Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluation of spinal instrumentation following organ transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 5 1 Mayıs 2020
PDF İndir
EN TR

Evaluation of spinal instrumentation following organ transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Aim: Improvements in transplantation medicine and surgery, anesthesiology, and postoperative care paved the way for successful procedures for transplant patients. The aim of the present study is to describe the results of surgical correction for spinal deformities in patients who underwent several types of organ transplantation.
Methods: The study group consisted of ten patients with a history of organ transplantation who require spinal surgery with different etiologies. Seven (70%), two (20%) and one (10%) patient had lung, liver, and lung transplantations, respectively. The etiology for spinal surgery was spinal stenosis in six (60%), vertebra fracture in three (30%), and vertebral metastasis in one (10%) patient. Pre- intra- and postoperative radiological, clinical, and functional outcomes were noted.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 57.1 (8.9) years, ranging between 38-62 years. Six of the patients were male, and four were female. Surgery time following the transplant surgery was 15.6 (2.1) months. The blood requirement in the operating room was 5.6 (0.8) units of erythrocyte suspension. Hospital length of stay was 8.5 (5.6) days following the spinal instrumentation surgery. Two patients had mild complications in the postoperative period. The preoperative VAS score significantly decreased from 6.4 (0.8) to 3.1 (1.6) after the surgery (P<0.001).
Conclusions: Posterior spinal instrumentation on transplanted patients can be an effective treatment which improves the life quality of the patients. A multidisciplinary approach with an experienced team is highly required.

Keywords

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Proje Numarası

Yok

Teşekkür

Yok

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Black CK, Termanini KM, Aguirre O, Hawksworth JS, Sosin M. Solid organ transplantation in the 21st century. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Oct;6(20):409.
  2. 2. Ertuğrul G, Yanaral T. Living donor liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center experiences. J Surg Med. 2019;3(4):320-3.
  3. 3. Lipton A, Uzzo R, Amato RJ, Ellis GK, Hakimian B, Roodman GD, et al. The science and practice of bone health in oncology: managing bone loss and metastasis in patients with solid tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009 Oct;7(Suppl 7):S1-29; quiz S30. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2009.0080.
  4. 4. Shaikh KA, Helbig GM, Shapiro SA, Shah MV, Khairi SA, Horn EM. Spinal surgery following organ transplantation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jun;14(6):779-84. doi: 10.3171/2011.2.SPINE10481.
  5. 5. Nickel BT, Ledford CK, Watters TS, Wellman SS, Bolognesi MP. Arthroplasty in organ transplant patients. Arthroplast Today. 2015 Jun 19;1(2):41-4. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2015.04.002.
  6. 6. Duplantier NL, Rivere AE, Cohen AJ, Chimento GF. Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes After Abdominal Organ Transplantation. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2018;27(2):119-24.
  7. 7. Nowicki P, Chaudhary H. Total hip replacement in renal transplant patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Dec;89(12):1561-6.
  8. 8. Massoudi N, Safari F, Mottaghi K. Spinal Anesthesia for Renal Transplantation in Lung Resected Patient: A Case Report. Tanaffos. 2018 Mar;17(3):207-10.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ortopedi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Mayıs 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Nisan 2020

Kabul Tarihi

8 Mayıs 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 5

Kaynak Göster

APA
Mert, M., & Ermutlu, C. (2020). Evaluation of spinal instrumentation following organ transplantation: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 4(5), 327-330. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.730276
AMA
1.Mert M, Ermutlu C. Evaluation of spinal instrumentation following organ transplantation: A retrospective cohort study. J Surg Med. 2020;4(5):327-330. doi:10.28982/josam.730276
Chicago
Mert, Murat, ve Cenk Ermutlu. 2020. “Evaluation of spinal instrumentation following organ transplantation: A retrospective cohort study”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4 (5): 327-30. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.730276.
EndNote
Mert M, Ermutlu C (01 Mayıs 2020) Evaluation of spinal instrumentation following organ transplantation: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4 5 327–330.
IEEE
[1]M. Mert ve C. Ermutlu, “Evaluation of spinal instrumentation following organ transplantation: A retrospective cohort study”, J Surg Med, c. 4, sy 5, ss. 327–330, May. 2020, doi: 10.28982/josam.730276.
ISNAD
Mert, Murat - Ermutlu, Cenk. “Evaluation of spinal instrumentation following organ transplantation: A retrospective cohort study”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4/5 (01 Mayıs 2020): 327-330. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.730276.
JAMA
1.Mert M, Ermutlu C. Evaluation of spinal instrumentation following organ transplantation: A retrospective cohort study. J Surg Med. 2020;4:327–330.
MLA
Mert, Murat, ve Cenk Ermutlu. “Evaluation of spinal instrumentation following organ transplantation: A retrospective cohort study”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, c. 4, sy 5, Mayıs 2020, ss. 327-30, doi:10.28982/josam.730276.
Vancouver
1.Murat Mert, Cenk Ermutlu. Evaluation of spinal instrumentation following organ transplantation: A retrospective cohort study. J Surg Med. 01 Mayıs 2020;4(5):327-30. doi:10.28982/josam.730276