeniliğin sürdürülebilirlik performansı ve algılanan yeşil örgütsel davranış üzerinde önemli bir etkisinin olduğu saptanmıştır. Ayrıca yeşil yenilik ve sürdürülebilirlik performansı arasındaki ilişkide algılanan yeşil örgütsel davranışın kısmi aracı rolü olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları tartışılmış ve önerilere yer verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yeşil Yenilik , Algılanan Yeşil Örgütsel Davranış , Sürdürülebilirlik Performansı

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmanın uygulanması için Kırklareli Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu tarafından, E-35882576-199-76250 sayılı yazı ve 17.02.2023 tarihli karar ile etik kurul onayı alınmıştır.

The Mediating Role of Perceived Green Organizational Behavior on the Relationship Between Green Innovation and Sustainability Performance

https://izlik.org/JA49WC46RF

Öz

Sustainability, which guides many policies at national and international levels, becomes even more important when evaluated with its dynamic structure and related concepts. In the modern business world, where the number of green organizations and environmental awareness are rapidly increasing, the sustainability performance of enterprises, green innovation practices and green behaviors of employees are gaining more importance in order to meet the needs and expectations of the business world. In this context, the aim of the study is to explore the relationship between green innovation and sustainability performance and the mediating role of perceived green organizational behavior in this relationship. In order to test the research hypotheses in the study, data were collected from 317 business managers operating in Turkey using the survey method. Analysis studies were conducted on the data set obtained from 317 managers using SPSS 26 and AMOS 24 statistical programs. The study determined that green innovation has a significant effect on sustainability performance and perceived green organizational behavior. In addition, it was found that perceived green organizational behavior has a partial mediating role in the relationship between green innovation and sustainability performance. The results of the study were discussed and suggestions were included.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Green Innovation , Perceived Green Organizational Behavior , Sustainability Performance

Kaynakça

• Afsar, B., & Umrani, W. A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 109-125.
• Ahmed, M. , Zehou, S., Raza, S. A., Qureshi, M. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2020). Impact of CSR and environmental triggers on employee green behavior: the mediating effect of employee well‐being. Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management. 27(5), 2225-2239.
• Akbari, M., Padash, H., Shahabaldini Parizi, Z., Rezaei, H., Shahriari, E., & Khosravani, A. (2022). A bibliometric review of green innovation research: identifying knowledge domain and network. Quality & Quantity, 1-31.
• Almeida, F., & Wasim, J. (2022). Eco-innovation and sustainable business performance: perspectives of SMEs in Portugal and the UK. Society and Business Review.
• Andersen, J. (2021). A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms. Technovation, 104, 102254.
• Arfi, W. B., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J. M. (2018). External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 129, 210-220.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28), 2.
• Banon G, A. J., Guillén P., M., Hoffman, W. M., & McNulty, R. E. (2011). Rethinking the concept of sustainability. Business and Society Review. 116(2), 171-191.
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
• Benn, S., Dunphy, D., & Griffiths, A. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability. Routledge.
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Boiral, O., & Paillé, P. (2012). Organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: Measurement and validation. Journal of Business Ethics. 109, 431-445.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Kahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 207-239.
• Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008) A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving towards new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 38(5), 360-387.
• Ch’ng, P. C., Cheah, J., & Amran, A. (2021). Eco-innovation practices and sustainable business performance: The moderating effect of market turbulence in the Malaysian technology industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 283, 124556, 1-11.
• Chen, Y. S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image – green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531-543.
• Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of business ethics. 116(1), 107-119.
• Chen, Y.S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics. 67(4), 331-339.
• Cheng, C. C., & Shiu, E. C. (2012). Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco-innovation: An implementation perspective. Technovation. 32(6), 329-344.
• Chou, C. J., Chen, C. W., & Conley, C. (2012). An approach to assessing sustainable product-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 1227-1241.
• Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. Johan Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Çankaya, S. Y. ve Sezen, B. (2015). Ekolojik yenilik ile sürdürülebilirlik performansı arasındaki ilişkide çevresel belirsizliğin moderatör etkisi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi. 11(24), 111-134.
• Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W., & Govindarajulu, N. (2009). A conceptual model for organizational citizenship behavior directed toward the environment. Business and Society. 48(2), 243-256.
• Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W., & Massoud, J. A. (2012). The role of training and empowerment in environmental performance: A study of the Mexican maquiladora industry. International Journal of operations & production management, 32(5), 631-647.
• Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 471-486.
• Değirmenci, B. (2021). Conceptual investigation of “green organizational behaviors” in the workplace. International Journal of Applied Business and Management Studies, 6(2), 2021.
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
• Dogaru, L. (2020). Eco-Innovation and the contribution of companies to the sustainable development. Procedia Manufacturing. (46), 294-298.
• Dumont, J., Shen, J., & Deng, X. (2017). Effects of green hrm practies on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management. 56(4), 613-627.
• Duong, C. D. (2022). Big five personality traits and green consumption: Bridging the attitude-intentionbehavior gap. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(6), 1123–1144.
• Dyllick T., & Hockerts, T. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business, Strategy and Environment. 11(1), 130-141.
• Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Environmental Quality Management. 8, 37-51.
• Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
• George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A. & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal. 59, 1880-1895.
• Hall, J., & Vredenburg, H. (2003). The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan management review.
• Han, H., Hsu, L. T. J., & Lee, J. S. (2009). Empirical investigation of the roles of attitudes toward green behaviors, overall image, gender, and age in hotel customers’ eco-friendly decision-making process. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 28, 519-528.
• Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
• Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of management, 37(5), 1464-1479.
• Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(2), 56-67.
• Huang, Y., Gan, J., Liu, B., & Zhao, K. (2024). Environmental policy and green development in urban and rural construction: beggar-thy-neighbor or win-win situation?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 446, 141201.
• Jia, J., Liu, H., Chin, T., & Hu, D. (2018). The continuous mediating effects of GHRM on employees’ green passion via transformational leadership and green creativity. Sustainability, 10(9), 3237.
• Jo, J. H., Roh, T. W., Kim, S., Youn, Y. C., Park, M. S., Han, K. J., & Jang, E. K. (2015). Eco-innovation for sustainability: Evidence from 49 countries in Asia and Europe. Sustainability. 7(12), 16820-16835.
• Khan, A. J., Hameed, W. U., Ahmed, T., Iqbal, J., Aplin, M. J., & Leahy, S. (2024). Green behaviors and innovations: A green hrm perspective to move from traditional to sustainable environmental performance. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 36(2), 231-248.
• Khan, N. U., Bhatti, M. N., Obaid, A., Sami, A., & Ullah, A. (2020), Do green human resource management practices contribute to sustainable performance in manufacturing industry?. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development. 19(4), 412-432.
• Khan, N. U., Irshad, A. R., Ahmed, A., & Khattak, A. (2021). Do organizational citizenship behavior for the environment predict triple bottom line performance in manufacturing firms?. Business Process Management Journal. 27(4).
• Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S. E., & Ployhart, R. E. (2017). Multilevel infuences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual diferences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1335-1358.
• Kim, K. H., Kim, M., & Qian, C. (2018). Effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A competitive-action perspective. Journal of management, 44(3), 1097-1118.
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equations modeling. New York: Guilford.
• Kpphgn, M., Arulrajah, A. A., & Senthilnathan, S. (2020). Mediating role of employee green behaviour towards sustainability performance of banks. Journal of Governance and Regulation. 9(2), 92-102.
• Kuzgun, Ş. (2022). Örgütsel dayanıklılık kapasitesi, yeşil yenilik, algılanan yeşil örgütsel davranış, çevresel belirsizlik ve sürdürülebilirlik performansı arasındaki ilişkiler, Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. İstanbul: Arel Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı.
• Kuzgun, Ş., & Gözükara, E. (2023). Örgütsel dayanıklılık kapasitesi, yeşil yenilik, algılanan yeşil örgütsel davranış ve sürdürülebilirlik performansı arasındaki ilişkiler: İSO 500 uygulaması. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(49), 399-432.
• Kuzgun, Ş. (2024). Yeşil girişimcilik literatürünün bibliyometrik analizi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(2), 692-712.
• Küçükoğlu, M. T. (2014). Sürdürülebilirlik ve yeşil yenilik perspektifinden Türk İşletmelerinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi SBE.
• Lee, K. H., & Ha-Brookshire, J. (2018). The effect of ethical climate and employees’ organizational citizenship behavior on US fashion retail organizations’ sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 361-377.
• Li, W., Bhutto, T. A., Xuhui, W., Maitlo, Q., Zafar, A. U., & Bhutto, N. A. (2020). Unlocking employees’ green creativity: The effects of green transformational leadership, green intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120229.
• Liu, Y., Zhu, J., Li, E. Y., Meng, Z., & Song, Y. (2020). Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency: The case of Yangtze river economic belt in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 155, 119993.
• Mahmood, F., & Nasir, N. (2023). Impact of green human resource management practises on sustainable performance: serial mediation of green intellectual capital and green behaviour. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(39).
• Malik, S. Y., Hayat Mughal, Y., Azam, T., Cao, Y., Wan, Z., Zhu, H., & Thurasamy, R. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, green human resources management, and sustainable performance: is organizational citizenship behavior towards environment the missing link?. Sustainability. 13(3), 1044.
• Meng, J., Murad, M., Li, C., Bakhtawar, A., & Ashraf, S. F. (2022). Green lifestyle: A tie between green human resource management practices and green organizational citizenship behavior. Sustainability, 15(1), 44.
• Meyers, M., & Rutjens, D. (2022). Applying a positive (organizational) psychology lens to the study of employee green behavior: a systematic review and research agenda. Frontiers in Psychology. 1-13.
• Mirahsani, N., Azizan, O., Shahriari, M., Rexhepi, G., & Najmi, A. (2024). Green culture toward employee green behavior; the mediation roles of perceived support and green identity. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(6), 16149-16172.
• Mo, X., Boadu, F., Liu, Y., Chen, Z., & Ofori, A. S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility activities and green innovation performance in organizations: do managerial environmental concerns and green absorptive capacity matter?. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 938682.
• Mukhtar, B., Shad, M. K., Woon, L. F., Haider, M., & Waqas, A. (2024). Integrating ESG disclosure into the relationship between CSR and green organizational culture toward green Innovation. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(2), 288-304.
• Naz, S., Jamshed, S., Nisar, Q. A., & Nasir, N. (2021). Green HRM, psychological green climate and proenvironmental behaviors: An efficacious drive towards environmental performance in China.Current Psychology, 1–16.
• Norton, T. A., Zacher, H., Parker, S. L., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2017). Bridging the gap between green behavioral intentions and employee green behavior: the role of green psychological climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 38, 996-1015.
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3r ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
• Ones, D.S. ve Dilchert, S. (2012a). “Employee green behaviors”. Jackson, S. E., Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S. ve Kraiger, K. (Eds.), Managing Human Resources for environmental sustainability içinde. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 85-116.
• Ones, D.S. & Dilchert, S. (2012b). Environmental sustainability at work: a call to action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 444-466.
• Ottman, J. (2017). The new rules of green marketing: Strategies, tools, and inspiration for sustainable branding. Routledge.
• Özgül, B. (2020). Yeşil inovasyon, öncülleri ve firma performansı arasındaki ilişki: rekabet stratejisinin moderatör rolü. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi SBE.
• Paillé, P., & Boiral, O. (2013). Pro-environmental behavior at work: Construct validity and determinants. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 36, 118-128.
• Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationship between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management, and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 47(1), 19-37.
• Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
• Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation. 26(1), 76-85.
• Ren, S., Tang, G., & Zhang, S. (2023). Small actions can make a big difference: Voluntary employee green behaviour at work and affective commitment to the organization. British Journal of Management, 34(1), 72-90.
• Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics. 32, 319-332.
• Renwick, D. W., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1-14.
• Resmî Gazete (2018). Küçük ve Orta Büyüklükteki işletmelerin Tanımı, Nitelikleri ve Sınıflandırılması Hakkında Yönetmelik (18.11.2005 tarih ve 25997 sayılı Resmi Gazete).
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior. pearson.
• Robertson, J. L. & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 34(2), 176-194.
• Sanni, M. (2018). Drivers of eco-innovation in the manufacturing sector of Nigeria. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 131, 303-314.
• Saunila, M., Ukko, J., & Rantala, T. (2018). Sustainability as a driver of green innovation investment and exploitation. Journal of cleaner production, 179, 631-641.
• Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual review of psychology, 64(1), 361-388.
• Shashwat, K. (2019). SMEs : Key Drivers of Green and Inclusive Growth. OECD Green Growth Papers. 3-56.
• Shrivastava, P. (2018). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. In Business Ethics and Strategy, Volumes I and II (pp. 317-334). Routledge.
• Song, M., Fisher, R., & Kwoh, Y. (2019). Technological challenges of green innovation and sustainable resource management with large scale data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 144, 36-368.
• Suki, N. M., Suki, N. M., Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Rexhepi, G. (2023). Importance of green innovation for business sustainability: Identifying the key role of green intellectual capital and green SCM. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1542-1558.
• Syafri, W., Prabowo, H., Nur, S. A., & Muafi, M. (2021). The impact of workplace green behavior and green innovation on green performance of SMEs: a case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 8(5), 365-374.
• Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). Boston, MA: pearson.
• Tang, G., Ren, S., Wang, M., Li, Y., & Zhang, S. (2023). Employee green behaviour: A review and recommendations for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(2), 297-317.
• TÜİK (2023): Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). Türkiye İmalat Sanayi İstatistikleri Raporu. Ankara: TÜİK Yayınları.
• Ueno, T. (2022). Capturing changes in residential occupant behavior due to work from home in Japan as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(4), 1280.
• Unsworth, K. L., Davis, M. C., Russell, S. V., & Bretter, C. (2021). Employee green behaviour: How organizations can help the environment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 1-6.
• Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286-300.
• Wang, J., Xue, Y., & Yang, J. (2022). Can proactive boundary‐spanning search enhance green innovation? The mediating role of organizational resilience. Business Strategy and the Environment. 1-15.
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2014). SPSS uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Yuan, Y., Ren, S., Tang, G., Ji, H., Cooke, F. L., & Wang, Z. (2024). How green human resource management affects employee voluntary workplace green behaviour: An integrated model. Human Resource Management Journal, 34(1), 91-121.
• Yurdakul, M. (2020). İşletmelerde sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanmasında eko inovasyon uygulamaları: Bir model önerisi. İşletme Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi (The Journal of Business, Economic and Management Research). 3(1), 15-33.
• Zhao, H., & Zhou, Q. (2019). Exploring the impact of responsible leadership on organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: A leadership identity perspective. Sustainability, 11(4), 944.
• Zibarras, L. D., & Coan, P. (2015). HRM practices used to promote pro-environmental behavior: a UK survey. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 26(16), 2121-2142.