Cinsiyet Uçurumunun Azaltılması: Asya'da İstihdam Eşitliğine Giden Sosyoekonomik Yollar

Öz

Erkekler ve kadınlar arasındaki önemli eşitsizliklerle birlikte, iş yerindeki cinsiyet eşitsizliği Asya'da önemli bir sorun olmaya devam etmektedir. Kadınlar için istihdamın nüfusa oranı 2024 yılında sadece %44,7 iken, bu oran erkekler için ortalama %73,5'tir. Kadınların istihdama katılımının %24,5, erkeklerin katılımının ise %75,3 olduğu Güney Asya, en eşitsiz bölgedir. Doğu ve Güneydoğu Asya'da kadın istihdam oranları sırasıyla %61,2 ve %55,8 ile daha yüksektir, ancak yine de %77'yi aşan erkek katılım oranının altındadır. Başlıca engeller arasında kültürel gelenekler, yetersiz çocuk bakım sistemi ve örgün eğitim ve istihdama sınırlı erişim yer almaktadır. Güney Asya'da bu eşitsizlikler yoksulluk ve eşitsizliği sürdürürken, Doğu ve Güneydoğu Asya'da maaş farklılıkları ve liderlik pozisyonlarında yetersiz temsil kapsayıcı ilerlemeyi engellemektedir. 2014 ve 2024 yılları arasında, sabit etkiler panel veri regresyon yaklaşımı ile, kentleşme, eğitim, ekonomik genişleme ve doğrudan yabancı yatırım (DYY) toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliğinin ilerletilmesinde önemli bir rol oynamıştır. Örneğin, Doğu Asya kentleşme ve eğitimdeki iyileşmeden faydalanmış olsa da, Güney Asya büyük yapısal ve kültürel engellerle karşılaşmaya devam etmektedir. Küçük iyileşmelere rağmen, kadınlar kayıt dışı ve güvencesiz işlerde aşırı temsil edilmeye devam etmekte, bu da ekonomik eşitsizliği artırmaktadır. Bu sorunların ele alınması için eğitimin yaygınlaştırılması, çocuk bakım sistemlerinin güçlendirilmesi, kadın girişimcilerin finansmana erişiminin artırılması ve eşit ücret yasalarının uygulanması gerekmektedir. Toplumsal cinsiyet uçurumunun kapatılması sadece ahlaki açıdan doğru değil, aynı zamanda kapsayıcı büyümeyi ve uzun vadeli bölgesel refahı desteklemek için ekonomik açıdan da önemlidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cinsiyet eşitsizliği
• İstihdamın nüfusa oranı
• Kültürel engeller

Bridging the Gender Gap: Socio-economic Pathways to Employment Equality in Asia

Öz

With significant inequalities between men and women, gender inequality in the workplace remains a significant issue in Asia. The employment-to-population ratio for women was only 44.7% in 2024, compared to an average of 73.5% for men. With women's participation at 24.5% and men's at 75.3%, South Asia is the most unequal area. In East and Southeast Asia, female employment rates are higher at 61.2% and 55.8%, respectively, but they are still below the male participation rate of more than 77%. Among the primary barriers are cultural customs, a subpar childcare system, and limited access to formal education and employment. In South Asia, these disparities perpetuate poverty and inequality, while in East and Southeast Asia, salary gaps and underrepresentation in leadership positions obstruct inclusive progress. Between 2014 and 2024, with fixed effects panel data regression approach, urbanization, education, economic expansion, and foreign direct investment (FDI) all had a significant role in advancing gender equality. For example, although East Asia has benefited from urbanization and improved education, South Asia continues to face major structural and cultural obstacles. Despite slight improvements, women continue to be overrepresented in informal and insecure jobs, which furthers economic inequality. Addressing these issues requires expanding education, strengthening childcare systems, enhancing access to financing for female entrepreneurs, and enforcing laws on equal pay. Closing the gender gap is not only morally right but also economically important to support inclusive growth and long-term regional prosperity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gender disparity
• Employment-to-population ratio
• Cultural barriers

Kaynakça

1. Ahmad, R., Sharif, F., Ahmad, S., Gul, A., & Abdirasulovna, Z. A. (2024). Does the digital economy improve female employment? A cross-country panel data analysis. Heliyon, 10(13), e33535.
2. Azmat, G., & Petrongolo, B. (2014). Gender and the labour market: What have we learned from field and lab experiments? Labour Economics, 30, 32–40.
3. Banerjee, M. (2019). Gender equality and labour force participation: Mind the gap. Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 4(1), 113–123.
4. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., Fink, G., & Finlay, J. E. (2009). Fertility, female labour force participation, and the demographic dividend. Journal of Economic Growth, 14(2), 79–101.
5. Borrowman, M., & Klasen, S. (2019). Drivers of gendered sectoral and occupational segregation in developing countries. Feminist Economics, 26(2), 62–94.
6. Boserup, E. (1970). Woman's role in economic development. St. Martin's Press.
7. Bredtmann, J., & Otten, S. (2023). Natives' gender norms and the labour market integration of female immigrants. Ruhr Economic Papers, 1042. RWI- Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
8. Bryan, E., Alvi, M., Huyer, S., & Ringler, C. (2023). Addressing gender inequalities and strengthening women’s agency for climate-resilient and sustainable food systems. CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform Working Paper, 013. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129709

9. Budina, N., Ebeke, C., Jaumotte, F., Medici, P., Panton, A. J., Tavares, M. M., & Yao, B. (2023). Structural reforms to accelerate growth, ease policy trade-offs, and support the green transition in emerging market and developing economies. IMF Staff Discussion Note, 2023/007.
10. Dahal, S., Gaspar, R., & Schellekens, P. (2024). Update of the 2024 Asia-Pacific Regional Human Development Report. United Nations Development Program: Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific.
11. De Henau, J., & Perrons, D. (2016). Investing in the care economy to boost employment and gender equality. Women’s Budget Group. https://wbg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/De_Henau_Perrons_WBG_CareEconomy_ITUC_briefing_final.pdf
12. Dias, F. (2021). Achieving sustainable development goals through women’s economic empowerment. In W. Leal Filho, A. Marisa Azul, L. Brandli, A. Lange Salvia, & T. Wall (Eds.), Gender equality. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (pp. xx–xx). Springer.
13. Eastin, J., & Prakash, A. (2013). Economic development and gender equality: Is there a gender Kuznets curve? World Politics, 65(1), 156–184.
14. Goldin, C. (1995). The U-shaped female labour force function in economic development and economic history. In T. P. Schultz (Ed.), Investment in women’s human capital and economic development (pp. 61–90). University of Chicago Press.
15. Gomes, S., Lopes, J. M., & Ferreira, L. (2022). The impact of the digital economy on economic growth: The case of OECD countries. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 23(6), 1–31.
16. Gu, J., Kolovich, L. L., Mondragon, J., Newiak, M., & Herrmann, M. (2024). Promoting gender equality and tackling demographic challenges. Gender Notes, 2024(002), A001. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400277788.067.A001
17. Halim, D., O’Sullivan, M. B., & Sahay, A. (2023). Increasing female labour force participation. World Bank Group Gender Thematic Policy Notes Series.
18. International Labour Organization. (2023). Where women work in Asia and the Pacific: Implications for policies, equity and inclusive growth. International Labour Organization and Asian Development Bank.
19. International Labour Organization. (2023). Women missing out on benefits of labour market growth in Asia and the Pacific. https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/women-missing-out-benefits-labour-market-growth-asia-and-pacific
20. International Labour Organization. (2024). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2024. Genova.
21. Jayachandran, S. (2021). Social norms as a barrier to women’s employment in developing countries. IMF Economic Review, 69(3), 576–595.
22. Kazandjian, R., Kolovich, L., Kochhar, K., & Newiak, M. (2019). Gender equality and economic diversification. Social Sciences, 8(4), 118.
23. Klasen, S. (2019). What explains uneven female labour force participation levels and trends in developing countries? The World Bank Research Observer, 34(2), 161–197.
24. Lo Bue, M. C., Ngoc Le, T. T., Santos Silva, M., & Sen, K. (2022). Gender and vulnerable employment in the developing world: Evidence from global microdata. World Development, 159, 106010.
25. Malta, V., & Newiak, M. (2019). Human capital and gender equality: Nigeria selected issues. IMF Country Report, 19/23. International Monetary Fund.
26. Nazneen, S., Hossain, N., & Chopra, D. (2019). Introduction: Contentious women's empowerment in South Asia. Contemporary South Asia, 27(4), 457–470.
27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). SIGI 2024 Regional Report for Southeast Asia: Time to care. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7fc15e1c-en
28. Oostendorp, H. R. (2009). Globalization and the gender wage gap. The World Bank Economic Review, 23(1), 141–161.
29. Perkins, M. A. (2024). Asian gender outlook: Achieving the SDGs for all and leaving no woman or girl behind. UN Women.
30. Petrongolo, B., & Ronchi, M. (2020). Gender gaps and the structure of local labour markets. Labour Economics, 64, 101819.
31. Puh, C., Yiadom, A. K., Johnson, J., Fernando, F., Yazid, H., & Thiemann, C. (2022). Tackling legal impediments to women’s economic empowerment. IMF Working Paper, 2022/037. International Monetary Fund.
32. Small, S. F., & van der Meulen Rodgers, Y. (2023). The gendered effects of investing in physical and social infrastructure. World Development, 171, 106347.
33. World Bank. (2024). Women, business and the law 2024. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.
34. Xu, R. (2023). Japan’s economy would gain with more women in science and technology. IMF News. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2023/11/13/cf-japans-economy-would-gain-with-more-women-in-science-and-technology