Türkiye’de Gelir Dağılımı ve Çevresel Bozulma Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Çevresel bozulma ve gelir eşitsizliği sorunsalı, küresel bir sorun olarak ülkelerin gündeminde yer almaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türkiye’de 1990-2020 dönemi için gelir dağılımının çevresel bozulma üzerindeki etkisinin belirlenmesidir. Çalışmada gelir dağılımının çevresel bozulma üzerindeki etkileri, ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı ve Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular, ekonomik büyümenin kısa dönemde çevre kirliliğini artırırken, gelir dağılımı ve sanayileşmenin çevre üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi olmadığını göstermektedir. Uzun dönemdeki bulgular ise ekonomik büyümenin çevre kirliliğini artırırken, gelir eşitsizliğindeki artışın emisyon seviyelerini azalttığını göstermektedir. Bunun yanında çevresel bozulma üzerinde sanayileşmenin anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı da tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgulardan hareketle sonuç bölümünde, Türkiye’de gelir dağılımı ile çevresel bozulma arasındaki ilişki belirlenerek gelir dağılımında eşitsizliği, çevre sorunlarında çevresel bozulmayı azaltıcı yönde öneriler sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gelir Dağılımı
• Çevresel Bozulma
• Ekonomik Büyüme
• Türkiye
• ARDL

The Relationship Between Income Distribution and Environmental Degradation in Türkiye

Öz

Environmental degradation and income inequality are global issues that are on the agenda of countries around the world. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of income distribution on environmental degradation in Turkey between 1990 and 2020. The effects of income distribution on environmental degradation were examined using the ARDL bounds test approach and the Toda-Yamamoto causality method. The findings of the study show that economic growth increases environmental pollution in the short term, while income distribution and industrialization do not have a statistically significant effect on the environment. The long-term findings show that economic growth increases environmental pollution, while an increase in income inequality reduces emission levels. Additionally, it was found that industrialization has no significant effect on environmental degradation. Based on the findings of the study, the conclusion section identifies the relationship between income distribution and environmental degradation in Turkey and presents recommendations to reduce income inequality and mitigate environmental degradation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Income Distribution
• Environmental Degradation
• Economic Growth
• Türkiye
• ARDL

Kaynakça

1. Aktan, C. C., & Vural, İ. Y. (2002). Gelir dağılımında adalet (siz)lik ve gelir eşit(siz)liği: Terminoloji, temel kavramlar ve ölçüm yöntemleri, yoksullukla mücadele stratejileri. Ankara: Hak-İş Konfederasyonu Yayınları.
2. Che, C., Li, S., Yin, Q., Li, Q., Geng, X., & Zheng, H. (2023). Does income inequality have a heterogeneous effect on carbon emissions between developed and developing countries? Evidence from simultaneous quantile regression. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11.
3. Demir, C., Cergibozan, R., & Gök, A. (2019). Income inequality and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Energy & Environment, 30(3), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X18793109
4. Destek, M. A. (2019). Türkiye’de gelir dağılımının çevre kirliliği üzerindeki etkileri üzerine bir inceleme. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(4), 1477–1488. https://doi.org/10.21547/JSS.556006
5. Destek, M. A., Okumuş, İ., & Manga, M. (2017). Türkiye’de finansal gelişim ve gelir dağılımı ilişkisi: Finansal Kuznets eğrisi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 18(2), 153–165.
6. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517
7. Erkişi, K. (2024). Income inequality and CO2 emissions nexus: A long-run analysis for Turkey. Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment, 1, 171–191. https://doi.org/10.3280/efe2024-001010
8. European Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network. (2023). Environmental degradation. https://civil-protection-knowledge-network.europa.eu/eu-overview-risks/risk-drivers/environmental-degradation

9. Ganda, F., & Ruza, C. (2025). Unveiling the non-linear dynamics: Quantile regression of financial development's impact on environmental degradation in BRICS and G7 nations. Discover Sustainability(60). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00792-y
10. Hahnel, R. (2016). Income distribution and environmental sustainability: A Sraffian approach (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315390246
11. Hassan, S. T., Batool, B., Zhu, B., & Khan, I. (2022). Environmental complexity of globalization, education, and income inequalities: New insights of energy poverty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 340, 130735.
12. Hewett, W. W. (1925). The definition of income. The American Economic Review, 15(2), 239–246.
13. İsagiller, A. (2013). Income distribution and economic growth. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(1), 83–94.
14. Karataş, M. (2019). Gelir dağılımının teorik yapısı. Hak-İş Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 8(21), 52–79. https://doi.org/10.31199/hakisderg.546147
15. Khan, H., Weili, L., Khan, I., & Han, L. (2021). The effect of income inequality and energy consumption on environmental degradation: The role of institutions and financial development in 180 countries of the world. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 20632–20649.
16. Koengkan, M., Fuinhas, J. A., Tavares, A. I., & Gonçalves Silva, N. M. (2023). Causes of environmental degradation in the Latin American and Caribbean region. In Obesity epidemic and the environment (pp. 173–217). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-99339-5.00002-9
17. Levy, F. (2018). Distribution of income. Econlib Encyclopedia. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/DistributionofIncome.html
18. Magnani, E. (2000). The environmental Kuznets curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 431–443.
19. Ozturk, S., Çetin, M., & Demir, H. (2021). Income inequality and CO2 emissions: Nonlinear evidence from Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-021-01922-Y
20. Pata, U. K., Yılancı, V., Hussain, B., & Asif Ali Naqvi, S. (2022). Analyzing the role of income inequality and political stability in environmental degradation: Evidence from South Asia. Gondwana Research, 107, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.02.009
21. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
22. Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
23. Rojas-Vallejos, J., & Lastuka, A. (2020). The income inequality and carbon emissions trade-off revisited. Energy Policy, 139, 111302.
24. Sachs, J. D. (2014). The year of sustainable development. Project Syndicate.
25. Seyidoğlu, H. (1992). Ekonomik terimler ansiklopedik sözlük. Ankara: Güzem Yayınları.
26. Shahbaz, M., Loganathan, N., Tiwari, A. K., & Sherafatian-Jahromi, R. (2014). Financial development and income inequality: Is there any financial Kuznets curve in Iran? Social Indicators Research, 124(2), 357–382.
27. Solt, F. (2020). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: The Standardized World Income Inequality Database. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1183–1199. SWIID Version 9.8, December 2024.
28. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225–250.
29. Ullah, A., & Ali, A. (2024). Investigating corruption, income inequality, and environmental degradation in Pakistan: A time series analysis. Journal of Energy and Environmental Policy Options, 7(1), 9–18.
30. Ulucak, R., Danish, Zhang, Y., Chen, R., & Qiu, Y. (2023). Income inequality, economic complexity, and renewable energy impacts in controlling consumption-based carbon emissions. Evaluation Review, 48(1), 119–142.
31. Uzar, U. (2024). The dynamic effect of income distribution, natural resources, and freedom of press on ecological footprint: Theory and empirical evidence for emerging economies. Resources Policy, 89, 104682.
32. Wan, G., Wang, C., Wang, J., & Zhang, X. (2022). The income inequality-CO2 emissions nexus: Transmission mechanisms. Ecological Economics, 195, 107360.
33. Wang, J. (2024). Renewable energy, inequality and environmental degradation. Journal of Environmental Management, 356, 120563.
34. Wang, Q., Yang, T., & Li, R. (2023). Does income inequality reshape the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis? A nonlinear panel data analysis. Environmental Research, 216, 114575.
35. World Bank. (2025). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/
36. Yang, B., Ali, M., Hashmi, S. H., & Shabir, M. (2020). Income inequality and CO2 emissions in developing countries: The moderating role of financial instability. Sustainability, 12(17), 6810.