Dindarlık Düzeyinin Sürdürülebilir Giyim Satın Alma Davranışına Etkisi: Moda Bağlılığı ve Çevre Yanlısı Tutumun Aracılık Rolü

Öz

Çalışma, sürdürülebilir giyim satın alma davranışının bir bireyin dindarlık özellikleri ile karakterize edilip edilmediğini keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada ayrıca moda bağlılığı ve çevre yanlısı tutumların bu ilişkiye nasıl aracılık ettiği belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini Türkiye’de yaşayan ve giyim üzerine alışveriş yapan tüketiciler oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın amacı kapsamında 394 katılımcıdan anket formu ile kolayda örneklem metodu kullanılarak veri toplanmıştır. Önerilen yapısal modeli test etmek için kısmi en küçük karelere dayalı yapısal eşitlik modeli Smart PLS 3.3.2 (PLS-SEM) kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre içsel ve dışsal dindarlık moda bağlılığını, çevre yanlısı tutumu ve sürdürülebilir giyim satın alma davranışını olumlu yönde etkilemektedir. Moda bağlılığının ve çevre yanlısı tutumun benzer şekilde sürdürülebilir giyim satın alma davranışını olumlu yönde etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca moda bağlılığının; dışsal dindarlık ile sürdürülebilir giyim satın alma davranışına ve çevre yanlısı tutumun; içsel/dışsal dindarlık ile sürdürülebilir giyim satın alma davranışı üzerinde aracılık rolü tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Moda Bağlılığı
• Çevre Yanlısı Tutum
• Dindarlık
• Sürdürülebilir Giyim Satın Alma Davranışı

The Effect of Religiosity Level on Sustainable Fashion Purchasing Behavior: The Mediating Role of Fashion Commitment and Environmental Attitude

Öz

The study aims to discover whether sustainable fashion purchasing behaviors characterized by the religiousness traits of an individual. The study also attempted to determine how fashion involvement and pro-environmental attitudes mediate this relationship. The research population consist of consumers who live in Turkey and shopping on clothing. Within the scope of the purpose of the study, data were collected from 394 participants by using the convenience sampling method with a questionnaire. To test the proposed structural model, the structural equation model Smart PLS 3.3.2 (PLS-SEM) based on partial least squares was used. According to the results, internal and external religiosity positively affects fashion involvement, pro-environmental attitude and sustainable fashion purchasing behavior. It has been determined that fashion involvement and pro-environmental attitude have similarly positive effects on sustainable fashion purchasing behavior. In addition, fashion involvement, external religiosity and sustainable fashion purchasing behavior and pro-environmental attitude; a mediating role on intrinsic / extrinsic religiosity and sustainable fashion purchasing behavior has been identified.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fashion Involvement
• Pro-Environmental Attitude
• Sustainable Fashion Purchasing Behavior
• Religiosity

Kaynakça

1. Abdullah, M. S., & Keshminder, J. S. (2020). Religion and pro-environmental behaviour: A comparative analysis towards environmental protection. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 19(2), 174-194.
2. Abutaleb, S., El-Bassiouny, N. M., & Hamed, S. (2020). A conceptualization of the role of religiosity in online collaborative consumption behavior. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(1), 180-198.
3. Aidt, S. T. (2005). The rise of environmentalism, pollution taxes and intra-industry trade. Economics of Governance, 6(1), 1-12.
4. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
5. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-221.
6. Alam, S. S., Mohd, R., & Hisham, B. (2011). Is religiosity an important determinant on Muslim consumer behaviour in Malaysia? Journal of Islamic Marketing, 2(1), 83-96.
7. Al-Damkhi, A. M. (2008). Environmental ethics in Islam: Principles, violations, and future perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 65, 11-31.
8. Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and his religion. New York, NY: MacMillan.

9. Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432-443.
10. Alsaad, A., Saif-Alyousfi, A. Y., & Elrehail, H. (2020). Religiosity, idealism, and ethical consumption: the mediating effect of perceived customer effectiveness and moral obligation. Journal of Social Marketing, 11(1), 25-43.
11. Auty, S., & Elliott, R. (1998). Fashion involvement, self‐monitoring and the meaning of brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(2), 109-123.
12. Aygül, H. H., & Gürbüz, G. (2019). Tüketim, Moda ve İslami Giyim Açısından Tesettürlü/Türbanlı Öğrenciler: Akdeniz Üniversitesi Örneği. Muhafazakâr Düşünce, 56, 161-209.
13. Balderjahn, I., Buerke, A., Kirchgeorg, M., Peyer, M., Seegebarth, B., & Wiedmann, K. P. (2013). Consciousness for sustainable consumption: scale development and new insights in the economic dimension of consumers’ sustainability. AMS Review, 3(4), 181-192.
14. Baydaş, A., Say, Ş., & Derindağ, M. R. (2020). Dini tutum açısından tesettür moda giyim tercihinde etkili olan faktörlerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir çalışma. Bilimname, 41(1), 181-213.
15. Begum, A., Jingwei, L., Haider, M., Ajmal, M. M., Khan, S., & Han, H. (2021). Impact of Environmental Moral Education on Pro-Environmental Behaviour: Do Psychological Empowerment and Islamic Religiosity Matter? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1604.
16. Bhuian, S. N., Sharma, S. K., Butt, I., & Ahmed, Z. U. (2018). Antecedents and pro-environmental consumer behavior (PECB): The moderating role of religiosity. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(3), 287-299.
17. Bhuian, S., & Sharma, S. K. (2017). Predicting consumer pro-environmental behavioral intention: The moderating role of religiosity. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(3), 352-368.
18. Bishop, M. L. (2011). Apparel Market Research, Germany, Turkey, Ukraine, United States Agency, Deloitte Consulting LLP. (Erişim Tarihi: 29.06.2021), https://mes.gov.ge/uploads/EPI%20Apparel%20Market%20Research___.pdf
19. Bloch, P. H., Commuri, S., & Arnold, T. J. (2009). Exploring the origins of enduring product involvement. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 12, 49-69.
20. Brandão, A., & da Costa, A. G. (2021). Extending the theory of planned behaviour to understand the effects of barriers towards sustainable fashion consumption. European Business Review, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
21. Bukhari, S. F. H., Woodside, F. M., Hassan, R., Shaikh, A. L., Hussain, S., & Mazhar, W. (2019). Is religiosity an important consideration in Muslim consumer behavior. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(4), 1288-1307.
22. Cervellon M., Hjerth H., & Ricard S. (2010). Green in fashion? An exploratory study of national differences in consumers concern for eco-fashion. Proceedings of 9th International Marketing Trends Conference, Venice, January 20-21.
23. Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (295-336). Mahwah, Nj: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
25. Conca, K. (2000). American environmentalism confronts the global economy. Dissent, 47, 72-78.
26. Connell, K. Y. H. (2011). Exploring consumers’ perceptions of ecoconscious apparel acquisition behaviors. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(1), 61-73.
27. Connell, K. Y. H., & Kozar, J. M. (2014). Environmentally sustainable clothing consumption: knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. In Roadmap to sustainable textiles and clothing (pp. 41-61). Singapore: Springer.
28. Cuc, S., & Vidovic, M. (2014). Environmental sustainability through clothing recycling. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 4(2), 108-115.
29. Dali, N. R. S. M., Yousafzai, S., & Hamid, H. A. (2019). Religiosity scale development. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(1), 227-248.
30. De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2009). Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of social psychology, 149(4), 425-449.
31. Deniz, E. (2019). Tesettürlü Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Tesettür Giyim Alışverişlerinde Karar Verme Tarzları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 382-407.
32. Diddi, S., Yan, R. N., Bloodhart, B., Bajtelsmit, V., & McShane, K. (2019). Exploring young adult consumers’ sustainable clothing consumption intention-behavior gap: A Behavioral Reasoning Theory perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 200-209.
33. do Amaral Junior, A., De Almeida, L., & Vieira, L. K. (2019). Sustainable consumption: The right to a healthy environment. Springer Nature.
34. Dünya Gazetesi (2021). Türkiye, 2021’de su kıtlığı yaşayabilir. (Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2021), https://www.dunya.com/kose-yazisi/turkiye-2021de-su-kitligi-yasayabilir/602645
35. Eberstadt, N., & Shah, A. (2011). Fertility Decline in the Muslim World: A Veritable Sea-Change, Still Curiously Unnoticed. The American Enterprise Institute Working Paper Series on Development Policy, 7, 1-29.
36. El-Menouar, Y. (2014). The five dimensions of Muslim religiosity. Results of an empirical study. Methods, Data, Analyses, 8(1), 53-78.
37. Engelland, B. T. (2014). Religion, humanism, marketing, and the consumption of socially responsible products, services, and ideas: Introduction to a special topic section. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 1-4.
38. Eren, T., & Atılgan, K.Ö. (2019). Tesettür Giyim Ürünlerinde Moda Liderliği, Fiyat ve Tüketicilerin Dini Bağlılığı (Dindarlık) Arasındaki İlişkinin Araştırılması. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 43-52.
39. Euronews (2021). Dünya nüfusunun dörtte birinin su sorunu var. (Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2021), https://tr.euronews.com/2019/08/07/dunya-nufusunun-dortte-birinin-su-sorunu-var-turkiye-listede-32-sirada
40. Fang, W. T., Chiang, Y. T., Ng, E., & Lo, J. C. (2019). Using the norm activation model to predict the pro-environmental behaviors of public servants at the central and local governments in Taiwan. Sustainability, 11(13), 3712-3732.
41. Fletcher, K. (2008). Sustainable fashion and textiles design journeys. London: Earthscan.
42. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
43. Fu, L., Zhang, Y., Xiong, X., & Bai, Y. (2018). Pro-Environmental Awareness and Behaviors on Campus: Evidence from Tianjin, China. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 427-445.
44. Gam, H. J. (2011). Are fashion-conscious consumers more likely to adopt eco-friendly clothing? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 15, 178-193.
45. Gam, H. J., & Banning, J. (2011). Addressing sustainable apparel design challenges with problem-based learning. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 29, 202-215.
46. Goworek, H. (2011). Social and environmental sustainability in the clothing industry: A case study of a fair trade retailer. Social Responsibility Journal, 7, 74-86.
47. Gudergan, S. P., Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2008). Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1238-1249.
48. Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis of Recent Studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(1), 43-55.
49. Hair, J. F., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442-458.
50. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
51. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
52. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I–method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63-76.
53. Haq, M., Khan, N. R., & Ghouri, A. M. (2014). Measuring the mediating impact of hedonic consumption on fashion involvement and impulse buying behavior. Indian Journal of Commerce & Management Studies, 5(3), 50-57.
54. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 20, 277-319.
55. Holdcroft, B. B. (2006). What is religiosity. Catholic Education: A Journal of inquiry and practice, 10(1), 89-103.
56. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
57. Hur, E. (2020). Rebirth fashion: Secondhand clothing consumption values and perceived risks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 1-16.
58. Hustvedt, G., & Dickson, M. A. (2009). Consumer likelihood of purchasing organic cotton apparel: Influence of attitudes and self-identity. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 13(1), 49-65.
59. Iqbal, S., & Khan, M. I. (2020). Spirituality as a Predictor of Psychological Well-Being: An Explanatory Mechanism of Religiosity and Sustainable Consumption. Religions, 11(12), 634.
60. İHKİB (2021). Araştırma Raporları. (Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2021), https://www.ihkib.org.tr/tr/bilgi-bankasi/raporlar/arastirma-raporlari/k-297 İNSAMER (2021). Moda, İsraf ve İnsani Krizler. (Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2021), https://insamer.com/tr/moda-israf-ve-insani-krizler_2370.html
61. Jana-Masri, A., & Priester, P. E. (2007). The development and validation of a Qur’an-based instrument to assess Islamic religiosity: The religiosity of Islam scale. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2(2), 177-188.
62. Johnson, B., & Činčera, J. (2015). Examining the relationship between environmental attitudes and behaviour in education programmes. Sociální studia/Social Studies, 12(3), 97-111.
63. Joy, A., Sherry, J. F., Jr., Venkatesh, A., Wang, J., & Chan, R. (2012). Fast fashion, sustainability, and the ethical appeal of luxury brands. Fashion Theory, 16, 273-295.
64. Jung, J., Kim, S. J., & Kim, K. H. (2020). Sustainable marketing activities of traditional fashion market and brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 120, 294-301.
65. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
66. Kant, R. (2012). Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard. Natural Science, 4, 22-26.
67. Kim, H. S., & Damhorst, M. L. (1998). Environmental concern and apparel consumption. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 16, 126-133.
68. Kim, Y. K., Forney, J., & Arnold, E. (1997). Environmental messages in fashion advertisements: Impact on consumer responses. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(3), 147-154.
69. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
70. Liapati, G., Assiouras, I., & Decaudin, J. M. (2015). The role of fashion involvement, brand love and hedonic consumption tendency in fashion impulse purchasing. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 6(4), 251-264.
71. Liu, Y., Sheng, H., Mundorf, N., Redding, C., & Ye, Y. (2017). Integrating norm activation model and theory of planned behavior to understand sustainable transport behavior: Evidence from China. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(12), 1593.
72. Lundblad, L., & Davies, I. A. (2016). The values and motivations behind sustainable fashion consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(2), 149-162.
73. McGregor, S. L. (2007). Consumerism, the common good, and the human condition. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 99(3), 15-21.
74. Minton, E. A., Johnson, K. A., & Liu, R. L. (2019). Religiosity and special food consumption: The explanatory effects of moral priorities. Journal of Business Research, 95, 442-454.
75. Minton, E. A., Kahle, L. R., & Kim, C. H. (2015). Religion and motives for sustainable behaviors: A cross-cultural comparison and contrast. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1937-1944.
76. Mogahed, D. (2009). The Gallup Coexist Index 2009: A Global Study of Interfaith Relations: With an in-depth analysis of Muslim integration in France Germany and the United Kingdom. Washington D.C. Retrieved December 20.
77. Mohammad, J., Quoquab, F., & Sadom, N. Z. M. (2020). Mindful consumption of second-hand clothing: the role of eWOM, attitude and consumer engagement. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
78. Moon, K. K. L., Lai, C. S. Y., Lam, E. Y. N., & Chang, J. M. (2015). Popularization of sustainable fashion: barriers and solutions. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 106(9), 939-952.
79. Moon, K. K. L., Youn, C., Chang, J. M., & Yeung, A. W. H. (2013). Product design scenarios for energy saving: A case study of fashion apparel. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(2), 392-401.
80. Mukendi, A., Davies, I., Glozer, S., & McDonagh, P. (2020). Sustainable fashion: current and future research directions. European Journal of Marketing, 54(11), 2873-2909.
81. Nitzl, C., & Hirsch, B. (2016). The drivers of a superior’s trust formation in his subordinate. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 12(4), 472-503.
82. O’Cass, A. (2000). An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(5), 545-576.
83. O'Cass, A. (2004). Fashion clothing consumption: antecedents and consequences of fashion clothing involvement. European Journal of Marketing, 38(7), 869-882.
84. Orellano, A., Valor, C., & Chuvieco, E. (2020). The influence of religion on sustainable consumption: a systematic review and future research agenda. Sustainability, 12(19), 7901.
85. Park, E. J., Kim, E. Y., & Forney, J. C. (2006). A structural model of fashion‐oriented impulse buying behavior. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 10, 433-446.
86. Pavalache-Ilie, M., & Unianu, E. M. (2012). Locus of control and the pro-environmental attitudes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 198-202.
87. Rahman, M., Albaity, M., & Maruf, B. (2017). The role of religiosity on the relationship between materialism and fashion clothing consumption among Malaysian Generation Y consumers. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 757-783.
88. Rahman, M., Albaity, M., Isa, C. R., & Azma, N. (2018). Towards a better understanding of fashion clothing purchase involvement. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 9(3), 544-559.
89. Razzaq, A., Ansari, N. Y., Razzaq, Z., & Awan, H. M. (2018). The impact of fashion involvement and pro-environmental attitude on sustainable clothing consumption: The moderating role of Islamic religiosity. Sage Open, 8(2), 1-17.
90. Razzaque, M. A., & Chaudhry, S. N. (2013). Religiosity and Muslim consumers' decision‐making process in a non‐Muslim society. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 4(2), 198-217.
91. Rehman, A., & Shahbaz Shabbir, M. (2010). The relationship between religiosity and new product adoption. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 1(1), 63-69.
92. Said, A. M., Paim, L. H., & Masud, J. (2003). Environmental concerns, knowledge and practices gap among Malaysian teachers. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4, 305-313.
93. Sawitri, D. R., Hadiyanto, H., & Hadi, S. P. (2015). Pro-environmental behavior from a socialcognitive theory perspective. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 23, 27-33.
94. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 221-279). New York, NY: Academic Press.
95. Shahrin, R., Quoquab, F., Mohammad, J., & Jamil, R. (2020). Factors affecting consumers' pro-environmental behaviour in nutricosmetics consumption: the role of perceived environmental responsibility as a mediator. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14(5), 671-689.
96. Shrivastava, A., Jain, G., Kamble, S. S., & Belhadi, A. (2021). Sustainability through online renting clothing: Circular fashion fueled by instagram micro-celebrities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 1-10.
97. Smith, R. A., White-McNeil, A., & Ali, F. (2020). Students’ perceptions and behavior toward on-campus foodservice operations. International Hospitality Review, 34(1), 13-28.
98. Sönmez Çakır, F. (2020). Kısmi En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (PLS-SEM) SmartPLS 3.2. Uygulamaları. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
99. Steg, L., & De Groot, J. (2010). Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 725-743.
100. Stolz, J. (2009). Explaining religiosity: towards a unified theoretical model 1. The British journal of sociology, 60(2), 345-376.
101. Sustainable Development (2021). Goal 11: Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. (Erişim Tarihi: 29.06.2021), https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities/
102. Szczepaniak, M. (2015). Fashion involvement and innovativeness, self-expression through fashion and impulsive buying as segmentation criteria: Identifying consumer profiles in the Turkish market. Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management Journal, 3(1), 1-14.
103. T24 (2021). Optimar’dan din-inanç anketi: Yüzde 89 Allah'ın varlığına ve birliğine inanıyor. (Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2021), https://t24.com.tr/haber/optimar-dan-din-inanc-anketi-yuzde-89-allah-in-varligina-ve-birligine-inaniyor,821459
104. Talaat, R. M. (2020). Fashion consciousness, materialism and fashion clothing purchase involvement of young fashion consumers in Egypt: the mediation role of materialism. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
105. Teng, C. C., & Lu, C. H. (2016). Organic food consumption in Taiwan: Motives, involvement, and purchase intention under the moderating role of uncertainty. Appetite, 105, 95-105.
106. Tigert, D. J., Ring, L. J., & King, C. W. (1976). Fashion involvement and buying behavior: A methodological study. ACR North American Advances, 3, 46-52.
107. Tiliouine, H., Cummins, R. A., & Davern, M. (2009). Islamic religiosity, subjective well-being, and health. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 12(1), 55-74.
108. Trimble, D. E. (1997). The religious orientation scale: Review and meta-analysis of social desirability effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 970-986.
109. Tuhin, M. K. W., Miraz, M. H., Habib, M. M., & Alam, M. M. (2020). Strengthening consumers’ halal buying behaviour: role of attitude, religiosity and personal norm. Journal of Islamic Marketing, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
110. Turaga, R. M. R., Howarth, R. B., & Borsuk, M. E. (2010). Pro‐environmental behavior: Rational choice meets moral motivation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185(1), 211-224.
111. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Ticaret Bakanlığı (2018). Türkiye İsraf Raporu. (Erişim Tarihi: 23.02.2021), www.ticaret.gov.tr
112. Türkiye Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı (2014). Türkiye’de Dini Hayat Araştırması (Erişim Tarihi: 28.06.2021), http://www.ceidizleme.org/ekutuphaneresim/dosya/914_1.pdf
113. Udo, G. G., & Bagchi, K. K. (2019). The Role of Personal Norm in Predicting Intention for Digital Piracy. Issues in Information Systems, 20(4), 181-187.
114. Wang, S., Wang, J., Li, J., & Zhou, K. (2020). How and when does religiosity contribute to tourists’ intention to behave pro-environmentally in hotels?. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(8), 1120-1137.
115. Wisker, Z. L., Muniapan, B., & Rosinaite, V. (2020). Religiosity and sustainable practices in small to medium-sized businesses: a mixed-method analysis. Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics (MJBE), 6(2), 147-168.
116. Wong, K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32.
117. Worthington Jr, E. L., Wade, N. G., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., McCullough, M. E., Berry, J. W., ... & O'Connor, L. (2003). The Religious Commitment Inventory-10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of counseling psychology, 50(1), 84.
118. Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
119. Yıldız, E. (2020). SmartPLS ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Reflektif ve Formatif Yapılar. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
120. Yousaf, S., & Malik, M. S. (2013). Evaluating the influences of religiosity and product involvement level on the consumers. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 4(2), 163-186.
121. Zemo, K. H., & Nigus, H. Y. (2021). Does religion promote pro-environmental behaviour? A cross-country investigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 90-113.
122. Zeng, S., Wu, L., & Liu, T. (2020). Religious Identity and Public Pro-Environmental Behavior in China: The Mediating Role of Environmental Risk Perception. Religions, 11(4), 165.
123. Zerbetto, S. R., Gonçalves, M. A. S., Santile, N., Galera, S. A. F., Acorinte, A. C., & Giovannetti, G. (2017). Religiosity and spirituality: Mechanisms of positive influence on the life and treatment of alcoholics. Esc Anna Nery, 21(1), 1-8.
124. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.