General Trends in National Research on Web-Based Instruction in Science Education: A Meta-Synthesis Study

Abstract

This study analyzes Turkish studies on web-based instruction in the field of science education using the meta-synthesis method with the aim of determining the general trends of the analyzed studies. A total of 20 studies published between 2006 and 2022, including 7 doctoral dissertations, 11 master theses, and 2 journal articles, were analyzed with a qualitative research design. These studies were identified using the databases of the YÖK National Thesis Center, EBSCO, Google Scholar, and ProQuest. The studies were analyzed using a coding form that included ten categories: year of publication, type of publication, purpose of the research, method, data collection tools, data analysis method, grade level, sample size, learning domain, and outcome of the research. The obtained data were interpreted according to the specified categories. It was concluded that a significant portion of the analyzed studies were conducted with the aim of examining web-based instruction and Web 2.0 tools, mixed research designs and semi-structured interview forms were most often used, most studies were conducted with students in the 6th and 7th grades, and web-based instruction was generally found to be more effective than traditional instruction. This study provides an overview of research on web-based instruction in the field of science education, serves as a resource for future research, and offers new ideas and suggestions for researchers in this field.

Keywords

• science education
• ınternet
• web-based ınstruction

References

1. Ahi, B. & Kıldan, A. O. (2013). Investigation of Postgraduate Theses in the Field of Preschool Education in Turkey (2002-2011). Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Faculty of Education, 1(27), 23-46.
2. Ahmed, A., & Williams, H. (1997). Numeracy Project: A Catalyst for Teacher Development and Teachers Researching. Teacher Development, 1(3), 357-374.
3. Akgündüz, D. (2013). The Effect of Blended Learning in Science Education and social media Supported Learning on Students’ Achievement, Motivation, Attitude and Self-Learning Skills. Doctoral Dissertation, Marmara University, Turkey.
4. Aktaş, M. (2013). The Effect of Web Based Distance Education on Students’ Academic Achievement and Attitudes in Science and Technology Course. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak.
5. Aktay, S. (2015). Web-Based Portfolio (Webfolio) Application in Primary Education. Doctoral Dissertation, Anadolu University, Turkey.
6. Altıparmak, M., & Deren, Ş. (2010). Technology Supported Collaborative Group Research Methods Based on Constructivist Approach in Science Teaching. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(3), 697-717.
7. Aslan, S. S., & Aybek, B. (2018). Investigation of Primary School Fourth Grade Students’ Perceptions of Tolerance Value: A Phenomenological Study. Journal of National Education, 47(217), 97-110.
8. Aydın, İ. E., Kaya, S., İşkol, S., & İşcan, A. (2019). Content Analysis of Master’s and Doctoral Theses Published in Anadolu University Distance Education Department. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 3, 430-441.

9. Bacanak, A. (2008). Investigation of the Effectiveness of the Web-Based Program Created for Science and Technology Course Performance Evaluation Forms. Doctoral thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, 2008.
10. Baki, A. & Gökçek, T. (2012). An Overview of Mixed Method Research. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11(42), 1-21.
11. Ballıel, B. (2014). The Effect of Webquest Supported Cooperative Learning Approach on Learning Products. Unpublished master thesis. Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences: Ankara.
12. Başaran, M., Ülger, I. G., Demirtaş, M., Kara, E., Geyik, C., & Vural, Ö. F. (2021). Investigation of Teachers’ Technology Use in Distance Education Process. OPUS International Journal of Society Research, 17(37), 4619- 4645.
13. Bayrak, B. (2011). The Effect of Science and Technology Teaching Supported by Problem-Based Instruction in Web Environment on Eighth Grade Students’ Academic Achievement, Conceptual Understanding and Scientific Process Skills: Acid Base Issue. Doctoral Dissertation, Marmara University, Turkey.
14. Can, Ş. (2008). Web Based İnstruction in Science Teaching. Master thesis, Celal Bayar University, Manisa.
15. Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods (Trans. Ed.: Whole, M., & Demir, S.B.). Ankara: Political Publications Distribution.
16. Çataloğlu, E., & Ateşkan, A. (2014). Exemplifying the Use of QR (Quick Response) Code in Education and Training. Ilkogretim Online, 13(1), 5-14.
17. Çelik, Ö. (2017). Evaluation of Secondary School Science Course Sixth Grade Curriculum in Terms of the Theme of Systems in Our Body: The Case of Konya City Center. Doctoral Dissertation, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey.
18. Çetin, O., & Günay, Y. (2010). The Effect of Web-Based Instruction in Science Education on Students’ Academic Achievement and Attitudes. Çukurova University Journal of Faculty of Education, 3(38), 19-34.
19. Dağ, F. & Kırıkkaya, E. B. (2012). Preparation of Eighth Grade Web-Based Teaching Material for Natural Processes Unit: Opinions of Different Field Experts about the Material. Education Sciences, 7(1), 212-229.
20. Dewitt-Brinks, D., & Rhodes, S. C. (1992). Listening Instruction: A Qualitative Meta analysis of Twenty-Four Selected Studies (ED351721). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED351721.pdf
21. Durak Men, D. (2018). The Effect of Web-Based Instruction on Science Achievement and Attitude Towards Science Lesson: A Metaanalysis Study. Master’s Thesis, Cumhuriyet University Institute of Educational Sciences, Sivas.
22. Durmuş, S., & Karakırık, E. (2005). A Computer Assessment Tool for a Structural Communication Grid. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology/ TOJET, 4(4), 3-6.
23. Dönmez, İ., & Gülen, S. (2021). Current Research Trends in Science Education in Turkey: An Examination of 2020 Graduate Theses. Journal of Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Faculty of Education, 22(3), 1884-1924.
24. Ekemen, M.(2022). Social Media Supported Science Enriched with Web 2.0 Tools Instruction on 6th Grade Students' Social Media Use, Digital Effects on Literacy Levels and Critical Thinking Skills Review. Master's Thesis, Marmara University, Educational Sciences Institute, Istanbul, 743028.
25. Erdoğan, A. (2022). Evaluation of a Training for Using Web 2.0 Tools in the Teaching Process of Pre-service Science Teachers. Tools in the Teaching Process to Prospective Science Teachers. Master Thesis, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Institute of Science and Technology, Rize, 725541.
26. Glesne, C. (2013). Introduction to Qualitative Research (Trans. Ed.: Ersoy, A., & Yalcinoglu, P.). Ankara: Anı Publishing.
27. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
28. Gül, R. (2022). The Effect of Online Education Supported by Web 2.0 Tools on the Conceptual Achievement, Attitudes and SelfRegulation Perceptions of 5th Grade Middle School Students in the Sun, Earth and Moon Unit. Master Thesis. Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul, 722173.
29. Gümüş, S. (2018). Systematic Review of Qualitative Research: Meta synthesis. In Research in Educational Administration (pp. 533-550), Ankara: Pegem A.
30. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
31. Kaçaroğlu, A. (2022). A Content Analysis of Master’s Theses in the Field of Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020-2021). Master Thesis. Pamukkale University, Denizli.
32. Karagöz, F. (2010). The Effectiveness of Web Assisted Instruction Method in Elementary Science and Technology Course. Master's Thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences.
33. Karaman, S. (2007). Course Web Pages: Characteristics, Preparation, Use and Attitudes of Instructors. Journal of Inonu University Faculty of Education, 7(13), 47-68.
34. Karataş, Z. (2017). Paradigm Shift in Social Science Research: The Rise of Qualitative Approach. Turkish Journal of Social Work Research, 1(1), 68-86.
35. Khalifa, M., & Lam, R. (2002). Web-based learning: Effects on learning process and outcome. IEEE Transactions on Education, 45(4), 350-356.
36. Kıral, B. (2020). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Data Analysis Method. Siirt University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 8(15), 170-189.
37. Koran, Ç. (2022). Meta-Synthesis of Design-Based Learning Studies in Turkey. Master’s Thesis, Atatürk University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Erzurum, 748737.
38. Koruk, S. Ş. (2021). Investigation of the Effect of the Topic of Cell Divisions Integrated with Computational Thinking Skills in an Online Learning Environment on the Computational Thinking Skills, Creativity and Academic Achievement of Middle School 7th grade students (Doctoral Dissertation, Marmara University (Turkey)).
39. Koyuncu, İ. (2022). Research on Culture in Turkish as a Second/Foreign Language Textbooks: A Meta-Synthesis Study. Master's Thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara.
40. Köse Biber, S. (2009). The Effect of Web Supported Science Teaching on the Performance Level and Academic Achievement of Primary School seventh Grade Students in Inclusive Education (Master’s Thesis, Graduate School of Science and Technology).
41. Köse, M. (2022). Evaluation of Analogies in Science Textbooks. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 11(1), 112-126.
42. Küçük, A., & Küçük, M., (2021). A Descriptive Content Analysis of COVID-19 Outbreak Research on Pre-School Education in Turkey. In IV. International COVID-19 and Current Issues Congress (ss. 93-104). İstanbul, Türkiye.
43. Küçüközer, A. (2016). An Overview of Doctoral Theses in the Field of Science Education. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), https://doi.org/10.17522/nefefmed.54132
44. Melis, E., Andres, E., Budenbender, J., Frischauf, A., Goduadze, G., Libbrecht, P., ... & Ullrich, C. (2001). ActiveMath: A generic and adaptive web-based learning environment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 12, 385-407.
45. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
46. Oral, B., & Kenanoğlu, R. (2012). The Effect of Web-Based Distance Education Systems on Student Achievement and Attitudes Towards Computers. Electronic Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(2), 58-67.
47. Özdemir, A., Tanoba, T., Karaokur, Ş., & Tonyalı, Ö. (2021). Typological and Methodological Trends in Mixed Method Theses in Educational Sciences in Turkey. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 54(54), 23-53.
48. Özgen, Y. (2017). The Effect of Web Supported Instruction in Plant and Animal Reproduction, Growth and Development Unit on 6th Grade Students’ Academic Achievement, Remembrance and Attitudes Towards Science (Doctoral Dissertation, Marmara University (Turkey)).
49. Polat, S., & Ay, O. (2016). Meta-synthesis: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 4(2), 52-64.
50. Pürbudak, A. (2020). Experimental Investigation of Web 2.0 Based Collaborative Group Activities in the Context of Learning Styles. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya.
51. Sevim, S., & Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2016). The Effect of Web-Based Instruction on Science and Technology Course. Bayburt Education Faculty Journal, 7(2), 1-19.
52. Şendağ, S., & Gündüz, Ş. (2007). Prospective Teachers' Web-Based Learning Opinions on the Usability and Effectiveness of the Material. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Faculty of Education, 8(14),137-149. Tarman, B., Acun, İ., & Yüksel, Z. (2010). Theses in the Field of Social Studies Education Evaluation. Gaziantep University-Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 725-746.
53. Taşkıran, Y., Sertbaş, K., Gönener, A., & Atalı, L. (2003). Investigation of Computer Use Status of Kocaeli University School of Physical Education and Sports Students. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2(1), 129-132.
54. Taş, E. (2006). Developing, İmplementing and Evaluating of a Web Designed Science Material. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon.
55. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1- 10.
56. Toraman, S. (2021). Mixed Methods Research: Short History, Definition, Perspectives and Basic Concepts/Mixed Methods Research: A Brief History, Definitions, Perspectives, and Key Elements. Qualitative Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-29.
57. Türnüklü, A. (2000). A Qualitative Research Technique that can be Used Effectively in Educational Science Research: Interview. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 24(24), 543-559.
58. Uzunboylu, H. (2004). The effectiveness of web-assisted English language teaching on students' achievement and attitude (pp. 727-733). Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education (AACE).
59. Ültay, N., & Çalık, M. (2012). A Thematic Review of Studies on the Effectiveness of Context-Based Chemistry Curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 686-701.
60. Wach, E., & Ward, R. (2013). Learning About Qualitative Document Analysis. IDS Practice Paper in Brief, ILT Brief 13 August 2013.
61. Weed, M. (2005). "Meta Interpretation": A Method for the Interpretive Synthesis of Qualitative Research. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.1.508
62. Yapıcı, B. (2019). The Effect of Educational Informatics Network on Students’ Academic Success in the Teaching of Living Things and Energy Relationships Unit (Master's Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences).
63. Yaylacı, Z., & Büyükalan, S. (2020). Thematic Analysis of Theses Referred to Teacher Opinion in Social Studies Education (2005-2017). Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 20(1), 1-19. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. Seçkin Publishing, Ankara, 446.
64. Yurdabakan, İ. (2011). View of Constructivist Theory on Assessment: Alternative Assessment Methods in Education. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 44(1), 51-78.