Kargılı Recreation Area Landscape Design Process

Öz

Recreation areas are open areas where urban people spend their free time. There is a lack of areas where residents of Büyükkabaca sub-district can establish social togetherness, spend their free time and engage in recreational activities. Within the scope of this study, Kargılı Recreation Area Landscape Design Project was prepared by the academic staff of Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Architecture Department of Landscape Architecture upon the request of Büyükkabaca Municipality. The recreation project included cafes, picnic areas, observation terraces, car parking lots, prayer areas, restrooms, children's playgrounds, and controlled entry and exit gates. In the planting design process of the project, native species of the region that use water more effectively or exotic species adapted to the region were used. The problems encountered during the project design process were stated and solutions to these problems were suggested. Additionally, detailed information is given about the usage areas and facilities in the project.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Büyükkabaca
• Isparta
• Landscape Project
• Public Space Design
• Recreational Facilities.

Etik Beyan

The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics, and ethics committee approval is not required for the study. The author would like to thank the Büyükkabaca Municipality staff for their contributions to the project process.

Kargılı Rekreasyon Alanı Peyzaj Tasarım Süreci

Öz

Rekreasyon alanları kent insanının serbest zamanlarını değerlendirdikleri açık alanlardır. Büyükkabaca beldesi sakinlerinin sosyal birliktelik kurabilecekleri, serbest zamanlarını değerlendirebilecekleri, rekreasyonel faaliyetlerde bulunabilecekleri alanların eksikliği hissedilmektedir. Bu çalışma kapsamında Büyükkabaca Belediyesi'nin talebi üzerine Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü akademik personeli tarafından Kargılı Rekreasyon Alanı Peyzaj Tasarım Projesi hazırlanmıştır. Rekreasyon projesinde kafe, piknik alanları, seyir terasları, otoparklar, ibadet alanlar, tuvaletler, çocuk oyun alanları, kontrollü giriş çıkış kapılarına yer verilmiştir. Projenin bitkisel tasarım sürecinde suyu daha etkin kullanan bölgenin doğal türleri veya bölgeye adapte olmuş egzotik türler kullanışmıştır. Proje tasarım sürecinde karşılaşılan sorunlar belirtilmiş ve bu sorunlara çözüm önerileri getirilmiştir. Ayrıca, projedeki kullanım alanları ve tesisler hakkında detaylı bilgi verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Büyükkabaca
• Isparta
• Peyzaj Projesi
• Kamusal Alan Tasarımı
• Rekreasyon Tesisleri.

Etik Beyan

The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics, and ethics committee approval is not required for the study. The author would like to thank the Büyükkabaca Municipality staff for their contributions to the project process.

Kaynakça

1. Akpınar, A. (2019). Green exercise: how are characteristics of urban green spaces associated with adolescents’ physical activity and health?. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(21), 4281.
2. Aksoy, Y. & Arslan, O. (2019). Effects of Recreational Activity on Leisure Barriers between Students. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 5(4), 569-574.
3. Altan, Y., Kerman, U., Aktel, M., Metin, Y. & Erdal, E. (2013). Yerel yönetimlerde kamu özel ortaklığı uygulaması: Büyükkabaca Belediyesi örneği. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(3), 9-17.
4. Baker, D. A. & Palmer, R. J. (2006). Examining the effects of perceptions of community and recreation participation on quality of life. Social indicators research, 75, 395-418.
5. Baklien, B., Ytterhus, B. & Bongaardt, R. (2016). When everyday life becomes a storm on the horizon: Families’ experiences of good mental health while hiking in nature. Anthropology & medicine, 23(1), 42-53.
6. Büyükkabaca Municipality. (2023). Büyükkabaca–Population Information. https://www.buyukkabaca.bel.tr/buyukkabaca-nufus-bilgileri/ Access date: October 10, 2023.
7. Cavnar, M. M., Kirtland, K. A., Evans, M. H., Wilson, D. K., Williams, J. E., Mixon, G. M. & Henderson, K. A. (2004). Evaluating the Quality of Recreation Facilities: Development of an Assessment Tool. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 22(1).
8. Chiang, L., Xu, A., Kim, J., Tang, L. & Manthiou, A. (2017). Investigating festivals and events as social gatherings: The application of social identity theory. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(6), 779-792.

9. Cole, J. S. & Scott, D. (1999). Segmenting participation in wildlife watching: A comparison of casual wildlife watchers and serious birders. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 4(4), 44-61.
10. Crompton, J. L. (2001). The impact of parks on property values: A review of the empirical evidence. Journal of leisure research, 33(1), 1-31.
11. Dinç, G., & Gül, A. (2022). Estimation of Effective Spatial Variables When Visiting Public Squares through Factor Analysis Model. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 148(3).
12. Faragallah, R. N. (2018). The impact of productive open spaces on urban sustainability: The case of El Mansheya Square–Alexandria. Alexandria engineering journal, 57(4), 3969-3976.
13. Google Earth. (2023). Map data ©2023 Google. Access date: October 10, 2023.
14. Gül, A., Küçük, V., Eraslan, Ş., Evci, A. & Çakır, M. (2016). Isparta Büyükkabaca Belediyesi Kargılı Mesire Alanı Peyzaj Tasarım Projesi. SDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü, Isparta, 26.02.2016-16.12.2016.
15. Hasani, M., Sakieh, Y. & Khammar, S. (2017). Measuring satisfaction: analyzing the relationships between sociocultural variables and functionality of urban recreational parks. Environment, development and sustainability, 19, 2577-2594.
16. Irshad, H. (2011). Impacts of community events and festivals on rural places. Government of Alberta, Agriculture and Rural Development Division.
17. Jennings, V. & Bamkole, O. (2019). The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: An avenue for health promotion. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(3), 452.
18. Jian, I. Y., Luo, J. & Chan, E. H. (2020). Spatial justice in public open space planning: Accessibility and inclusivity. Habitat International, 97, 102122.
19. Kara, B., Tuncay, H. E. & Deniz, B. (2011). Investigating recreational qualities of the parks in Aydın. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 158-164.
20. Kristi, R. & Simanjuntak, I. B. H. (2018). Evaluation of the Aesthetic and Social Function of the Bendosari Park Salatiga City. Indonesian Journal of Computing and Modeling, 1(2), 87-92.
21. Lee, H. S., Shepley, M. & Huang, C. S. (2009). Evaluation of off-leash dog parks in Texas and Florida: A study of use patterns, user satisfaction, and perception. Landscape and urban planning, 92(3-4), 314-324.
22. Lloret, J., Gómez, S., Rocher, M., Carreño, A., San, J. & Inglés, E. (2023). The potential benefits of water sports for health and well-being in marine protected areas: A case study in the Mediterranean. Annals of Leisure Research, 26(4), 601-627.
23. McFarlane, B. L. (2004). Recreation specialization and site choice among vehicle-based campers. Leisure Sciences, 26(3), 309-322.
24. McLemore, V. T. & Dunbar, N. (2000). Rockhound State Park and Spring Canyon Recreation Area. New Mexico Geology, 22, 66-71.
25. MacLennan, P. (2000). Visitor information as a management tool. Science and Research Internal Report, 180.
26. Metcalf, E. C. & Nickerson, N. P. (2013). MT SCORP: Facility and Natural Resource Recreation Area Needs: Facility Manager Responses, 2012.
27. Panagopoulos, T., Duque, J. A. G. & Dan, M. B. (2016). Urban planning with respect to environmental quality and human well-being. Environmental pollution, 208, 137-144.
28. Pidlisna, O., Simonova, A., Ivanova, N., Bondarenko, V. & Yesipov, A. (2023). Harmonisation of the urban environment by means of visual art, lighting design, and architecture. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 22(1), 59-72.
29. Puhakka, R., Pitkänen, K. & Siikamäki, P. (2017). The health and well-being impacts of protected areas in Finland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(12), 1830-1847.
30. Reeder, R. J. & Brown, D. M. (2005). Recreation, tourism, and rural well-being (No. 7). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
31. Riediker, M. & Koren, H. S. (2004). The importance of environmental exposures to physical, mental and social well-being. International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 207(3), 193-201.
32. Roe, P., Hrymak, V. & Dimanche, F. (2014). Assessing environmental sustainability in tourism and recreation areas: a risk-assessment-based model. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 22(2), 319-338.
33. Rosenthal, D. H., Loomis, J. B. & Peterson, G. L. (1984). Pricing for efficiency and revenue in public recreation areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 16(3), 195-208.
34. Shafer, C. S., Lee, B. K. & Turner, S. (2000). A tale of three greenway trails: user perceptions related to quality of life. Landscape and urban planning, 49(3-4), 163-178.
35. Sharma, R. & Malaviya, P. (2021). Management of stormwater pollution using green infrastructure: The role of rain gardens. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 8(2), e1507.
36. Stein, T. V., Denny, C. B. & Pennisi, L. A. (2003). Using visitors' motivations to provide learning opportunities at water-based recreation areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 11(5), 404-425.
37. Thomsen, J. M., Powell, R. B. & Monz, C. (2018). A systematic review of the physical and mental health benefits of wildland recreation. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 36(1).
38. Tinsworth, D. K. (2001). Special study: Injuries and deaths associated with children's playground equipment. US Consumer Product Safety Commission.
39. Vaezi Nejad, S., Ghelichipour, Z. & Armin, M. (2023). Designing recreational trails in Sarigol National Park and Protected Area, Iran. ECOPERSIA, 11(3), 197-214.
40. Veltri, F. R., Miller, J. & Scott, D. K. (2001). An examination of security in campus recreation centers. Recreational Sports Journal, 25(2), 48-56.
41. Wesely, J. K. & Gaarder, E. (2004). The gendered “nature” of the urban outdoors: Women negotiating fear of violence. Gender & Society, 18(5), 645-663.