The 'Arm's Length Principle' and Its Role In The 21st Century Arts and Cultural Sector

Öz

This paper discusses the theory and practice of the ‘arm’s length principle’ in the UK arts and cultural sector. The discussion begins with a brief overview of Arm’s Lenght Bodies, historical events and moments that have supported and at times challenged the principle, focusssing on the ideological repercussions of the post-Second World War with reference to John Maynard Keynes’ views which largely shaped its formation and practice in the second half of the 20th century. The second part of the discussion looks at more recent distribution methods adopted by the Arts Council England observing a move away from the theoretical aspects of the principle itself towards more instrumental concerns. The discussion then moves on to consider this as the effects of the New Management, and the formation of the new funding strategies. Lastly, the paper concludes by looks at the relationship between what is known as the New Management and the theoretical idea of the ‘Arm’s Length principle’ considering its shifting role in public funding of the arts and culture. In conclusion, the question of considering whether ALP is the best approach to delivering public funding for the arts is raised by drawing a comparative account between international examples.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Arm’s length principle
• arm’s length bodies
• arts council
• new management

'Emsallere Uygunluk İlkesi' ve 21. Yüzyılda Sanat ve Kültür Sektöründeki Rolü

Öz

Bu makale, Birleşik Krallık’da sanat ve kültür sektöründe “emsallere uygunluk ilkesi”nin teori ve uygulamasını tartışmaktadır. Tartışma, John Maynard Keynes'in bu ilkenin oluşumunu ve pratiğini büyük ölçüde şekillendiren görüşlerine atıfta bulunarak ve İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrasının ideolojik yansımalarına odaklanarak, ilkeyi destekleyen ve bazen de ona meydan okuyan tarihsel olaylara ve anlara kısa bir genel bakışla başlar. Tartışmanın ikinci kısmı, İngiltere Sanat Konseyi tarafından benimsenen daha yakın tarihli dağıtım yöntemlerine bakarak, ilkenin teorik yönlerinden daha araçsal kaygılara doğru bir yönelim gösterdiğini gözlemler. Tartışma daha sonra bunu Yeni Yönetimin etkileri ışığında yeni finansman stratejilerininsi oluşumu olarak ele almaktadır. Makale, Yeni Yönetim olarak bilinen yaklaşım ile sanat ve kültürün kamu tarafından finanse edilmesindeki değişen rolünü göz önünde bulundurarak “emsallere uygunluk ilkesi”'nin kamuya hizmet etmede en iyi yaklaşım olup olmadığını sorgular. Son olarak, “emsallere uygunluk ilkesi”nde teori ve uygulama arasındaki ilişkiyi uluslararası örneklerle karşılaştırmalı bir değerlendirme ile sonuçlanır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Emsallere uygunluk ilkesi
• emsallere uygun kurum
• sanat konseyi
• yeni yönetim

Kaynakça

1. Annan, N. (1955). “The Intellectual Aristocracy” in Studies in Social History, ed. Plumb, J.H., London: Longmans, Green. Pp. 241-287.
2. Appleyard, B. “A cut-out-and-keep guide to saving the arts” (2010, 29, August). Sunday Times. http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/culture/music/classical/article379456.ece. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
3. Arts Council England 2014 (1940-2000). https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/timeline/1940s. Date of Access: 17th June 2021
4. Arts Council England. (2010, 25, November). “National Portfolio Programme: guidance for applicants.”
5. Aspden, P. “Struggling arts bodies to get Lottery rescue”, Financial Times, 25/26 April 2009. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/87b6d702-3127-11de-8196-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2q1LwiCZe . Date of Access: 10th January 2014
6. Backhouse, R.E and Bateman, B.W., eds. (2006). The Cambridge Companion to Keynes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bakshi, H., Freeman, A. And Hitchen, G. (2009). “Measuring the intrinsic value – how to stop worrying and love economics”. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14902/1/MPRA paper 14902.pdf. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
8. Belfiore, E. & Bennett O. (2009). “Researching the Social Impact of the Arts: literature, fiction and the novel” in International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15:1. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/41278/. Date of Access: 10th January 2014

9. Belfiore, E. (2002). “Art as a means towards alleviating social exclusion: does it really work? A critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK” in International journal of cultural policy, 8:1, pp. 91-106.
10. Bennett, O. and Belfiore, E. (2008). The Social Impact of the Arts: An Intellectual History, Palgrave/Macmillan: Basingstoke.
11. Biswas, S. “How the arts are funded outside the UK” (2010, 20, October). BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-11569883. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
12. Brown, M. and Kennedy, M. “UK Film Council axed” (2010, 26, July). Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/jul/26/uk-film-council-axed. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
13. CMS Committee report. (2011, 28, March). “Funding of the arts and heritage”, London.
14. Davies, GT. (2008). At arm's length: recollections and reflections on the arts, media and a young democracy, Bridgend: Sere.
15. Davies, R., and Lindley, R. (2003). Artists in figures – a statistical portrait of cultural occupation. Research report. London: The Arts Council of England.
16. DCMS (June 2010)The Apportionment of Money in the National Lottery Distribution Fund Order 2010: impact assessment.
17. Donnelly, K.J. (2013, 22, March). “Management of Major Capital Projects”, DCAL.
18. Donovan, C. (2013, 10, May). A Holistic approach to valuing our culture: a report to the Department for Culture, Media ad Sport: UK [Online]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/197826/Holistic_Approach_10_May_2013finalforweb.pdf. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
19. Frey, B.S. (2000). Arts & Economics. Analysis & Cultural Policy. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag.
20. Glinkowski, P. (2011). “Artists and policy-making: the English case” in International Journal of Cultural Policy, 1-7, pp. 1-17.
21. Goodwin, C. (2006). “The art of an ethical life: Keynes and Bloomsbury” in Backhouse, R.E and Bateman, B.W., eds. (2006) The Cambridge Companion to Keynes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp. 217-236.
22. Gray, C. (2000). The politics of the arts in Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
23. Groĭs, B. (2006). Ilya Kabakov: the man who flew into space from his apartment, Afterall: University of Michigan.
24. Hamilton, C., and A. Scullion. (2002). The Effectiveness of the Scottish Arts Council’s Links & Partnerships with other Agencies. The University of Glasgow.
25. Herztein, R. (1978). The War That Hitler Won: The Most Infamous Propaganda Campaign in History, New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
26. Hewison, R. (2003). Valuing Culture, London: Demos. http://demos.co.uk/files/File/VACURHewison.pdf. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
27. Higgins, C. “Arts Council England will save £6.5m as staff cut by a quarter” (2009, 26, February). Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2009/feb/26/arts-council-staff-cuts. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
28. HM Treasury (2010). “Reforming Arm’s Length Bodies”, London.
29. Holden, J. (2004). Capturing Cultural Value: How culture has become a tool of government policy, London: Demos.
30. Holden, J. (2006). Cultural Value and the crisis of legitimacy, London: Demos.
31. Hoyle, B. “Cut! Film Council’s death is mourned by British directors” (2010, 27, July). Times. http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article2659973.ece. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
32. Hunt, J. “I’ve cut the UK Film Council so that money goes to the industry” (2010, 8, August). Observer. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/aug/08/film-council-quangos-cuts-jeremy-hunt. Date of Access: 5th January 2014
33. Hutchinson, R. (1982). The politics of the arts council, London: Sinclair Browne.
34. Hutter, M. and Throsby, D. (2008). “Beyond Price. Value in Culture, Economics and the Arts” in Journal of Cultural Economics, 32:4, pp. 321-324.
35. In Landmark buildings soared over budget by £25m. (2013, 22, March). News Letter. http://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/regional/landmark-buildings-soared-over-budget-by-25m-1-4926521. Date of Access: 5th January 2014
36. Jowell, T. (2004). Government and the Value of Culture. http://www.shiftyparadigms.org/images/Cultural_Policy/Tessa_Jowell.pdf. Date of Access: 30th October 2013
37. Kabakov, I. Et al. (2005). An alternative history of art: Rosenthal, Kabakov, Spivak, Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland: University of Michigan.
38. Katherine Tonkiss and Katherine Dommett, “The bonfires of quangos have thus far only smouldered” (2013, 17, January). British Politics and Policy at LSE. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/archives/29739. Date of Access: 2nd January 2014
39. Keaney, E. (2006). From Access to Participation: Cultural Policy and Civil Renewal, London: IPPR.
40. Keynes, J.M. (1982). Collected writings of John Maynard Keynes. Vol. XXVIII. D. Moggridge, ed., New York: Macmillan/Cambridge University Press.
41. Lewis, D. (2005). Essential Guide to British Quangos, Centre for Policy Studies.
42. Logan, B. “Arts funding row breaks out in Wales”(2006, 7 February). Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/feb/07/wales.artsfunding. Date of Access: 3rd January 2014
43. Lowell, J.F. and Ondaatje, E.H. (2006). Arts and State Governments: At Arm's Length or Arm in Arm?, Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
44. Madden, C. (2009). “The Independence of Government Arts Funding: A Review” in D’Art Topics in Arts Policy, No. 9, Sydney: International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies. http://media.ifacca.org/files/Dart9independencereport(1).pdf. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
45. Mangset, P. (2008). The arm’s length principle and the art funding system: A comparative approach, conference presentation, iccpr2008, Istanbul: Yeditepe University.
46. Matarasso, F. and Landry, C. (1999). Balancing act: twenty-one strategic dilemmas in cultural policy, Cultural Policies Research and Development Unit, No. 4, Belgium: Council of Europe Publishing.
47. McCarthy, K.F., et al. (2005). Gifts of the Muse, California: RAND.
48. McGuigan, J. (2004). Rethinking Cultural Policy, McGraw-Hill International.
49. McMaster, B. (2008). Supporting Excellence in the Arts: From Measurement to Judgement, London: DCMS. http://www.creativetrust.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Supporting-Excellence-in-the-Arts1.pdf. Date of Access: 30th October 2013
50. Moore, H.M. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Harvard Press.
51. Northern Ireland Audit Office (2007, 4, May). “Good Governance – Effective Relationships between Departments and their Arm’s Length Bodies,” HC 469, Session 2006-2007, London.
52. O’Brien, D. (2010). Measuring the Value of Culture: A Report to the Department of Culture, Media and Sport. London: DCAL.
53. O’Brien, D. (2013). Cultural Policy: Management, Value and Modernity in the Creative Industries, London: Routledge.
54. O’Hagan, J. (1998). The State and the Arts: An Analysis of Key Economic Policy Issues in Europe and the United States, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
55. OECD. (2006). Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Conducting Business in Weak Governance Zones, OECD, Paris. http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=7245. Date of Access: 24th December 2013
56. Pankratz, D. (2011). “Evaluation in the Arts” in The Arts Management Handbook, eds. Brindle, M and Devereaux, C., New York: M.E Sharpe.
57. Peacock, A. (1993). Keynes and the role of the state, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
58. Pearson, A. “Arts Council England admits funding imbalance” (2013, 1, November). The Journal. http://www.thejournal.co.uk/news/arts-council-england-admits-funding-6261997. Date of Access: 3rd January 2014
59. Peden, G.C. Keynes, (1988). the Treasury and British Economic Policy, Palgrave Macmillan.
60. Peden, G.C. ed. (2004). Keynes and his Critics, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
61. Peev, G. “Just one in ten quengos has been abolished despite the Coalition’s promise to weild the axe” (2013, 10 June). Dailymail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2359772/Just-quangos-abolished-despite-Coalitions-promise-wield-axe.html. Date of Access: 21st December 2013
62. Petropoulis, J. (2000). The Faustian Bargain: The Art World in Nazi Germany, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Pinnock, A. (2006). “Public Value or Intrinsic Value? The Arts-Economic Consequences of Mr Keynes” in Public Money and Management, 26:3, pp. 173-180.
64. Q&A: What is a quango?. (2010, 14, October). BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11405840. Date of Access: 28th December 2013
65. Quinn, R.B. (1997). “Distance or Intimancy? – The Arm’s Length Principle, the British Government and the Arts Council of Great Britain” in International Journal of Cultural Policy, 4:1, pp. 127-160.
66. Quinn, R.B. (1998). Public Policy and the Arts: A Comparative Study of Great Britain and Ireland. Aldershot: Ashgate.
67. Reeves, M. (2002). Measuring the economic and social impact of the arts: a review. http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/uploads/documents/publications/340.pdf Date of Access: 30th October 2013 Reid, I. (1984). “Glory of the Garden: An Appraisal” in The Political Quarterly 55:3, London: Blackwell, pp. 320-324.
68. Rueschmeyer, M. (1993). “State Patronage in the German Democratic Republic: Artistic and Political Change in a State Socialist Society” in Paying the Piper: Causes and Consequences of Art Patronage, ed. Balfe, J. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
69. Sheffield, G. (2001). “Let’s Abolish the Arts Council”, Evening Standard. http://business.highbeam.com/5729/article-1G1-75326380/let-abolish-arts-council. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
70. Shields, R. “North is the poor relation in spending on the arts” (2009, 28, March). Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/north-is-the-poor-relation-in-spending-on-the-arts-1656030.html. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
71. Stark, P., Christopher, G., Gordon, P. (2013). Rebalancing our Cultural Capital. http://www.theroccreport.co.uk/. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
72. The Arts Council of England news release (2010, 4, November). The biggest change to arts funding in a generation.
73. The Arts Council of England press notice. (2011, 31, March). Arts Council England announces funding decision and new national portfolio of arts organisations.
74. The Arts Council of England. (2003). Artists in figures: A statistical portrait of cultural occupation. Research Report 31. London: The Arts Council of England.
75. The Arts Council of Great Britain. (1985). An invitation to the nation to invest in the arts, A Great Britain success story. London: The Arts Council of Great Britain.
76. Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and Culture, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
77. Upchurch, A. "The Intellectual Origins of the Arts Council Movement: the Cases of Great Britain, Canada and the United States" PhD Thesis, Warwick University.
78. Upchurch, A. (2004). "John Maynard Keynes, the Bloomsbury Group, and the Arts Council Movement" in International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10:2, pp. 203–217.
79. Upchurch, A. (2010). “Keynes’ legacy: an intellectual’s influence reflected in arts policy” in International Journal of Cultural Policy, 17:1, 69-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10286630903456851. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
80. Ward, P. and Dolphin, G. (2011, 6, May). “Funding the Arts”, Home Affairs, HC SN/HA/5706. www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN05706.pdf. Date of Access: 26th December 2013
81. West, C. and Smith, C. (2006). “’We are Not a Government Poodle’: Museums and Social Inclusion under New Labour” in International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11:3, pp. 275-288.
82. Wilding, R. (1989). “Supporting the arts: a review of the structure of arts funding”. London: Office of Arts and Libraries.
83. Williams, R. (1983). Culture and society 1789-1950, New York: Columbia University Press.
84. Wilson, H. (1965). white paper, Policy for the Arts: The first steps, London: HMSO.
85. Wintour, P. and Brown, M. “Culture department braces itself for redundancies of up to 50%”, Guardian, 21 July 2010. http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/jul/20/culture-department-staff-redundancies-cuts. Date of Access: 10th January 2014
86. Wyszomirski, M. (1995). “Federal Cultural support: Toward a New Paradigm” in Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society, Spring, 25:1, pp. 69-83.