A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students

Gülten Koşar

doi:10.53850/joltida.1782071

A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students

Abstract

This mixed-methods case study examines an English instructor’s and university preparatory school Turkish EFL students’ (N = 12) perceptions of their lived fully asynchronous online English language teaching and learning experiences. The quantitative data was gathered from an online language learning questionnaire, and the qualitative one was collected from the open-ended questions in the questionnaire, a semi-structured interview conducted with the student participants and a qualitative survey responded to by the English instructor. The findings demonstrated compatibility between the students and instructor’s views on the ineffectiveness of the fully asynchronous online English language teaching and learning as both parties stated it did not promote students’ English language learning due to the absence of the interaction amongst the students and English instructors. The findings also indicated the necessity of stimulating student participation in online lessons to generate and strengthen online English language learners’ motivation and sustaining their interests in online lessons.

Keywords

English instructors, online English language teaching, online English language learning, mixed-methods case study, university preparatory school EFL students

Ethical Statement

The ethical approval was obtained from the ethical review board of Hatay Mustafa Kemal University with the document numbered 902-01-FR 006, date and file number, 20/01/2021-5887, E-21817443-050.99-5887.

References

Abe, J. A. A. (2020). Big five, linguistic styles, and successful online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 1-9.
Adams, B. L. M., Jones, W. M., & Cohen, J. (2016). Learning to teach online: a systematic review of the literature on K-12 teacher preparation for teaching online. Distance Education, 37(3), 333-348.
Alhamami, M. (2018). Beliefs about and intention to learn a foreign language in face-to-face and online settings. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1-2), 90-113.
Bashori, M., Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2020). Web-based language learning and speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Doi: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1770293
Blake, R. J. (2011). Current trends in online language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 19-35. Canals, L., & Rawashdeh, A. A. (2019). Teacher training and teachers’ attitudes towards educational technology in the deployment of online English language courses in Jordan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 639-664.
Chang, H., & Windeatt, S. (2016). Developing collaborative learning practices in an online language course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1271-1286.
Compton, L. K. L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73-99.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research methods. Pearson.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.

de Oliveira, L. C., & Olesova, L. (2017). Learning about the Literacy Development of English Language Learners in Asynchronous Online Discussions. Journal of Education, 193(2), 15-24.
del Rosal, K., Conry, J., & Wu, S. (2017). Exploring the fluid online identities of language teachers and adolescent language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(5), 390-408.
Eslami, Z. R., & Kung, W. T. (2016). Focus-on-form and EFL learners’ language development in synchronous computer-mediated communication: task-based interactions. The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 401-417.
Foster, I. (2019). The future of language learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(3), 261-269.
Gazan, M. (2020). Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Learning: Perceptions of Students at a State University in Turkey, 1, 96-107.
Hampel, R. (2009). Training teachers for the multimedia age: developing teacher expertise to enhance online learner interaction and collaboration. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 35-50.
Heins, B., Duensing, A., Stickler, U., & Batstone, C. (2007). Spoken interaction in online and face-to-face language tutorials. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 279-295.
Henry, M., Carroll, F., Cunliffe, D., & Kop, R. (2018). Learning a minority language through authentic conversation using an online social learning method. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 321-345.
Ho, W. Y. J. (2019). ‘I knew that you were there, so I was talking to you’: the use of screen-recording videos in online language learning research. Qualitative Research. Doi.org/10.1177/1468794119885044
Hopkins, J. E. (2010). Distance language learners' perceptions of assessed, student-led speaking tasks via a synchronous audiographic conferencing tool. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 235-258.
Hromalik, C. D., & Koszalka, D. A. (2018). Self-regulation of the use of digital resources in an online language learning course improves learning outcomes. Distance Education, 39(4), 528-547.
Lai, C., Shum, M., & Tian, Y. (2016). Enhancing learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning: the effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 40-60.
Lamb, M., & Arisandy, F. E. (2020). The impact of online use of English on motivation to learn. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 85-108.
Lawrence, G. (2013). A working model for intercultural learning and engagement in collaborative online language learning environments. Intercultural Education, 24(4), 303-314.
Lin, C. H., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, B. (2017). The roles of learning strategies and motivation in online language learning: A structural equation modeling analysis. Computers & Education, 113, 75-85.
MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2020). Language teachers’ coping strategies during the Covid-19 conversion to online teaching: Correlations with stress, wellbeing and negative emotions. System, 94, 1-13.
Manegre, M., & Sabiri, K. A. (2020). Online language learning using virtual classrooms: An analysis of teacher perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Doi: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1770290
Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2014). Managing synchronous polyfocality in new media/new learning: Online language educators’ instructional strategies. System, 42, 177-188.
Moore, M. (1980). Independent study. In R. Boyd, J. W. Apps and Associates (Eds.), Redefining the discipline of adult education (pp. 16-31). Jossey-Bass.
Moradimokhles, H., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). The effect of online vs. blended learning in developing English language skills by nursing student: an experimental study. Interactive Learning Environments. Doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.19658739079
Murday, K., Ushida, E., & Chenoweth, A. (2008). Learners' and teachers' perspectives on language online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 125-142.
Murphy, L., Shelley, M., & Baumann, U. (2010). Qualities of effective tutors in distance language teaching: Student perceptions. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 119-136.
Nor, N. F. M., Hamat, A., & Embi, M. A. (2012). Patterns of discourse in online interaction: seeking evidence of the collaborative learning process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(3), 237-256.
Okyar, H. (2022). University-level EFL students’ views on learning English online: A qualitative study. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 81-107.
Pleines, C. (2020). Understanding vicarious participation in online language learning. Distance Education. Doi: 10.1080/01587919.2020.1821605
Qian, K., & McCormick, R. (2014). Building course cohesion: the use of online forums in distance Chinese language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 44-69.
Quinn, A. C., de los Arcos, B., & Mardomingo, R. (2012). Virtual learning environments (VLEs) for distance language learning: Shifting tutor roles in a contested space for interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(2), 129-143.
Richards, J. C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC journal, 46(1), 5-22.
Rienties, B., Lewis, T., McFarlane, R., Nguyen, Q., & Toetenel, L. (2018). Analytics in online and offline language learning environments: The role of learning design to understand student online engagement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 273-293.
Sampson, R. J., & Yoshida, R. (2020). L2 feelings through interaction in a Japanese-English online chat exchange. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2019.1710514
Schulze, M., & Scholz, K. (2018). Learning trajectories and the role of online courses in a language program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 185-205.
Senior, R. (2010). Connectivity: A framework for understanding effective language teaching in face-to-face and online learning communities. RELC Journal, 41(2), 137-147.
Stickler, U., & Shi, L. (2013). Supporting Chinese speaking skills online. System, 41, 50-69.
Su, Y., Li, Y., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Moving literature circles into wiki-based environment: The role of online self-regulation in EFL learners’ attitude toward collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), 556-586.
Such, B. (2019). Scaffolding English language learners for online collaborative writing activities. Interactive Learning Environments. Doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1579233
Sun, S. Y. H. (2014). Learner perspectives on fully online language learning. Distance Education, 35(1), 18-42.
Stickler, U., Batstone, C., Duensing, A., & Heins, B. (2005). Distance and virtual distance: Preliminary results of a study of interaction patterns in synchronous audio graphic CMC and face-to-face tutorials in beginners’ language tutorials. Proceedings of the 2004 international symposium on applied linguistics and language teaching (pp. 470-750). University of Northern Iowa.
Tadayonifar, M., & Entezari, M. (2020). Does flipped learning affect language skills and learning styles differently? E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(4), 324-340.
Taghizadeh, M., & Yourdshahi, Z. H. (2020). Integrating technology into young learners' classes: language teachers' perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(8), 982-1006.
Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2015). University teachers’ perceptions of Online Informal Learning of English (OILE). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 7-21.
Tratnik, A., Urh, A., & Jereb, E. (2019). Student satisfaction with an online and a face-to-face Business English course in a higher education context. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(1), 36-45.
Tseng, M. F., Lin, C. H., & Chen, H. (2018). An immersive flipped classroom for learning Mandarin Chinese: design, implementation, and outcomes. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 714-733.
Wang, Y. C. (2014). Using wikis to facilitate interaction and collaboration among EFL learners: A social constructivist approach to language teaching. System, 42, 383-390.
Wang, Y., Chen, N. S., & Levy, M. (2010). Teacher training in a synchronous cyber face-to-face classroom: Characterizing and supporting the online teachers’ learning process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 277-293.
Winke, P., Goertler, S., & Amuzie, G. L. (2010). Commonly taught and less commonly taught language learners: are they equally prepared for CALL and online language learning? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 199-219.
Wong, R. (2020). When no one can go to school: does online learning meet students’ basic learning needs? When no one can go to school: does online learning meet students’ basic learning needs? Interactive Learning Environments. Doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1789672
Xu, B., Cheng, N. S., & Cheng, G. (2020). Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-Based online discussion learning. Computers & Education, 157, 1-11.
Zhang, K., & Wu, H. (2022). Synchronous Online Learning During COVID-19: Chinese University EFL Students’ Perspectives. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1-10.
Zhang, W., & Cheng, Y. (2012). Quality assurance in e-learning: PDPP evaluation model and its application. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 66–82.
Zhen, B., Lin, C. H., & Kwon, J. B. (2020). The impact of learner-, instructor-, and course-level factors on online learning. Computers & Education, 150, 1-11.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Information Systems User Experience Design and Development

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Gülten Koşar ^*
0000-0002-4687-4382
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 12, 2026

Submission Date

September 11, 2025

Acceptance Date

February 19, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 11 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1782071

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA44PG78TW

APA

Koşar, G. (2026). A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 11(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1782071

AMA

1.Koşar G. A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students. JOLTIDA. 2026;11(2):1-12. doi:10.53850/joltida.1782071

Chicago

Koşar, Gülten. 2026. “A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students”. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age 11 (2): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1782071.

EndNote

Koşar G (March 1, 2026) A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age 11 2 1–12.

IEEE

[1]G. Koşar, “A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students”, JOLTIDA, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.53850/joltida.1782071.

ISNAD

Koşar, Gülten. “A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students”. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age 11/2 (March 1, 2026): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1782071.

JAMA

1.Koşar G. A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students. JOLTIDA. 2026;11:1–12.

MLA

Koşar, Gülten. “A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students”. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, vol. 11, no. 2, Mar. 2026, pp. 1-12, doi:10.53850/joltida.1782071.

Vancouver

1.Gülten Koşar. A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students. JOLTIDA. 2026 Mar. 1;11(2):1-12. doi:10.53850/joltida.1782071

Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age 2023. This is an Open Access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.

Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age. Open Access Journal, 2023. ISSN:2458-8350

A Mixed Methods Case Study into Fully Asynchronous Online English Language Teaching and Learning: Through the Lens of an English Instructor and University Preparatory School Students

Abstract

Keywords

Ethical Statement

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite