Problems Encountered in Distance Initial Literacy Teaching During the Pandemic Period (Covid-19)

Öz

This study aims to examine the problems encountered in the period of distance initial literacy teaching during the pandemic based on the first-grade primary school teachers' opinions. In this qualitative study, data were collected through the interview technique. The study group of the study was determined by the criterion sampling method. The study group consist of 11 classroom teachers who taught initial literacy teaching during pandemic period. The data were analyzed by content analysis using Maxqda software. The results of this study show that problems encountered in the distance initial literacy teaching during the pandemic period were grouped under three themes: "Technology", "Interaction," and "Initial Literacy Teaching Process". According to the opinions of classroom teachers, there were problems with internet access during this period. There are insufficient educational technology devices such as computers, tablet computers, etc. The competency of students and parents to use technology is quite insufficient. Students behaved arbitrarily on attendance to classes, and problems occurred in parental support, teacher-student communication, and teacher-parent communication. During the initial literacy teaching process, problems such as holding the pen incorrectly, not being able to organize the notebook, writing the letter incorrectly, not being able to understand and inability to combine sounds, and not being able to dictate were seen. Problems such as measurement and assessment problems, unable to feedback to students, and difficulty in following student progress were determined.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Covid 19 pandemic
• distance education
• initial literacy teaching
• classroom teacher

Kaynakça

1. Aktaş, N., & Çoban Sural, Ü. (2023). Effects of the emergency distance education process on first literacy teaching: experiences of first grade teachers and parents. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(1), 142-209. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.1160758.
2. Berg, G.A., & Simonson, M. (2023). Distance learning, Encyclopædia Britannica, www.britannica.com/topic/distance-learning.
3. De Paepe, L., Zhu, C., & Depryck, K. (2018). Online Dutch L2 learning in adult education: Educators’ and providers’ viewpoints on needs, advantages and disadvantages. Open Learning, 33(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2017.1414586.
4. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–32). Sage Publications Ltd. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-07735-001.
5. DiCicco-Bloom, B. & Crabtree, B.F. (2006), The qualitative research interview. Medical Education.(40),314-321, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x.
6. Downe‐Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health care for women international, 13(3), 313-321.
7. Erbaş, Y. H. (2021). Covid-19 salgını döneminde eğitim: İlkokuma yazma öğretiminde karşılaşılan sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(2), 360-380, https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.851724.
8. Gürbüz, E. & Yılmaz, M. (2021). Pandemi döneminde ilk okuma yazma öğretimi sürecinde karşilaşilan sorunlara ilişkin sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşleri, Journal Of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 7(40):1088-1094.http://dx.doi.org/10.31589/JOSHAS.647.

9. Hanushek, E., &Woessmann, L. (2020). The economic impacts of learning losses. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/The-economic-impacts-of-coronavirus-covid-19-learning-losses.pdf.
10. Holzweiss, P.C. , Joyner, S.A., Fuller, M.B., Henderson, S., & Young, R. (2014) Online graduate students’ perceptions of best learning experiences, Distance Education, 35 (3), 311-323, https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955262.
11. Jacob, S., & Radhai, S. (2016). Trends in ICT E-learning: Challenges and Expectations. International journal of innovative research and development, 5, 196-201.https://www.internationaljournalcorner.com/index.php/ijird_ojs/article/view/136123/95244.
12. Jaggars, SS. (2014) Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education 28, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.867697.
13. Lee-Post, A. & Hapke, H (2017). Online learning integrity approaches: Current practices and future solutions, Online Learning 21(1),135-145. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.843.
14. Lei, S. A., & Gupta, R. K. (2010). College distance education courses: Evaluating benefits and costs from institutional, faculty and students’ perspectives. Education, 130(4), 616–631. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-227597132/college-distance-education-courses-evaluating-benefits.
15. MoNE (2020, 13 March) Personel genel müdürlüğü idari izin konulu yazı. http://maol.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_03/16140039_idari_izin.pdf
16. Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013) Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001.
17. Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Developing learners. Upper Saddle River, Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
18. Özcan, A. F., & Saydam, E. N. (2021). Perceptions of primary school first grade teachers towards initial reading writing teaching in the covid 19 epidemic process. Journal of Interdisciplinary Education: Theory and Practice, 3(2), 62-86, https://doi.org/10.47157/jietp.949255.
19. Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
20. Reimers, F. (2021). Education and Covid-19: Recovering from the shock created by the pandemic and building back better. UNESCO. Paris. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378626.
21. Ryan, T. G., Toye, M., Charron, K., & Park, G. (2012). Learning management system migration: An analysis of stakeholder perspectives. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1126.
22. Şahin, Ç. & Kalaycıoğlu Akis, Ç. (2021). Covid-19 salgını sürecinde ilk okuma ve yazma öğretiminde eğitsel oyun uygulamalarına yönelik öğretmen görüşleri. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 10(3), 631-647, https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.1114841.
23. Venter, K. (2003). Coping with isolation: The role of culture in adult distance learners’ use of surrogates. Open Learning, 18(3), 271–287. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0268051032000131035.
24. WHO (2020, 11 March). WHO director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on covid-19 -11 March 2020. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020.
25. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
26. Zuhairi, A., Wahyono, E., & Suratinah, S. (2006). The historical context, current development, and future challenges of distance education in Indonesia. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(1), 95–101. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-1040201321/the-historical-context-current-development-and-future.