Belirsizliğe Tahammülsüzlük Envanterinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

In this study, it has been aimed to enhance an attitude scale. that would evaluate the level of intolerance to uncertainty of adults. There are 20 items in the draft form of the scale. Three items were repealed from the scale with exploratory factor analysis and expert opinion. A four-factor measurement tool was obtained that explained 72,66% of the variance of 17 items. These four dimensions, called "Controlling", "Doubt", "Anxiety" and "Fear", were obtained as a result of the literature review and result of the explanatory factor analysis on intolerance to uncertainty. This scale with four sub-dimensions was prepared in accordance with the Likert measurement tool. Comfimatory factor analiysis resultsindicated that the scale is acceptable and has good fit values. T test values of the factors were calculated and ranged from 11,67 to 17,24. Item-total analysis and correlation analysis between factors were carried out and the results of these analyzes were found to be meaningful. As a result of the reliability calculations, the Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be ,93. The findings received showed that the Intolerance of Uncertainty Inventory consisting of 17 items is a valid and reliable measuring instrument.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Intolerance of uncertainty
• Inventory
• Reliability
• Validity

Uncertainty Intolerance Inventory Development: Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

In this study, it has been aimed to enhance an attitude scale. that would evaluate the level of intolerance to uncertainty of adults. There are 20 items in the draft form of the scale. Three items were repealed from the scale with exploratory factor analysis and expert opinion. A four-factor measurement tool was obtained that explained 72,66% of the variance of 17 items. These four dimensions, called "Controlling", "Doubt", "Anxiety" and "Fear", were obtained as a result of the literature review and result of the explanatory factor analysis on intolerance to uncertainty. This scale with four sub-dimensions was prepared in accordance with the Likert measurement tool. Comfimatory factor analiysis resultsindicated that the scale is acceptable and has good fit values. T test values of the factors were calculated and ranged from 11,67 to 17,24. Item-total analysis and correlation analysis between factors were carried out and the results of these analyzes were found to be meaningful. As a result of the reliability calculations, the Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be ,93. The findings received showed that the Intolerance of Uncertainty Inventory consisting of 17 items is a valid and reliable measuring instrument.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Intolerance of uncertainty
• Inventory
• Reliability
• Validity

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, E.C., Carleton, R.N., Diefenbach, M., & Han, P.K.J. (2019). The relationship between uncertainty and affect. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2504.
2. Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155-173.
3. Bredemeier, K., & Berenbaum, H. (2008). Intolerance of uncertainty and perceived threat. Behavior Research and Therapy, 46(1), 28-38.
4. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21(2), 230-258.
5. Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29-50.
6. Buhr, K., & Dugas, M.J. (2006). Investigating the construct validity of intolerance of uncertainty and its unique relationship with worry. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20(2), 222-236.
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
8. Carleton, R.N., Norton, M.A.P.J., & Asmundson, G.J.G. (2007). Fearing the unknown: A short version of the intolerance of uncertainty scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21(1), 105-117.

9. Cole, D.A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 584-594.
10. Costello, A.B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10, 1-9.
11. Davey, G.C.L. (1994). Worrying, social problem-solving abilities, and social problem-solving confidence. Behavior Research and Therapy, 32(3), 327-330.
12. Dugas, M.J., Freeston, M.H., & Ladouceur, R. (1997). Intolerance of uncertainty and problem orientation in worry. Cognitive Thearpy and Research, 21, 693-606.
13. Dugas, M.J., Gosselin, P., & Ladouceur, R. (2001). Intolerance of uncertainty and worry: Investigating narrow specificity in a nonclinical sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25(5), 551-558.
14. Dugas, M.J., Schwartz, A., & Francis, K. (2004). Intolerance of uncertainty, worry and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28(6), 835-842.
15. Ersanlı, K., & Uysal, E. (2015). Belirsizliğe karşı tutum ölçeğinin geliştirlmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(54), 46-53.
16. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd edition). London: SAGE Ltd.
17. Freeston, M.H., Rhéaume, J., Letarte, H., Dugas, M.J., & Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and Individual Differences, 17(6), 791-802.
18. Frenkel-brunswik, E. (1949). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 18(1), 108-143.
19. Grenier, S., Barrette, A.M., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). Intolerance of uncertainty and intolerance of ambiguity: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 593-600.
20. Grupe, D.W., & Nitschke, J.B. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: An integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 14(7), 488-501.
21. Han, P.K.J., Gutheil, C., Hutchinson, R.N., & LaChance, J.A. (2020). Cause or effect? The role of prognostic uncertainty in the fear of cancer recurrence. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 626038.
22. Hirsh, J.B., Mar, R.A., & Peterson, J.B. (2012). Psychological entropy: A framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychological Review, 119(2), 304-320.
23. Jöroskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Mooresville, IL: Scientific Software International.
24. Kalaycı, Ş. (2018). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
25. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principals and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
26. Leech, N.L., Barrett, K.C., & Morgan, G.A. (2005). SPSS for ıntermediate statistics use and ınterpretation (2nd edition). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
27. Meydan, C.H., & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
28. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (3rd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
29. Rosen, N.O., & Knäuper, B. (2009). A little uncertainty goes a long way: State and trait differences in uncertainty ınteract to increase information seeking but also ıncrease worry. Health Communication, 24(3), 228-238.
30. Sarı, S., & Dağ, İ. (2009). Belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük ölçeği, endişe ile ilgili olumlu inançlar ölçeği ve endişenin sonuçları ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması, geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 10, 261-270.
31. Sarıçam, H., Erguvan, F.M., Akın, A., & Akça, M.Ş. (2014). Belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük ölçeği (BTÖ-12) Türkçe formu: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik çalışması. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 1(3), 148-257.
32. Suhr, D. (2006). Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis? Proceedings of the 31st annual SAS? Users Group International Conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., Paper Number: 200-31.
33. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson.
34. Tavşancıl, E. (2010). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (4. Basım). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
35. Tory Higgins, E.T. (2000). Social cognition: Learning about what matters in the social world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(1), 3-39.
36. Türk Dil Kurumu-Belirsizlik (2024). https://sozluk.gov.tr/.