Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ile İşe Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişki: Spor Parkı Çalışanları Örneği

Öz

Örgütlerin hedef ve amaçlarına ulaşabilmesi için çalışan en önemli etkenler arasında yer almaktadır. Çalışanların işe bağlılıkları ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları hem çalışan hem örgüt açısından önemli bir konumdadır. Bu doğrultuda araştırma, Spor Parkı çalışanlarının işe bağlılıkları ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma nicel araştırma yöntemleri arasında yer alan korelasyonel araştırma deseni benimsenerek tasarlanmıştır. Araştırma grubunun belirlenmesinde G-power 3.18 istatistik programından faydalanılmıştır. Araştırmaya 134’ü erkek (%65.7), 70’i kadın (%35.7) olmak üzere toplam 204 çalışan katılım sağlamıştır. Araştırma kapsamında Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Ölçeği ile Utrecht İşe Bağlılık Ölçeği veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılardan elde edilen veriler IBM SPSS paket programından faydalanılarak analiz edilmiştir. İşe bağlılık ölçeği ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ölçeği alt boyutlarından biçimsel rol davranışı, örgütsel ses ve yardımseverlik arasında pozitif yönlü anlamlı ilişkilerin olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Diğer yandan bağımlı değişkendeki %35.6’lık varyansın bağımsız değişkenler tarafından açıklandığı tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda çalışanların örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arttıkça işe bağlılıklarının da artabileceği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İşe Bağlılık
• Davranış
• Örgütsel Vatandaşlık

The Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Work Engagement: The Example of Sports Park Employees

Öz

Employees are among the most important factors for organisations to achieve their goals and objectives. Employees' commitment to work and organisational citizenship behaviours are important for both employees and organisations. Accordingly, the research aims to examine the relationship between organisational citizenship behaviours and the work engagement of Sports Park employees. The research was designed by adopting the correlational research design, which is among the quantitative research methods. The G-power 3.18 statistical program was used to determine the research group. A total of 204 employees, 134 males (65.7%) and 70 females (35.7%), participated in the research. Organisational Citizenship Behaviour Scale and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale were used as data collection tools. The data obtained from the participants were analysed using the IBM SPSS package programme. It was found that there were positive, significant relationships between the work engagement scale and the sub-dimensions of the organisational citizenship behaviour scale, namely formal role behaviour, organisational voice, and helping. On the other hand, it was determined that 35.6% of the variance in the dependent variable was explained by the independent variables. As a result of the research, it was concluded that as the organisational citizenship behaviours of the employees increase, their commitment to work may also increase.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Work Engagement
• Behavior
• Organizational Citizenship

Kaynakça

1. Ahmad, M.S., Malik, M. I., Sajjad, M., Hyder, S., Hussain, S. & Ahmed, J. (2014). Linking teacher empowerment with organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Life Science Journal, 11(4), 105-108.
2. Alper Ay, F. (2018). Örgütsel davranışta ve insan kaynakları yönetimi uygulamalarında örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı. Beta Yayıncılık.
3. Aslan, Ş. (2008). The investigation of relation between organizational citizenship behavior with organizational commitment and professional commitment. Journal of Management and Economics, 15(2), 163-178.
4. Barkat, W., Waris, I., Ahmed, R. & Dad, M. (2024). Transformational leadership and frontline managers work engagement, innovative work behavior, organizational citizenship behavior, and employee sustainability in the hotel industry in Pakistan. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 23(2), 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2024.2282217
5. Buluç, B. (2008). The relationship between organizational health and organizational citizenship behaviors in secondary schools. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(4), 571-602.
6. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S.,& Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel psychology, 64(1), 89-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
7. Cohen, A. (2006). The relationship between multiple commitments and organizational citizenship behavior in Arab and Jewish culture. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 105-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.12.004
8. Demirel, Y. & Özçınar, M. F. (2009). The effect of organizational citizenship behavior on job satisfaction: a research on different sectors. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 130-144.

9. Dennıs, W.O. & Katherıne, R. (2006). A meta-analttic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48 (4), 775 – 802.
10. Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902
11. Ebeh, R. E., Njoku, E. C., Ikpeazu, O. C. & Benson, L. (2017). Organizational commitment and job involvement among casual workers: The role of organizational justice. Global Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(4), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.37745/gjhrm.2013
12. Eryılmaz, A. ve Doğan, T. (2012). Subjective Well-Being at Work: Investigating of Psychometric Properties of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 15(1), 49-55.
13. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (7th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Freudenberger, H. (1974). Staff Burnout. Journal of Social Issues, 30 (1), 159-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x
15. Griffin, M. L., Hogan, N. L., Lambert, E. G., Tucker-Gail, K. A. & Baker, D. N. (2010). Job involvement, job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment and the burnout of correctional staff. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809351682
16. Gül, N. & Öngel, G. (2023). The effect of work engagement and organizational identification on organizational citizenship behavior. Anadolu University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 24(1), 451-470. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1218757
17. Güldü, Ö. (2019). The effect of perceived social support on job ınvolvement levels of hospitality industry employees: Mediation role of aggreeableness personality trait. Journal of Tourism Studies, 1(1), 17-28. Hodson, R. (2002). Management citizenship behavior and its consequences. Work and Occupations, 29(1), 64-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888402029001004
18. Honnamane, P. S., Sreekanth, K. & Girish, G. P. (2024). Moderating role of gender on work engagement, task performance and organizational citizenship behavior in Indian IT Sector. International Journal of Religion, 5(6), 753-758. https://doi.org/10.61707/hnw26s68
19. Hoy, W. K. & Tarter, C. J. (2004). Organizational justice in schools: No justice without trust. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540410538831
20. Karaman, A. & Aylan, S. (2012). Organizational citizenship. Journal of Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 2(1), 35-48.
21. Kataria, A., Garg, P. & Rastogi, R. (2013). Does psychological climate augment OCBs? The mediating role of work engagement. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 16(4), 217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000007
22. Lambert, E. G., Liu, J., Jiang, S., Zhang, J. & Kelley, T. M. (2018). The antecedents of job involvement: an exploratory study among Chinese prison staff. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 54, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.06.002
23. Manafe, D. (2025). Workload and organizational culture as predictors of job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: Work engagement as a mediating role. Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis, 15(1), 102-125. https://doi.org/10.12928/fokus.v15i1.12721
24. Lyu, Y., Zhu, H., Zhong, H. J. & Hu, L. (2016). Abusive supervision and customer-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: The roles of hostile attribution bias and work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53, 69-80.
25. Ng, L. P., Choong, Y. O., Kuar, L. S., Tan, C. E. & Teoh, S. Y. (2019). Job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviour amongst health professionals: The mediating role of work engagement. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 14(3), 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2019.1698850
26. Onan, B. D. & Kılınç, E. (2023). The effect of organizational citizenship behavior and workaholism on job satisfaction ın manufacturıng businesses. International Journal of Arts and Social Studies, 6(11), 224-248.
27. Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
28. Özdem, G. (2012). The relationship between the organizational citizenship behaviours and the organizational and Professional commitments of secondary school teachers. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 6(2),12, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.20460/JGSM.2012615773
29. Park, J. & Kim, J. (2024). The relationship between perceived organizational support, work engagement, organizational citizenship behavior, and customer orientation in the public sports organizations context. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 153.https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030153
30. Sancar, O. & Bekaroğlu, Ş. B. (2020). An Adaptation of Organizational Citizenship Behavior Scale to Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 5(2), 99-107.
31. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
32. Schaufeli, W. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job Demands, Job Resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.248
33. Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V. & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Stadies, 3, 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
34. Sharma, B.R., Srivastova, V.N., Ningthoujam, S. & Arora, V. (2012). Job involvement as a key componant of work motivation: Search for predictors. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(2), 325-340.
35. Singh, A. & Gupta, B. (2015). Job involvement, organizational commitment, professional commitment, and team commitment: A study of generational diversity. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(6), 1192-1211.
36. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education, Allyn ve Bacon, Inc.
37. Ting, Q. H., Lew, T. Y., Goi, C. L., Sim, A. K. & Gim, G. C. (2024). Psychological capital and employee engagement as predictors of organisational citizenship behaviour in the industrial revolution 4.0 era: transfer of training as a mediator. Current Psychology, 43(6), 5219-5242.
38. Tutar, H. (2000). Küreselleşme sürecinde işletme yönetimi. Hayat Yayınları.
39. Urbini, F., Chirumbolo, A. & Callea, A. (2020). Promoting ındividual and organizational OCBs: The mediating role of work engagement. Behavioral Sciences, 10(9), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10090138
40. Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W. & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765–802. https://doi.org/10.2307/256600
41. Vey, M. A. & Campbell, J. P. (2004). In-role or extra-role organizational citizenship behavior: which are we measuring? Human Performance, 17(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1701_6