Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients from different age groups with antral gastritis

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3 1 Mart 2021
PDF İndir
EN

Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients from different age groups with antral gastritis

Öz

Background/Aim: Gastric carcinoma (GC) is the fourth most common cancer worldwide and the second most common cause of cancer death. Primary prevention for GC includes healthy diet, eradication of Helicobacter pylori (HP), chemoprevention and early diagnosis. For this reason, finding out the HP incidence in patients with suspected antral gastritis in various age groups can lead to forming a treatment strategy to prevent development of GC. The aim of this study is to find out the HP incidence in patients with a proven antral gastritis diagnosis in various age groups and form different treatment strategies. Methods: This study included 1589 patients aged between 15-91 years who underwent diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy due to complaints of dyspepsia. The demographic characteristics, such as age and sex, and histopathological HP score (HPS) and IM score (IMS) were recorded. The patients were divided into three groups according to age: 15-29 years, 30-64 years, and 65 years and above. Results: In the 15–29-year age group, IM positivity was significantly lower and HP positivity was significantly higher compared to other age groups (P<0.01). In the age group of 65 years and above, HP positivity was significantly lower than in the other groups (P<0.01). The incidence of IM was significantly higher and that of HP was significantly lower in male patients aged 65 years and older (P<0.01 for both). IM positivity was significantly higher in HP negative patients than in HP positive patients (P=0.02). Conclusion: The most important risk factors for the development of IM are male gender and being aged 65 years and older. HP positivity is higher among the young population and IM prevalence is higher in advanced ages. There is no correlation between HP positivity and the presence of IM.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Sitarz R, Skierucha M, Mielko J, Offerhaus GJA, Maciejewski R, Polkowski WP. Gastric cancer: epidemiology, prevention, classification, and treatment. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:239–48.
  2. 2. Kesici U. Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori scores in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cukurova Med J. 2018;43:574-80.
  3. 3. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, 7–14 June 1994. Schistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1994;61:1–241.
  4. 4. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O'Morain C, Bazzoli F, El-Omar E, Graham D, et al. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pyloriinfection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report. Gut. 2007;56:772–81.
  5. 5. Sugimoto M, Ban H, Ichikawa H, Sahara S, Otsuka T, Inatomi O, et al. Efficacy of the Kyoto classification of gastritis in identifying patients at high risk for gastric cancer. Intern Med. 2017;56:579-86.
  6. 6. Özer Etik D, Turhan N. Gastrik intestinal metaplaziye gastroenterolog ve patolog gözü ile bakış. Güncel Gastroenteroloji. 2016;20:375-82.
  7. 7. Yoon H, Kim N. Diagnosis and management of the high risk group for gastric cancer. Gut Liver. 2015;9:5-17.
  8. 8. Büyükbayram H, Uzunlar AK, Yılmaz F, Yaldız M, Dursun M, Arslan A. Histological evaluation of gastric biopsies according to sydney system. Turkish Journal of Pathology. 2000:16;116-20.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Cerrahi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Mart 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

3 Haziran 2020

Kabul Tarihi

11 Nisan 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kesıcı, U., Öztürk, G., Kesici, S., & Yılmaz, A. (2021). Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients from different age groups with antral gastritis. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 5(3), 226-229. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.747328
AMA
1.Kesıcı U, Öztürk G, Kesici S, Yılmaz A. Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients from different age groups with antral gastritis. J Surg Med. 2021;5(3):226-229. doi:10.28982/josam.747328
Chicago
Kesıcı, Ugur, Gökmen Öztürk, Sevgi Kesici, ve Atilla Yılmaz. 2021. “Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients from different age groups with antral gastritis”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5 (3): 226-29. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.747328.
EndNote
Kesıcı U, Öztürk G, Kesici S, Yılmaz A (01 Mart 2021) Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients from different age groups with antral gastritis. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5 3 226–229.
IEEE
[1]U. Kesıcı, G. Öztürk, S. Kesici, ve A. Yılmaz, “Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients from different age groups with antral gastritis”, J Surg Med, c. 5, sy 3, ss. 226–229, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.28982/josam.747328.
ISNAD
Kesıcı, Ugur - Öztürk, Gökmen - Kesici, Sevgi - Yılmaz, Atilla. “Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients from different age groups with antral gastritis”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5/3 (01 Mart 2021): 226-229. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.747328.
JAMA
1.Kesıcı U, Öztürk G, Kesici S, Yılmaz A. Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients from different age groups with antral gastritis. J Surg Med. 2021;5:226–229.
MLA
Kesıcı, Ugur, vd. “Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients from different age groups with antral gastritis”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, c. 5, sy 3, Mart 2021, ss. 226-9, doi:10.28982/josam.747328.
Vancouver
1.Ugur Kesıcı, Gökmen Öztürk, Sevgi Kesici, Atilla Yılmaz. Comparison of intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori positivity in patients from different age groups with antral gastritis. J Surg Med. 01 Mart 2021;5(3):226-9. doi:10.28982/josam.747328