Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Enterococcus isolates in a five year period at a tertiary care hospital
Abstract
Aim: Enterococci are present as a part of the normal gut flora which can cause many community- and hospital-acquired infections. It is essential to determine the antibiotic resistance profile in treatment of Enterococcus spp. In this study we aimed to determine the sub-species of Enterococcus spp and their antibiotic resistance profiles isolated from a tertiary hospital in a five-year period.
Methods: The antibiotic resistance profiles of 2995 Enterococcus spp isolated from various clinical specimens of patients between January 2014 and December 2018 were reviewed in this retrospective cohort study.
Results: Ampicillin resistance was very low (5.6%) in E. faecalis, but it was very high in E. faecium (91.8%). High level gentamycin, high level streptomycin and levofloxacin resistances were very high in all Enterococcus species and especially in E. faecium. Linezolid, tigecycline or daptomycin resistance was not determined in any Enterococcus isolates. Nitrofurantoin resistance (61.9%) and parenteral penicillin resistance (82.4%) were also very high in E. faecium isolates. Teicoplanin resistance was very low in E.faecalis (1.5%) isolates but approximately half (44.9%) of the E. faecium isolates were resistant to Teicoplanin. Vancomycin resistance was determined in 1.5% of E.faecalis isolates and in 45.5% of E. faecium isolates.
Conclusion: In conclusion, we determined high resistance rates to many antibiotics in both E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates. Tigecyclin, linezolid and daptomycin resistance was not determined in any Enteroccus isolates. Vancomycin resistance was determined in 1.5% of E. faecalis isolates and in 45.5% of E. faecium isolates. This high rate of vancomycin resistance should be taken into account and studies should be conducted to eliminate this resistance.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- 1. Sood S, Malhotra M, Das BK, Kapil A. Enterococcal infections antimicrobial resistance. Indian J Med Res. 2008;128(2):111-21.
- 2. Cheah ALY, Spelman T, Liew D. Peel T, Howden BP, D. Spelman, et al. Enterococcal bacteraemia: Factors influencing mortality, length of stay and costs of hospitalization Clin Microbiol Infect Year: 2013;19(4):E181-9.
- 3. Bayjanov JR, Baan J, Rogers MRC, Troelstra A, Willems RJL, van Schaik W. Enterococcus faecium genome dynamics during long-term asymptomatic patient gut colonization. Microb Genom. 2019;5(7): e000277.
- 4. Arias CA, Contreras GA, Murray BE. Management of multidrug-resistant enterococcal infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(6):555-62.
- 5. Kang ZZ, Lei CW, Kong LH, Wang YL, Ye XL, Ma BH, at al. Detection of transferable oxazolidinone resistance determinants in enterococcus faecalis and enterococcus faecium of swine origin in Sichuan Province, China. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019;25: doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.05.021.
- 6. EUCAST. EUCAST Clinical Breakpoint Table Version 6.0, Valid From 2016-01-01. Basel: EUCAST, 2016. http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/.
- 7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-fourth informational supplement update. CLSI document M100-S24. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA (2014).
- 8. Karna A, Baral R, Khanal B. Characterization of clinical isolates of enterococci with special reference to glycopeptide susceptibility at a tertiary care center of Eastern Nepal. Int J Microbiol. 2019;7936156.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Eylül 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi
29 Ağustos 2019
Kabul Tarihi
5 Eylül 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2019 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 9