The Effect of Micro:Bit Applications on Middle School Students' Attitudes Towards Coding

Abstract

Flipped classrooms have recently emerged as a very innovative approach in teaching and learning English as a Second Language, more specifically by the ESL teacher candidates in higher education institutions. The present study investigated the perceived benefits and challenges of flipped learning in the context of ESL teacher candidates. The subjects of the present study were 50 participants who underwent a structured survey, out of which 10 participants were randomly chosen for in-depth interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. The results showed that flipped learning increases student engagement, promotes collaborative learning, and allows for more individualized instruction; some of the challenges noted in this study involved various technological problems and initial resistance from students. This study highlights how the flipped classroom model can transform language education through active learning and enhancement of critical thinking skills among ESL teacher candidates. These findings therefore gave good lessons that can be learnt by educators who wish to apply flipped learning; potential challenges such as access to technology and the preparedness of students have to be considered in implementing it. This study underlines continuous needs for professional development on the part of educators in adopting new teaching methodologies and points toward the future of studies in terms of the long-term effects of flipped learning in ESL contexts.

Keywords

• Attitude
• Coding
• Micro:bit
• Middle School Students

References

1. Baker, J. W. (2000). The classroom flip: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. T.H.E. Journal, 27(7), 26-34.
2. Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23-1200).
3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
5. Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. (2010). Getting real about fixing school reform. University of Chicago Press. Donato, R. (2000). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In P. D. Ochsner (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages (pp. 99-116). Routledge.
6. Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Pearson Education.
7. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press. Gere, A. R., Buehler, J., Dallavis, C., & Haviland, V. S. (2009). A visibility project: Learning to see how preservice teachers take up culturally responsive pedagogy.
8. Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Management Education, 39(3), 170-194.

9. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. Jang, H. Y., & Kim, H. J. (2020). A meta-analysis of the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal outcomes of flipped classrooms in higher education. Education Sciences, 10(4), 115.
10. Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140.
11. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget’s theory.
12. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). I Major language trends in twentieth-century language teaching. Approaches and methods in language teaching, 1-2.
13. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
14. Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Continuum.
15. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
16. Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom: Online instruction at Duke University. Educause Review, 47(1), 22-27.
17. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. G. (Ed.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79-91). Harvard University Press. Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. Jossey-Bass.