“Benimle İletişim Kurabilir misin?” Türk Romantik Partnerler Arasında Partner Phubbing ve İlişki Memnuniyeti

Öz

Bu çalışma, Partner Phubbing Ölçeği’nin Türk örneklemine uyarlanması ve partner phubbing davranışının romantik ilişkilerde ilişki memnuniyetiyle ilişkisinin incelenmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemini toplam 350 kişi oluşturmuştur. Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi sonucunda, ölçeğin tek faktörlü ve 9 maddelik yapısının Türk örnekleminde doğrulandığı belirlenmiştir. Standartlaştırılmış madde faktör yüklerinin ,24 ile ,87 arasında değiştiği ve tüm yüklerin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu saptanmıştır. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılık katsayısı Cronbach alfa için ,85, McDonald omega için ise ,86 olarak bulunmuştur. Bu bulgular, ölçeğin yeterli düzeyde güvenilir olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, kadınların erkeklere kıyasla partnerlerinden daha yüksek düzeyde partner phubbing algıladıkları belirlenmiştir. Algılanan partner phubbing düzeyi ile özdenetim ve ilişki memnuniyeti arasında negatif yönde anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular, partner phubbing davranışının romantik ilişkilerde etkileşimi ve ilişki memnuniyetini olumsuz etkileyebileceğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Partner phubbing
• ilişki memnuniyeti
• güvenilirlik
• geçerlilik

Etik Beyan

Araştırma Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu’ndan 27/04/2022 tarih ve E-95674917-108.99-92913 sayılı yasal izni ile yürütülmüştür.

“Can You Communicate with Me?” Partner Phubbing and Relationship Satisfaction Among Turkish Romantic Partners

Öz

This study was conducted to adapt the Partner Phubbing Scale into Turkish and to examine the relationship between partner phubbing behavior and relationship satisfaction in romantic relationships. The sample of the study consisted of a total of 350 participants. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, it was determined that the single-factor structure with 9 items of the scale was confirmed in the Turkish sample. The standardized item factor loadings ranged from .24 to .87, and all loadings were found to be statistically significant. The internal consistency coefficients were calculated as 0.85 for Cronbach’s alpha and 0.86 for McDonald’s omega. These findings indicate that the scale has an adequate level of reliability. In addition, it was found that women perceived higher levels of partner phubbing from their partners compared to men. A significant negative relationship was found between perceived partner phubbing and both self-control and relationship satisfaction. The findings suggest that partner phubbing may negatively affect interactions and relationship satisfaction in romantic relationships.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Partner phubbing
• relationship satisfaction
• reliability
• validity

Etik Beyan

The research was conducted with legal permission from the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Gümüşhane University, dated 27/04/2022 and numbered E-95674917-108.99-92913.

Kaynakça

1. Abramova, O., Baumann, A., Krasnova, H., & Lessmann, S. (2017). To Phub or not to phub: Understanding off-task smartphone usage and its consequences in the academic environment (No. 87717). Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
2. Água, J., Coelho, C., Lourenço, M. G., Patrão, I., & Leal, I. (2019). Partner phubbing (Pphubbing): Validação Portuguesa. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 20(1), 234-241. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/28839
3. Ahlstrom, M., Lundberg, N. R., Zabriskie, R., Eggett, D., & Lindsay, G. B. (2012). Me, my spouse, and my avatar: The relationship between marital satisfaction and playing massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Journal of Leisure Research, 44(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2012.11950252
4. Atalay, G. E., Tanrıverdi, Y., & Arıcı, Y. (2024). Social media use in romantic relationships: A qualitative research. New Media, (16), 98-121. https://doi.org/10.55609/yenimedya.1428821
5. Bayram, N. (2013). Introduction to structural equation modeling & Amos. Ezgi Publishing.
6. Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
8. Bitar, Z., Akel, M., Salameh, P., Obeid, S., & Hallit, S. (2023). Phubbing among Lebanese young adults: Scale validation and association with mental health (depression, anxiety, and stress). Current Psychology, 42, 19709-19720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03104-z

9. Bozgüney, R. (2026). Digital recreation and youth mental health: The relationship between problematic smartphone use, social media, and well-being. Journal of Accessible Education & Recreation, 1(1), 61-67. https://www.accessiblejournal.com/index.php/pub/article/download/9/7
10. Bröning, S. & Wartberg, L. (2022). Attached to your smartphone? A dyadic perspective on perceived partner phubbing and attachment in long-term couple relationships, Computers in Human Behavior, 126, e 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106996
11. Chen, C., Zhang, K. Z. K., Gong, X., Zhao, S. J., Lee, M. K. O., & Liang, L. (2017). Examining the effects of motives and gender differences on smartphone addiction. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 891-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.002
12. Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effect of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 304-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12506
13. Coyne, S. M., Busby, D., Bushman, B. J., Gentile, G. A., Ridge, R., & Stockdale, L. (2012). Gaming in the game of love: Effects of video games on conflict in couples. Family Relations, 61(July), Article 388e396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00712.x
14. Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Fraser, A. M., Fellows, K., & Day, R. D. (2014). “Media time = Family time”: Positive media use in families with adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 29(5), 663-688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558414538316
15. Curun, F. (2001). The effects of sexism and sex role orientation on romantic relationship satisfaction [Master thesis, Middle East Technical University]. OpenMETU. https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/12102
16. Çizmeci, E. (2017). Disconnected, though satisfied: Pphubbıng behavior and relationship satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 17(2), 364-375.
17. Dupre, M. E., Beck, A. N., & Meadows, S. O. (2009). Marital trajectories and mortality among US adults. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170(5), 546-555. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp194
18. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4. Ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
19. Gypsy, M. D., & Gerard, J. K. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the assessment for living and learning scale: A cross-validation investigation. Measurement and Evoluation in Counseling and Development, 35(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069044
20. Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting's consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051
21. Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., Carlson, J. R., & Carlson, D. S. (2015). Resource loss from technology overload and its impact on work-family conflict: Can leaders help? Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.023
22. Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
23. Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). The Relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers and Education, 59, 505-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023
24. Kadylak, T., Makki, T. W., Francis, J., Cotton, S. R., Rikard, R. V., & Sah, Y. J. (2018). Disrupted copresence: Older adults’ views on mobile phone use during face-to-face interactions. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(3),331-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918758129
25. Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., Çulha, İ., & Babadağ, B. (2016). The virtual world’s current addiction: Phubbing. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 3(2), 250-269. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0013
26. Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I., & Baumann, A. (2016, June 12–15). Why phubbing is toxic for your relationship: Understanding the role of smartphone jealousy among ‘Generation Y’ users (Conference presentation). Twenty Fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Istanbul, Turkey.
27. Latifa, R. Mumtaz, E.F., & Subchi, I. (2019, November 6-8). Psychological explanation of phubbing behavior: Smartphone addiction, emphaty and self-control [Conference presentation]. 7th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Jakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM47753.2019.8965376
28. Leggett, C., & Rossouw, P. J. (2014). The impact of technology use on couple relationships: A neuropsychology perspective. International Journal of Neuropsychotherapy, 2(1), 44-99.
29. Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014, February 11). Couples, the internet, and social media. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/
30. Liu, Q. Q., Zhang, D. J., Yang, X. J., Zhang, C. Y., Fan, C. Y., Zhou, Z., & Zhou, Z. K. (2018). Perceived stress and mobile phone addiction in Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.006
31. Luo, S., & Tuney, S. (2015). Can texting be used to improve romantic relationships? The effects of sending positive text messages on relationship satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, Article 670e678 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.035
32. McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women's personal and relational wellbeing. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065
33. McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2018). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 89(1), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12822
34. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
35. Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2017). A politeness theory analysis of cell-phone usage in the presence of friends. Communication Studies, 68(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2017.1299024
36. Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2014). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514539755
37. Nazir, T., & Pişkin, M. (2016). Phubbing: A Technological invasion which connected the world but disconnected humans. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.25215/0304.195
38. Nebioğlu, M., Konuk, N., Akbaba, S., & Eroğlu, Y. (2021). The investigation of validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Brief Self-Control Scale. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 22(4), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.5455/bcp.20120911042732
39. Odaci, H., Erzen, E., & Yeniçeri, I. (2024). Predictors of phubbing: Interpersonal relationships and family relationships. Trends in Psychology. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-024-00361-8
40. Ozdemir, Y., Kuzucu, Y., & Ak, Ş. (2014). Depression, loneliness and internet addiction: How important is low self-control? Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.009
41. Parmaksız, İ. (2020). Phubbing in communication and relationships. The Turkish Journal of Social Research, 24(2), 359-372. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/736008
42. Parmaksız, İ. (2021). Predictive effect of phubbing and life satisfaction on depression symptoms in adults. Journal of Dependence, 22(3), 236-247. https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.888038
43. Prooijen, D. L. V., Hutteman, R., Mulder, H., Aken, M. A. G. V., & Laceulle, O. M. (2018). Self-control, parenting, and problem behavior in early childhood: A multi-method, multi-informant study. Infant Behavior and Development, 50(28), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.11.001
44. Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540751245382
45. Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ Views on Mobile Etiquette. Washington DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette
46. Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
47. Roberts, J. A., & Pirog III, S. F. (2013). A preliminary investigation of materialism and impulsiveness as predictors of technological addictions among young adults. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.1.2012.011
48. Roberts, J. A., Petnji Yaya, L. H., & Manolis, C. (2014). The invisible addiction: cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(4), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.3.2014.015
49. Schade, L. C., Sandberg, J., Bean, R., Busby, D., & Coyne, S. (2013). Using technology to connect in romantic relationships: Effects on attachment, relationship satisfaction, and stability in emerging adults. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 12(4), 314-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2013.836051
50. South, S. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). Marital satisfaction and physical health: Evidence for an orchid effect. Psychological Science, 24(3), 373-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612453116
51. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. L. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press.
52. Şen Montazerirad, B., & Bek, H. (2026). Phubbing among university students: A qualitative study on using smartphones and social media applications. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 25(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.1737738
53. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, lespathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
54. Teixeira, I. N., & Freire, S. E. A. (2020). Partner Phubbing Scale: Evidências de validade e precisão. Summa Psicológica UST, 17(1), 42-48.
55. Tekkam, S. D., Bala, S., & Pandve, H. (2020). Consequence of phubbing on psychological distress among the youth of Hyderabad. Medical Journal of Dr. DY Patil Vidyapeeth, 13(6), 642-647.
56. Tiryaki Göksu, Y., Çetinkaya, B., & Yam, F. C. (2025). Relationship between partner phubbing and self-disclosure in romantic relationships: The mediating role of perceived romantic relationship. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Journal of ISS, 15(2), 1037-1050. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1615183
57. Turkish Informatics Industry Association (TÜBİSAD). (n.d.). According to the Deloitte Global Mobile Consumer Survey; we try to reduce smartphone use, but we check our phones on average every 13 minutes. Retrieved March 28, 2026, from https://www.tubisad.org.tr/tr/guncel/detay/Deloitte-Global-Mobil-Kullanici-Arastirmasina-gore-Akilli-telefon-kullanimini-azaltmaya-calisiyoru/33/668/0
58. Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). (2025a). Proportion of individuals who used a mobile phone within the last three months by gender, 2018–2025. Retrieved March 28, 2026, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/api/tr/data/downloads? t=i&p=Ceml34QkNmxCyS4pjqeM8tZmYfS568goKMUsS0Ttr22HjABKYI3SElcYCMzJ9nqQw1FflAuatA3ke5yNKiMpNU7waX2Jw7RzA4UdOyf57OZKxxuLZVnlogC3HLWM3ncMBivpxxKyC9A24LD8NVdsIQ%3D%3D Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat) (2025b). Divorce. Retrieved March 28, 2026, from https://nip.tuik.gov.tr/?value=Bosanma
59. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic books. Vanden Abeele, M. M. P. (2020). The social consequences of phubbing: A framework and a research agenda. In R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S. S. Lim, & Y. Li (Eds.), The oxford handbook of mobile communication and society (pp. 157–174). Oxford University Press.
60. Volkmer, S. A., & Lermer, E. (2019). Unhappy and addicted to your phone? – Higher mobile phone use is associated with lower well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 210-218.
61. Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.014
62. Yam, F.C. (2021, February 22-25). Investigation on the perceived partner phubbing levels of individuals in terms of some variables [Conference presentation]. International Symposium of Scientific Research and Innovative Studies, Bandırma, Türkiye.
63. Yam, F.C. & Kumcağız, H. (2020). Adaptation of general phubbing scale to Turkish culture and investigation of phubbing levels of university students in terms of various variables. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 7,48-60. doi:10.5152/addicta.2020.19061