Sağlık Eğitimi Veren Kurumlarda Biyogüvenliğin Önemi: Gelişmiş Bir Derleme Çalışması

Öz

Sağlık eğitimi sunan kurumlar, uygulamalı öğretim süreçleri ve klinik rotasyonlar nedeniyle biyolojik risklerin yoğun olarak bulunduğu ortamlardır. Bu derleme çalışmada; tıp, diş hekimliği, hemşirelik ve ebelik gibi disiplinlerde öğrenim gören öğrenciler ile görev yapan personelin maruz kaldığı biyolojik tehlikeler ve bu risklerin yönetiminde kurumsal stratejilerin belirleyici rolü literatür verileri doğrultusunda sistematik biçimde değerlendirilmiştir. Mevcut bulgular, sağlık öğrencilerinin teorik bilgi düzeylerinin görece yüksek olmasına karşın, klinik uygulama sürecinde kişisel koruyucu ekipman kullanımına uyum ve mesleki maruziyet sonrası kaza bildirimi konularında yetersizlikler bulunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Özellikle aerosol maruziyeti, kesici-delici alet yaralanmaları ve kan ve vücut sıvılarıyla temas gibi branşa özgü risklerin yönetiminde yalnızca bireysel önlemlerin yeterli olmadığı; sürdürülebilir bir biyogüvenlik yaklaşımı için kurum düzeyinde yapılandırılmış, “suçlayıcı olmayan” bir güvenlik kültürünün tesis edilmesi gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır. Eğitim personelinin biyogüvenlik farkındalığını değerlendiren ölçek temelli çalışmalar, teknik ve akademik kadronun bilgi, tutum ve uygulama düzeylerinin kurumsal güvenliğin sürekliliğinde kritik öneme sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, biyogüvenlik eğitimlerinin simülasyon temelli öğretim, sanal gerçeklik uygulamaları ve senaryo tabanlı öğrenme yöntemleriyle desteklenmesi; hem kurum içi risk yönetim kapasitesini güçlendirecek hem de uzun vadede küresel halk sağlığının korunmasına katkı sağlayacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biyogüvenlik
• Sağlık Eğitimi
• Laboratuvar Güvenliği
• Risk Yönetimi
• Biyoemniyet

The Importance of Biosafety in Health Education Institutions: An Advanced Review Study

Öz

Institutions providing health education are environments characterized by a high density of biological risks due to the nature of practical training processes and clinical rotations. In this review study, the biological hazards encountered by students and staff in disciplines such as medicine, dentistry, nursing, and midwifery, as well as the decisive role of institutional strategies in managing these risks, were systematically evaluated in light of the existing literature. Current evidence indicates that although health students generally possess relatively high levels of theoretical knowledge, they demonstrate deficiencies in adherence to personal protective equipment (PPE) use and in reporting occupational exposures during clinical practice. In particular, the management of discipline-specific risks—such as aerosol exposure, sharps injuries, and contact with blood and body fluids—cannot rely solely on individual precautions; rather, it necessitates the establishment of a structured, non-punitive safety culture at the institutional level to ensure a sustainable biosafety framework. Scale-based studies assessing biosafety awareness among educational personnel further demonstrate that the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of technical and academic staff play a critical role in maintaining institutional safety. In conclusion, integrating biosafety education with simulation-based training, virtual reality applications, and scenario-based learning approaches will not only strengthen institutional risk management capacity but also contribute to the long-term protection of global public health.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biosafety
• Health Education
• Laboratory Safety
• Risk Management
• Biosecurity

Kaynakça

1. [1] Ahmed, H. K., Eisa, I. M., Abdallah, E. I., Hamouda, D. G., Omer, A. E., & Eltayeb, L. B. (2022). Appraisal of biosafety measures in governmental medical laboratory personnel: Knowledge, attitude, practice (KAP) study. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 13(3-2022), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.51847/EOHG7NGYvX
2. [2] Al-Abadla, A., Abu-Hani, R., & Al-Rousan, M. (2020). Biosafety knowledge and compliance in dental schools: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Dental Education, 84(11), 1250–1258. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12315
3. [3] Bahat, H., Hasidov-Gafni, A., Youngster, I., Goldman, M., & Levtzion-Korach, O. (2021). The prevalence and underreporting of needlestick injuries among hospital workers: a cross-sectional study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 33(1), mzab009. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzab009
4. [4] Bhattarai, S., KC, S., Pradhan, P. M., Lama, S., & Rijal, S. (2014). Hepatitis B vaccination status and needle-stick and sharps-related injuries among medical school students in Nepal: A cross-sectional study. BMC Research Notes, 7(1), 774. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-774
5. [5] Dickmann, P., Sheeley, H., & Lightfoot, N. (2015). Biosafety and biosecurity: A relative risk-based framework for safer, more secure, and sustainable laboratory capacity building. Frontiers in Public Health, 3, 241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00241
6. [6] Dzau, V. J., Sands, P., & Gostin, L. O. (2018). Public health and national security: The role of biosafety and biosecurity. The Lancet, 391(10136), 1864–1866. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30920-9
7. [7] Fauci, A. S., Morens, D. M., & Folkers, G. K. (2014). The challenge of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Nature, 513(7517), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13422
8. [8] Fletcher, E. R., & Payne, L. J. (2017). Biosafety education and risk perception in healthcare training environments. Journal of Hospital Infection, 96(3), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.03.012

9. [9] García, M., Rodriguez, P., & Santos, J. (2022). Blood-borne pathogen exposure and adherence to barrier precautions among midwifery students in clinical settings. Midwifery, 108, 103321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103321
10. [10] Güneş, U., Ayas, S., & Eraydın, Ş. (2019). Midwifery students' awareness of standard precautions: A descriptive study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 25(4), e12712. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12712
11. [11] Harding, A. L., & Byers, K. B. (2006). Epidemiology of laboratory-associated infections. In D. O. Fleming & D. L. Hunt (Eds.), Biological safety: Principles and practices (4th ed., pp. 53–77). ASM Press.
12. [12] Juni, M. H., & Khraisat, F. S. (2017). The impact of health education to reduce needle stick injury among nurses of private hospital in Jordan. International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences, 4(2), 84-94. e-ISSN : 2289-7577.
13. [13] Kaur, R., Singh, B., & Sharma, P. (2024). Digital transformation in biosafety education: Institutional strategies for virtual reality and simulation. Educational Research Review, 42, 100582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100582
14. [14] Kimman, T. G., Smit, E., & Klein, M. R. (2008). Evidence-based biosafety: A review of principles and effectiveness. Applied Biosafety, 13(4), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/153567600801300405
15. [15] Klotz, L. C., & Sylvester, E. J. (2018). The consequences of a lab accident: Ethics, risk perception, and biosafety culture. Health Security, 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2017.0054
16. [16] Lee, K., Kim, J., & Park, S. (2023). Reporting culture of laboratory accidents in universities: The role of institutional safety management. Safety Science, 164, 106124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106124
17. [17] Le Duc, J. W., & Anderson, K. (2017). Biosafety and biosecurity in laboratory settings. Future Virology, 12(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl-2016-0123
18. [18] Li, Q., Zhao, J., Yan, R., Gao, Q., Zhen, Y., Li, X., ... & Yang, L. (2024). WeChat mini program in laboratory biosafety education among medical students at Guangzhou Medical University: a mixed method study of feasibility and usability. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 305. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05131-9
19. [19] Lin, A. L., Doll, M. E., Pryor, R. J., Monsees, E. A., Nori, P., & Bearman, G. M. (2025). Healthcare workers’ attitudes and practices around environmental sustainability in infection prevention. Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology, 5(1), e94. https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.68
20. [20] Lopez, R., Martinez, E., & Silva, F. (2021). Aerosol-generating procedures and biosafety in dental education: A simulation-based training approach. Journal of Dental Research, 100(8), 850–857. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345211012345
21. [21] Miller, A. C., & Wijdicks, E. F. M. (2019). Ethical challenges and safety responsibilities in healthcare education and practice. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(3), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105192
22. [22] Morse, S. S., Mazet, J. A. K., Woolhouse, M., Parrish, C. R., Carroll, D., Karesh, W. B., … Daszak, P. (2012). Prediction and prevention of the next pandemic zoonosis. The Lancet, 380(9857), 1956–1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61684-5
23. [23] Mourad, A., Shrestha, L., & Baker, T. (2020). Non-punitive reporting cultures in healthcare education: Impact on biosafety compliance. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 545. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05456-w
24. [24] Muneer, S., Kayani, H. A., Ali, K., Asif, E., Zohra, R. R., & Kabir, F. (2021). Laboratory biosafety and biosecurity related education in Pakistan: Engaging students through the Socratic method of learning. Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 3(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2021.03.003
25. [25] O’Malley, G., Thompson, K., & Harris, M. (2021). Leadership and management in biosafety: Integrating safety into institutional strategy. Health Security, 19(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2021.0045
26. [26] Resnik, D. B. (2012). Ethical issues in biosafety and biosecurity. Accountability in Research, 19(5), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2012.720957
27. [27] Salmanzadeh, S., Rahmani, A., & Moradi, G. (2021). Biosafety knowledge, attitude, and practices among laboratory personnel and students. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 14(8), 1032–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.05.014
28. [28] Singh, K. (2017). Biosafety training and laboratory-acquired infections: Are we doing enough? Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(7), DE01–DE04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/27418.10186
29. [29] Sun, Y., & Liu, Q. (2026). Simulation-based biosafety education in health sciences: Impact on risk perception and safety behavior. Medical Education Online, 31(1), 2410987. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08572-6
30. [30] Su, Y., & Zeng, Y. (2023). Simulation based training versus non-simulation based training in anesthesiology: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heliyon, 9(8). [1] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18249
31. [31] Tucker, J. B. (2011). Laboratory safety and security in the biological sciences. Science, 331(6024), 1521–1522. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203710
32. [32] Turan, N., Kaya, H., & Aydın, G. Ö. (2022). Biosafety consciousness in nursing education: A focus on personal protective equipment and clinical risk management. Nurse Education Today, 110, 105260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105260
33. [33] Weiss, M. M., & McCarthy, M. (2019). Biosafety education in healthcare training programs. Journal of Nursing Education, 58(4), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20190321-03
34. [34] World Health Organization. (2020). Laboratory biosafety manual (4th ed.). World Health Organization.
35. [35] Wurtz, N., Papa, A., Hukic, M., Di Caro, A., Leparc-Goffart, I., Leroy, E., … Yazdanpanah, Y. (2016). Survey of laboratory-acquired infections around the world. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 35(12), 2017–2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2767-3