Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Bibliometric Analysis of Human Resources Analytics: Web of Science Review

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 124 - 131, 30.06.2024

Öz

In this research, the status and development of the Human Resources Analytics field is revealed through bibliometric analysis. For this purpose, 192 studies on the subject published between 1996-2023 in the Web of Science database were compiled and subjected to counting and content analysis. While the most influential countries in the field are China, India and the USA, Turkey has found itself among the top ten. The contributions of Istanbul Technical University in this regard are among the findings of the study. According to content analysis, while the concept of performance continues to maintain its importance for the field, concepts such as analytical hierarchy process and strategy are likely to come to the fore in the future.

Kaynakça

  • Bassi, L. J., Carpenter, R., & McMurrer, D. (2010). HR Analysis Handbook (pp. 11, 13–14) Amsterdam.
  • Bersin, J., Collins, L., Mallon, D., Moir, J., & Straub, R. (2016). People analytics gaining speed, Deloitte Insights.
  • Cappelli, P. (2017). There’s no such thing as big data in HR. Harvard Business Review, 2, 2-4.
  • Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2007). Competing on analytics: The new science of winning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Edwards, M. R. (2019). HR metrics and analytics. In M. Thite (Ed.), E-HRM: Digital approaches, Directions and Applications. Routledge.
  • Ellmer, M., & Reichel, A. (2021). Staying close to business: the role of epistemic alignment in rendering HR analytics outputs relevant to decision-makers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(12), 2622-2642.
  • Fitz-Enz, J., & John Mattox, II. (2014). Predictive analytics for human resources. John Wiley & Sons.
  • GERÇEK, M., & GERÇEK, R. G. (2022). İnsan kaynakları yönetimi çalışmalarının bibliyometrik analizi (2017-2021). Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(4), 816-832.
  • Huselid, M. A. (2018). The science and practice of workforce analytics: Introduction to the HRM special issue. Human Resource Management, 57(3), 679-684.
  • Isson, J. P., & Harriott, J. S. (2016). People analytics in the era of big data: Changing the way you attract, acquire, develop, and retain talent. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kryscynski, D., Reeves, C., Stice‐Lusvardi, R., Ulrich, M., & Russell, G. (2018). Analytical abilities and the performance of HR professionals. Human Resource Management, 57(3), 715-738.
  • KORKMAZ, M., & GÜLTEKİN, Z. (2023). “Yeşil İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi” Başlıklı Çalışmaların Web Of Science Veri Tabanına Dayalı Bibliyometrik Analizi. Uluslararası Beşeri Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi, 9(20), 461-481.
  • Lepenioti, K., Bousdekis, A., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2020). Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 57-70.
  • Marler, J. H., & Boudreau, J. W. (2017). An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 3-26.
  • Marler, J. H., & Fisher, S. L. (2013). An evidence-based review of e-HRM and strategic human resource management. Human resource management review, 23(1), 18-36.
  • Van den Heuvel, S., & Bondarouk, T. (2017). The rise (and fall?) of HR analytics: A study into the future application, value, structure, and system support. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 4(2), 157-178.

İnsan Kaynakları Analitiğinin Bibliyometrik Analizi: Web Of Science İncelemesi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 124 - 131, 30.06.2024

Öz

Bu araştırmada İnsan Kaynakları Analitiği alanının durumu ve gelişimi bibliyometrik inceleme aracılığıyla ortaya konulmuştur. Bu amaca yönelik olarak Web of Science veri tabanında yer alan konuyla ilgili 1996-2023 yılları arasında yayımlanan 192 çalışma derlenerek sayım ve içerik analizlerine tabi tutulmuştur. Alanda en etkili ülkeler Çin, Hindistan ve ABD olurken Türkiye kendisine ilk on arasında yer bulmuştur. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesinin bu konuda yaptığı katkılar çalışmanın bulguları arasındadır. İçerik analizlerine göre performans kavramı alan için önemini korumaya devam ederken analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ve strateji gibi kavramların ilerleyen dönemlerde daha fazla ön plana çıkması muhtemeldir.

Kaynakça

  • Bassi, L. J., Carpenter, R., & McMurrer, D. (2010). HR Analysis Handbook (pp. 11, 13–14) Amsterdam.
  • Bersin, J., Collins, L., Mallon, D., Moir, J., & Straub, R. (2016). People analytics gaining speed, Deloitte Insights.
  • Cappelli, P. (2017). There’s no such thing as big data in HR. Harvard Business Review, 2, 2-4.
  • Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2007). Competing on analytics: The new science of winning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Edwards, M. R. (2019). HR metrics and analytics. In M. Thite (Ed.), E-HRM: Digital approaches, Directions and Applications. Routledge.
  • Ellmer, M., & Reichel, A. (2021). Staying close to business: the role of epistemic alignment in rendering HR analytics outputs relevant to decision-makers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(12), 2622-2642.
  • Fitz-Enz, J., & John Mattox, II. (2014). Predictive analytics for human resources. John Wiley & Sons.
  • GERÇEK, M., & GERÇEK, R. G. (2022). İnsan kaynakları yönetimi çalışmalarının bibliyometrik analizi (2017-2021). Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(4), 816-832.
  • Huselid, M. A. (2018). The science and practice of workforce analytics: Introduction to the HRM special issue. Human Resource Management, 57(3), 679-684.
  • Isson, J. P., & Harriott, J. S. (2016). People analytics in the era of big data: Changing the way you attract, acquire, develop, and retain talent. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kryscynski, D., Reeves, C., Stice‐Lusvardi, R., Ulrich, M., & Russell, G. (2018). Analytical abilities and the performance of HR professionals. Human Resource Management, 57(3), 715-738.
  • KORKMAZ, M., & GÜLTEKİN, Z. (2023). “Yeşil İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi” Başlıklı Çalışmaların Web Of Science Veri Tabanına Dayalı Bibliyometrik Analizi. Uluslararası Beşeri Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi, 9(20), 461-481.
  • Lepenioti, K., Bousdekis, A., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2020). Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 57-70.
  • Marler, J. H., & Boudreau, J. W. (2017). An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 3-26.
  • Marler, J. H., & Fisher, S. L. (2013). An evidence-based review of e-HRM and strategic human resource management. Human resource management review, 23(1), 18-36.
  • Van den Heuvel, S., & Bondarouk, T. (2017). The rise (and fall?) of HR analytics: A study into the future application, value, structure, and system support. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 4(2), 157-178.
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Mehmet Seyhan 0000-0002-7943-4543

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 23 Haziran 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Şubat 2024
Kabul Tarihi 6 Mayıs 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Seyhan, M. (2024). İnsan Kaynakları Analitiğinin Bibliyometrik Analizi: Web Of Science İncelemesi. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 9(1), 124-131.

The sole purpose of JOEEP is to be a prestigious journal which contributes to scientific knowledge. In order to keep this purpose, JOEEP, adopts and follows the publication policies of world’s prestigious scientific journals. All original and qualified works which may contribute to the scientific knowledge, are evaluated through a rigorous editorial and peer review process. Hereby, JOEEP is a peer reviewed and scientific journal. It strictly depends on the scientific principles, rules and ethical framework that are required to this qualification.

JOEEP is published as two issues per year June and December and all publication policies and processes are conducted according to the international standards. JOEEP accepts and publishes the research articles in the fields of economics, political economy, fiscal economics, applied economics, business economics, labour economics and econometrics. JOEEP, without depending on any institution or organization, is a non-profit journal that has an International Editorial Board specialist on their fields. All “Publication Process” and “Writing Guidelines” are explained in the related title and it is expected from authors to Show a complete match to the rules. JOEEP is an open Access journal.