Ön Çalışma: Bougainville Tok Pisin Dilinde DASS-21 ve Disfonksiyon Ölçeği (DS) İçin Çeviri, Kültürel Uyum ve Geçerlilik Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışma, Depresyon, Anksiyete ve Stres Ölçeği’nin (DASS-21) ve Disfonksiyon Ölçeği’nin (DS) Bougainville Tok Pisin (TP) dilindeki güvenilirlik ve geçerliliğini değerlendirmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma sürecinde çeviri, geri çeviri, uzman değerlendirmesi, öğrencilerle pilot uygulama (N = 77) ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) adımları izlenmiştir. DASS-21’in stres alt boyutu DFA sonuçlarında yeterli güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik göstermediğinden analiz dışı bırakılmış ve bu alan için DASS-14 modelinin kullanılması önerilmiştir. İki faktörlü Depresyon-Anksiyete Ölçeği (DAS-14) modeli ve tek faktörlü DS modeli güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik açısından tatmin edici bulunmuştur. Anksiyete, depresyon ve disfonksiyon için Cronbach Alfa (α) katsayıları sırasıyla ,74, ,82 ve ,73; DAS-14 için McDonald Omega (ω) değerleri anksiyete için ,74 ve depresyon için ,81 olarak belirlenmiştir. DS için McDonald’s Omega değeri ,72’dir. DAS-14 modeli için uyum indeksleri CFI = 0,90, TLI = 0,88, SMRs = 0,08, RMSEA = 0,07 ve RMR = 0,06 olarak bulunmuş ve modelin makul uyum gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. DS modeli için ise TLI = 0,91, CFI = 0,94, SMRs = 0,06, RMR = 0,09 ve RMSEA = 0,07 değerleri elde edilmiş ve bu da iyi bir uyuma işaret etmektedir. Yakınsak ve ayrışan geçerlilik analizleri, DAS-14 (TP) ve DS ölçeklerinin geçerliliğini desteklemiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• DASS-21
• Dysfunction Scale (DS)
• CFA
• Tok Pisin
• Bougainville

Preliminary Study on Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of DASS-21 and Dysfunctional Scale (DS) in Tok Pisin Language of Bougainville

Abstract

This study assessed reliability and validity of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Dysfunction Scale (DS) in the Tok Pisin (TP) language of Bougainville. The process followed translation, back translation, expert review, pilot testing with students (N = 77), and conducting CFA. The sub-scale for Stress of DASS-21 did not show reliability and validity in the CFA and was omitted for the analysis for the stress domain, a DASS-14 is suggested. The two-factor measurement model of the Depression Anxiety Scale (DAS-14) and a single-factor model for DS have demonstrated reliability and validity. Cronbach’s Alpha (α) for anxiety, depression, and dysfunction were .74, .82, and .73 respectively. McDonald’s Omega (ω) reliability score for anxiety and depression components of DAS-14 were .74 and .81 respectively. For DS, McDonald’s Omega (ω) reliability score was .72. For DAS-14, model fit indices for CFI = 0.90, TLI = 0.88, SMRs = 0.08, RMSEA = 0.07, and RMR = 0.06 indicating reasonable fit. For DS model fit indices were TLI = 0.91, and CFI = 0.94, and values of SMRs =0.06, RMR = 0.09, and RMSEA = 0.07 were measured which indicated a good fit. Convergent and discriminant validity scores showed appropriate to validate DAS-14 (TP) and DS

Keywords

• DASS-21
• Dysfunction Scale (DS)
• CFA
• Tok Pisin
• Bougainville

Kaynakça

1. Abrar, M., & Sidik, E. J. (2019). Analyzing ethical considerations and research methods in children research. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(2), 184-193. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i2.6516
2. Adhikari, Y. (2020a). A comparative study of the professional quality of life factors in Nepali MHPSS practitioners. Advanced Research in Psychology, 1(1). https://www.aap-akademie.at/mt-content/uploads/2021/12/arep_2020_1_1_131921.pdf
3. Adhikari, Y. (2020b). Prevalence of professional quality of life (ProQOL) and its influence on the personal distress of doctors in Nepal [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nicosia]. https://repository.unic.ac.cy/archive/item/2372?lang=en
4. Andersen, I., Poudyal, B., Abeypala, A., Uriarte, C., & Rossi, R. (2020). Mental health and psychosocial support for families of missing persons in Sri Lanka: A retrospective cohort study. Conflict and Health, 14(1), Article 16(2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-020-00266-0
5. Arafat, S. Y., Chowdhury, H. R., Qusar, M. M. A. S., & Hafez, M. A. (2016). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of research instruments: A methodological review. Journal of Behavioral Health, 5(3), 129-136. https://www.periodicos.capes.gov.br/index.php/acervo/buscador.html?task=detalhes&id=W2461994724
6. Awang, P. (2015). SEM made simple: A gentle approach to learning Structural Equation Modeling. MPWS Rich Publication.
7. Cha, E. S., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A. (2007). Translation of scales in cross‐cultural research: Issues and techniques. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58(4), 386-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x
8. Ertz, M., Karakas, F., & Sarigöllü, E. (2016). Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3971–3980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.010

9. Fine, S. L., Augustinavicius, J. L., Barnabas, E., Poli, M. K., Tierney, D., & Bolton, P. (2024). Perceptions of mental health and psychosocial problems among conflict-affected adults in North Bougainville: Results of a rapid qualitative assessment. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909241249593
10. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
11. Hatem, G., Zeidan, J., Goossens, M., & Moreira, C. (2022). Normality testing methods and the importance of skewness and kurtosis in statistical analysis. BAU Journal -Science and Technology, 3(2), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.54729/KTPE9512
12. Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(2), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X29657
13. International Business Machines. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 24) [Computer software]. NY-IBM Corp.
14. International Business Machines. (2017). IBM SPSS Amos 25 for Windows (version 25) [Computer software]. NY-IBM Corp.
15. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2013). Accompanying the families of missing persons: A practical handbook. https://www.icrc.org/en/publication/4110-accompanying-families-missing-persons-practical-handbook
16. International Federation Red Cross and Red Crescent. (2021). IFRC child safeguarding policy: Ethical evaluations and research involving children background. https://www.ifrc.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/Guidelines-for-Ethical-Evaluations-and-Research-with-Children.pdf
17. International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf
18. Kohrt, B. A., & Kaiser, B. N. (2021). Measuring mental health in humanitarian crises: a practitioner’s guide to validity. Conflict and Health, 15, Article 72 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00408-y
19. Le, M. T. H., Tran, T. D., Holton, S., Nguyen, H. T., Wolfe, R., & Fisher, J. (2017). Reliability, convergent validity and factor structure of the DASS-21 in a sample of Vietnamese adolescents. PloS one, 12(7), Article e0180557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180557
20. Lee, B., & Kim, Y. E. (2022). Validity of the depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS-21) in a sample of Korean university students. Current Psychology, 41(6), 3937-3946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00914-x
21. Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u
22. Mcdonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Naumova, K. (2022). Dimensionality and reliability of the depression anxiety stress scales 21 among adolescents in North Macedonia. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1007594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1007594
24. Oei, T. P., Sawang, S., Goh, Y. W., & Mukhtar, F. (2013). Using the depression anxiety stress scale 21 (DASS‐21) across cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 1018-1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.755535
25. Poudyal, B., Bass, J., Subyantoro, T., Jonathan, A., Erni, T., & Bolton, P. (2009). Assessment of the psychosocial and mental health needs, dysfunction and coping mechanisms of violence affected populations in Bireuen Aceh. Torture, 19(3), 218-226.
26. Tierney, D., Bolton, P., Matanu, B., Garasu, L., Barnabas, E., & Silove, D. (2016). The mental health and psychosocial impact of the Bougainville Crisis: a synthesis of available information. International Journal Of Mental Health Systems, 10, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-016-0054-x
27. Tsegaye, B. S., Asemu, M. M., & Hailu, H. B. (2023). Construct validity and reliability of Amharic version of DASS-21 scale among Ethiopian Defense University College Of Health Science Students. BMC Health Serv Res, 24, Article 914 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11267-7
28. University of New South Wales. (2023). Overview of the DASS and its uses. www2.Psy.unsw.edu.au. https://www2.psy.unsw.edu.au/dass/over.htm
29. Van Ommeren, M., Sharma, B., Thapa, S., Makaju, R., Prasain, D., Bhattarai, R., & de Jong, J. (1999). Preparing instruments for transcultural research: use of the translation monitoring form with Nepali-speaking Bhutanese refugees. Transcultural Psychiatry, 36(3), 285-301. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/136346159903600304
30. Wittayapun, Y., Summart, U., Polpanadham, P., Direksunthorn, T., Paokanha, R., Judabood, N., & A’la, M. Z. (2023). Validation of depression, anxiety, and stress scales (DASS-21) among Thai nursing students in an online learning environment during the COVID-19 outbreak: A multi-center study. Plos one, 18(6), e0288041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288041