Increased post-voiding residue and recurrent acute epididymitis: Are they causally related?
Abstract
Aim: It is known that recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) is associated with increased post-voiding residue (PVR), however, the same relationship is yet to be shown in adults for recurrent acute epididymitis. To the best of our knowledge, there are inadequate studies on this subject and they are mainly focused on the retrograde flow of the infected urine into the ejaculatory duct in terms of pathophysiology. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the causal relationship between recurrent acute epididymitis and increased post-voiding residue.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the data of 388 patients who received treatment for epididymitis in our polyclinic between 2015 and 2018 were evaluated to determine that 72 were examined for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Age, PSA level, Qmax value, uroflowmetric pattern, post-voiding residual volume, International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), and prostate volumes were recorded. Patients were divided into acute (n=38, Group 1) and recurrent acute (n=34, Group 2) epididymitis groups for analysis. The patients in Group 2 were treated for epididymitis at least two times in the last six months or thrice a year. The patients in Group 1 were treated only once in a year. Chi-square (Fisher’s exact test) and Student’s t-test were used to compare categorical variables. A value of P<0.05 was considered the threshold of statistical significance.
Results: Age, PSA level, prostate volume, IPSS score, and peak flow did not significantly differ between the two groups. However, there were significant differences in terms of post-voiding residual urine volumes (P=0.029). The mean post-voiding residual volumes in patients with acute and recurrent acute epididymitis were 47.3 (16.2) ml and 178.2 (23.6) ml, respectively.
Conclusion: There is a relationship between increased post-voiding residual urine volume and recurrent acute epididymitis. Patients who present with recurrent acute epididymitis should be scanned for urological pathologies which may cause increased PVR.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- 1. Cek M, Sturdza L, Pilatz A. Acute and chronic epididymitis. Eur Urol Suppl. 2017;16:124–31.
- 2. Tracy CR, Steers WD, Costabile R. Diagnosis and management of epididymitis. Urol Clin North Am. 2008;35:101–8.
- 3. Trojian TH, Lishnak TS, Heiman D. Epididymitis and orchitis: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2009;79:583–7.
- 4. Harnisch JP, Berger RE, Alexander ER, Monda G, Holmes KK. Aetiology of acute epididymitis. Lancet. 1977 Apr 16;1(8016):819-21.
- 5. Street E, Joyce A, Wilson J. Clinical Effectiveness Group, British Association for Sexual Health and HIV. BASHH UK guideline for the management of epididymo-orchitis. 2010. Int J STD AIDS. 2011 Jul;22(7):361-5.
- 6. Nicholson A, Rait G, Murray-Thomas T, Hughes G, Mercer CH, Cassell J. Management of epididymo-orchitis in primary care results from a large UK primary care database. Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Oct;60(579):e407-22.
- 7. Weingartner K, Gerharz EW, Gillich M, Riedmiller H. Ectopic third ureter causing recurrent acute epididymitis. Br J Urol. 1998;81:164-5.
- 8. Siegel A, Snyder H, Duckett JW. Epididymitis in infants and boys: Underlying urogenital anomalies and efficacy of imaging modalities. J Urol. 1987;138:1100-3.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Üroloji , Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
2 Ocak 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi
10 Ocak 2020
Kabul Tarihi
17 Ocak 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2020 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1