EFFECT OF SLOPE ON REPRODUCTION MORPHOLOGY AND QUALITY IN NATURAL REGENERATION OF BRUTIAN PINE

Öz

In this study, effect of slope on reproduction morphology (called also as seedling in this study) in natural regenerations of Brutian pine (Pinus brutia) to contribute natural regeneration and other forestry practices was examined based on seedling height and root-collar diameter by data collected from four years old natural seedlings sampled over slope ranges (S) at end of growth period of 2020. Averages of seedling height were 97.7 cm for upper (S>40%), 96.7 cm for middle (30%<S<40%) and 106.3 cm for low (S<30%) slopes, while averages of root-collar diameter were 24.0 mm, 23.8 mm, and 24.6 mm, respectively. The results showed that lowest slope had higher growth performance than others. There were large differences within slope, and among slopes (p<0.05) according to results of analysis of variance for the characteristics. Relations between seedling height and root-collar (r=0.67, 0.70, and 0.76) were positive (p<0.05) in each slope and polled slopes (r=0.81). All seedlings of low slope were in first seedling quality class of Turkish Standard Institute, while it was 93.6% for upper slope and 96.6% for middle slope.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Brutian pine
• correlation
• growth
• variation

Kaynakça

1. 1. Anonymous (1988). Seedling quality classification of coniferous. Turkish Standard Institute Press.
2. 2. Anonymous (2020). Forestry statistics of Turkey. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara.
3. 3. Bilir, N. & Çetinkaya, D. (2018). Morphological Characteristics in Seed Orchard and Seed Stand Seedlings of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.). 2 International Congress on Multidisciplinary, May 4-5, p. 57-62.
4. 4. Bilir, N. (2019). Seedling Quality in Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.). The Journal of Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 10(1), 95-101.
5. 5. Çatal, Y., Güzel, B. & Genç, M. (2017). Determination of Free-to-Grow Stages of Natural Mixed Brutian Pine-Anatolian Black Pine Stands. Turkish Journal of Forest Sciences, 1(17), 145-154.
6. 6. Çerçioğlu, M. & Bilir, N. (2016). Seed Source Effect on Quality and Morphology of Turkish Red Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Seedlings. Reforesta, 2, 1-5.
7. 7. Çetinkaya, D. (2019). Utilization Possibility from Advanced Regeneration in Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.). IJSRM., 14(2), 108-115.
8. 8. Çifçioğlu, I. (1998). The Study of Success Status in Generation Activities Made for the Model Plan of Karaisalı Forest Management, Istanbul University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Msc. Thesis, Istanbul.

9. 9. Dilaver, M. Seyedi, N. & Bilir, N. (2015). Seedling Quality and Morphology in Seed Sources and Seedling Type of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.). World Journal of Agricultural Research, 3 (2), 83-85.
10. 10. Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple Range and Multiple F Tests. Biometrics, 11, 1–42.
11. 11. Özel, H.B., Yücedağ, C., Bilir, N., Ölmez, Z. & Aydınhan, V. (2018). The Effect of Seedling Types on Morphological Characteristics in Turkish Red Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Seedlings. Bartın University International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 1, 43-47.
12. 12. Şırlak, U. (1978). Die Forschung Über die Nutzanwendung Möglichkeiten der Vorhandenen Naturverjüngungen und Über Deren Bedingungen von Hartkiefer (Pinus brutia Ten.). Forest Research Institute Technical Bullettin, 110.
13. 13. Üçler, A.Ö., Gülcü, S. & Bilir, N. (2000). Interaction between Seed Sources and Seedling Properties on Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia) and Black Pine (Pinus nigra). Second Seedling Symposium, Ege University, September 25-29.
14. 14. Yazıcı, N. (2021). Effect of Aspect on Growth Performance of Natural Regenerations in Brutian Pine. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS), 8, 10-13.
15. 15. Yılmazer, C. & Bilir, N. (2016). Effect of Seedling Type in Morphology and Quality of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Seedlings. IJSRST., 2(5), 237-240.