Measures of Transforming the Summative Assessment in Formative Assessment in Students Activities Evaluation at Constanta Maritime University

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1 11 Haziran 2015
  • Costel Stanca
  • Stefan Georgescu
  • Simona Mina
  • Ana Olteanu
PDF İndir
EN TR

-

Öz

Traditionally and within theoretical approaches, examiner’s report on courses at final exam in the universities consists of two components: firstly, there is a summative assessment where a judgment is made on a thesis that has met the standards established by the discipline for the award of the degree; second there is a conception about the development and the formative aspects of the exam, where examiners provide feedback to assist the students to improve their learning tasks. The main objective of this paper is to determine if periodically exams ‘students are primarily assessment or feedback? In this paper it is used feedback term referring on the trajectory of professor-student reports, in an effort to distinguish it clearly a summative assessment form. The small-scale study of four examiner’s reports aimed to identify the nature of them and whether the reports provided are primarily summative assessment or feedback

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Clynes, M. P., Reftery, S. E. C. (2008). Feedback: an essential element of student learning in clinical practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 8, 405-411
  2. Clynes, M. (2008). Providing feedback on clinical performance to student’s nurses in children’s nursing: challenges facing preceptors. Journal of children’s and young people’s nursing 2(1), 29-35
  3. Dohrenwend, A. (2002). Serving up the feedback sandwich. Family Practice Management 9 (10), 43- 49
  4. Eraut, M. Feedback. Learning in health and social care 5 (3), 111-118
  5. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ leraning. Learning and teaching in higher education, 13-29, Retrieved on 11 December 2013 from http://resources.glos.ac.uk
  6. Jerome, P.J. (1995). Coaching through effective feedback, Kogan, London
  7. Kiley, M. (2009). You don’t want a smart Alec’: Selecting examiners to assess doctoral dissertations. Studies in higher education, 34(8), 889-903
  8. Koh, L.C. (2007). Refocusing formative feedback to enhance learning in pre-registration nurse education. Nurse Education in practice.doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2007.08.00

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Costel Stanca Bu kişi benim

Stefan Georgescu Bu kişi benim

Simona Mina Bu kişi benim

Ana Olteanu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

11 Haziran 2015

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Haziran 2015

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2015 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Stanca, C., Georgescu, S., Mina, S., & Olteanu, A. (2015). -. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 32-47. https://izlik.org/JA74SK77JF
AMA
1.Stanca C, Georgescu S, Mina S, Olteanu A. -. JOISS. 2015;5(1):32-47. https://izlik.org/JA74SK77JF
Chicago
Stanca, Costel, Stefan Georgescu, Simona Mina, ve Ana Olteanu. 2015. “-”. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5 (1): 32-47. https://izlik.org/JA74SK77JF.
EndNote
Stanca C, Georgescu S, Mina S, Olteanu A (01 Haziran 2015) -. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5 1 32–47.
IEEE
[1]C. Stanca, S. Georgescu, S. Mina, ve A. Olteanu, “-”, JOISS, c. 5, sy 1, ss. 32–47, Haz. 2015, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA74SK77JF
ISNAD
Stanca, Costel - Georgescu, Stefan - Mina, Simona - Olteanu, Ana. “-”. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5/1 (01 Haziran 2015): 32-47. https://izlik.org/JA74SK77JF.
JAMA
1.Stanca C, Georgescu S, Mina S, Olteanu A. -. JOISS. 2015;5:32–47.
MLA
Stanca, Costel, vd. “-”. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 5, sy 1, Haziran 2015, ss. 32-47, https://izlik.org/JA74SK77JF.
Vancouver
1.Costel Stanca, Stefan Georgescu, Simona Mina, Ana Olteanu. -. JOISS [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2015;5(1):32-47. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA74SK77JF