Endonezya'da İç Politika Faktörlerinin ve Güçlerinin Dış Politikaya Etkisi

Öz

Bu araştırma, dış politika yapımında önemli etkiye sahip olan iç politik faktörleri ve güçleri incelemeyi ve Endonezya hükümetinin Rohingya davası ile ilgili olarak nasıl hedefler koyduğunu tespit etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Uluslararası ilişkiler alanındaki literatürde, akademisyenler tarafından bir ülkenin uluslararası politikasına atıfta bulunmak için kullanılan kavram dış ilişkiler siyaseti yerine dış ilişkiler politikasıdır. Rohingya ile ilgili konularda Endonezya, Güneydoğu Asya'yı (ASEAN) ilk stratejik ortam olarak görmektedir. ASEAN istikrarı için ele alınan konular, ASEAN istikrarsızlığının Endonezya'nın iç koşullarını da olumsuz yönde etkileyeceği göz önüne alınarak, Endonezya'nın dış politika öncelikleri arasında yer almaktadır. Endonezya, ASEAN üyeleri arasında eşitlerin birincisi sayılmaktadır ve bölgesel sorunların aşılmasında etkin rol alması beklenmektedir. Bu bağlamda uygulanmakta olan Endonezya dış politikası, iletişimsel ve yapıcı bir politikadır.   

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dış Politika,Rohingya Sorunları,İç Politik

The Effect of Domestic Political Factors and Forces to the Foreign Policy Making in Indonesia

Öz

This research aimed to examine the domestic political factors and forces that have a significant effect on the foreign policy making and determine how the Indonesian government implements and sets targets to be achieved in relation to the Rohingya case. In various literature on international relations, the concept used by IR scholars to refer to a country's policy towards the international world is foreign policy instead of foreign politics. Regarding Rohingya issues, Indonesia considers Southeast Asia (ASEAN) as the first strategic environment. Issues bringing implications for ASEAN stability have become one of the Indonesian foreign policy priorities, given that ASEAN instability will also negatively affect Indonesia's domestic conditions. Indonesia is regarded as primus interpares among ASEAN members and is highly expected to play an active role in overcoming regional issues. The Indonesian foreign policy implemented in this case is a communicative and constructive foreign policy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Foreign Policy,Rohingya Issues,Domestic Political

Kaynakça

1. Ahmad, A. A. (2016). The Principle of Non-Interference and the Question of Human Rights Violation: The Case of the Rohingya Minority. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 3(4), 287-292.
2. AlJazeera (2015). Indonesia to Turn Back Rohingya Boats. Article dated May 12, 2015. (Accessed on July 19, 2017), retrieved from: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/05/150512045951738.html
3. Al-Mahmood, S. (2016). Timeline: a short history of Myanmar’s Rohingya minority. The Wall Street Journal. Dec 23 2016, Accessed from https://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2016/12/23/timeline-a-short-history-of-myanmars-rohingya-minority/
4. ANTARA News (2016). Indonesia urges ASEAN to take role regarding Rohingya: DPR. Antara News, Article dated 24 November 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.antaranews.com/en/news/108020/indonesia-urges-asean-to-take-role-regarding-rohingya-dpr
5. Asplund, A. (2014). ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: civil society organizations’ limited influence on ASEAN. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 7(2), 191-199.
6. Azis, A. (2015). Rohingya crisis: Redux. The Jakarta Post, Article dated 20 May 2015. Retrieved from: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/05/20/rohingya-crisis-redux.html
7. Bendor, J., & Hammond, T. H. (1992). Rethinking Allison's models. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 301-322.
8. Bonasir, R. (2015). Mengapa orang-orang Rohingya melarikan diri dari Myanmar?. BBC Indonesia, Article dated May 22, 2015. Retrieved from: http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia/2015/05/150522_dunia_myanmar_exodus

9. Brown, C. (2005). Understanding International Relations. New York: Palgrave MacMilan.
10. Coyne, J. (2016). Jakarta: Rohingya’s last hope. The Jakarta Post, Article dated 23 November 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2016/11/23/jakarta-rohingyas-last-hope.html
11. Davies, M. (2017). Is ASEAN a newfound voice for the Rohingya?. East Asia Forum, 28 March 2017.
12. East Asia Forum (2017). Myanmar’s hard road to democracy. Article dated 29 May 2017. Retrieved from: http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/05/29/myanmars-hard-road-to-democracy/
13. Forsythe, D. P. (2006). Human Rights in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Hara, A. E. (2011). Pengantar Analisis Politik Luar Negeri: Dari Realisme sampai Konstruktivisme. Bandung: Penerbit Nuansa.
15. Hudson-Rodd, N. (2016). Rohingya Genocide: International Complicity in Burma Domestic Violence. Article dated 03 May 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australian_outlook/rohingya-genocide-international-complicity-in-burmas-brutal-domestic-violence/
16. Joanne L. (2016). ASEAN’s ability to promote human rights is anything but sure. Article dated 15 September 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.humanosphere.org/human-rights/2016/09/aseans-ability-promote-human-rights-anything-sure/
17. Kipgen, N. (2013). Conflict in Rakhine State in Myanmar: Rohingya Muslims' Conundrum. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 33(2), 298-310.
18. Medcalf, R. (2013). The Indo-Pacific: What’s in a name?. The American Interest, 9(2), 58-66.
19. Nilsen, M., & Tønnesson, S. (2016). Myanmar’s ethnic minorities marginalised more. East Asia Forum, Article dated 13 April 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/04/13/myanmars-ethnic-minorities-marginalised-more/
20. Nugroho, J. (2015). Rohingya Crisis a Test Case for Asean — And Indonesia. The Jakarta Globe, Article dated May 26, 2015. Retrieved from: https://jakartaglobe.id/context/johannes-nugroho-rohingya-crisis-test-case-asean-indonesia/
21. Panda, A. (2016). International Court issues unanimous awards in Philippines vs. China cases on South China Sea. The Diplomat, Article dated 12 July 2016. Retrieved from: https://thediplomat.com/2016/07/international-court-issues-unanimous-award-in-philippines-v-china-case-on-south-china-sea/
22. Sifton, J. (2016). Human Rights Shouldn’t be Sidelined at ASEAN Summit. Human Rights Watch, Article dated February 10, 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/02/10/human-rights-shouldnt-be-sidelined-asean-summit
23. Smith, M., & Allsebrook, A. (1994). Ethnic groups in Burma: development, democracy and human rights. ASI’s Human Rights Series. London: Anti-Slavery International.
24. Staus, A., & Corbin, J. (1997). Dasa-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif: Prosedurr, Tehnik, dan Teori Grounded, Penyadur Drs. H.M. Djunaidi Ghony, PT. Bina Ilmu
25. Strategic Comments (2013). Reform fails to help Myanmar’s Rohingya. Strategic Comment, 19(10), viii-ix. https://doi.org/10.1080/13567888.2013.889386
26. Thawnghmung, A. M. (2016). The politics of indigeneity in Myanmar: competing narratives in Rakhine state. Asian Ethnicity, 17(4), 527-547.
27. The Economist (2015). The Rohingyas-The most persecuted people on Earth?. Retrieved from: http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21654124-myanmars-muslim-minority-have-been-attacked-impunity-stripped-vote-and-driven
28. The Sentinel Project (2015). Persecution of the Rohingya community in Burma. Retrieved from: http://vast-journey-7849.herokuapp.com/burmavisualization#
29. Umar, A. R. M. (2014). Making ASEAN Works in Rakhine: A Southeast Asian Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2488464