Assessment of quality and accuracy of YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic biopsy

Okan Gürkan; Canan Gunduz

doi:10.28982/josam.778941

Araştırma Makalesi

Transtorasik akciğer biyopsisi hakkındaki YouTube videolarının kalite ve doğruluğunun değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2020, , 627 - 630, 01.08.2020

Okan Gürkan , Canan Gunduz

https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.778941

Öz

Amaç: YouTube, hastalar için önemli bir tıbbi bilgi kaynağıdır. Ancak içerik kalitesine bağlı olarak yanıltıcı bilgiler de verebilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, perkütan transtorasik akciğer biyopsisi ile ilgili YouTube videolarının kalitesini değerlendirmektir.
Yöntemler: YouTube’da ‘Lung Biopsy’, ‘CT-Guided Lung Biopsy’ ‘US-Guided Lung Biopsy’ ve ‘percutaneous Transthoracic Biopsy’ terimleri ile arama yapıldı. İlintili İngilizce videolar iki kişi tarafından incelendi. Video karakteristikleri, yüklendiği kaynak ve içerik kalitesi değerlendirildi. Global kalite skorunu değerlendirmek için korelasyon analizi yapıldı.
Bulgular: On beş video (%47) profesyonel sağlık çalışanları, 9 video (%28) firmalar, 6 video (%19) kişisel hesaplar ve 2 (%6) video ise akademik kurum tarafından yüklenmişti. Videoların ortanca (IQR) kalite skoru 2 (aralık 1-5), ortanca uzunluğu ise 235 (46-751) saniye olarak hesaplandı. Videoların kalitesi, yüklendiği kaynağa göre değişiklik göstermekte olup, akademik kurumlar tarafından yüklenen videolar en yüksek kaliteye sahipti. Komplikasyonlar gibi önemli biyopsi prosedürü komponentleri, çoğu videoda değerlendirilmemişti.
Sonuç: Perkütan transtorasik akciğer biyopsisi (PTLB) ile ilgili YouTube videolarında bazı önemli noktalar göz ardı edildiğinden dolayı, düşük bir ortanca içerik kalite puanına sahip oldukları gözlendi. Bu nedenle, YouTube videoları yanıltıcı bir hasta bilgisi kaynağı olabilir. Akademik kurumlar ve sağlık uzmanları, bilgilendirici tıbbi bilgi arayan hastalar için doğru multimedya içeriği oluşturmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

YouTube, Sosyal medya, Biyopsi, Hasta eğitimi

Kaynakça

1. Alexa. 2019. The top 500 sites on the web. [Online] Available at: https://www.alexa.com/topsites. [Accessed 7 May 2019]
2. YouTube. 2019. YouTube for Press. [Online] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/intl/en-GB/yt/about/press/. [Accessed 7 May 2019]
3. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
4. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. International variation in lung cancer mortality rates and trends among women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:1025-36. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1220
5. Charig M, Clelland C, Gleeson F, R Miller, H Moss et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax. 2003;58:920-36. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.11.920
6. iProspect Search Engine User Behaviour Study. [Accessed January 26, 2012.] Available from: http://district4.extension.ifas.ufl.edu/Tech/TechPubs/WhitePaper_ 2006_SearchEngineUserBehavior.pdf.
7. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: An instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:105-11. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105
8. Lehmann S, Frank N. An Overview of Percutaneous CT-Guided Lung Biopsies. J Radiol Nurs 2018; 37: 2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2017.12.002
9. American T. Acr – Sir – Spr Practice Parameter on Informed Consent for Image-Guided Procedures. 2016;1076:1-8.
10. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39:899-903. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111114
11. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube. Spine. 2018;43:E1334-E1339. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691
12. Sechrest RC. The internet and the physician-patient relationship. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2566-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1440-3
13. Swischuk JL, Castaneda F, Patel JC, Jitendra C. Patel, Ruizong Li, et al. Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy of the Lung: Review of 612 Lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9:347-52. doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(98)70279-9.
14. Kazerooni EA, Lim FT, Mikhail A, Martinez FJ. Risk of pneumothorax in CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of the lung. Radiology. 1996;198:371-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596834
15. Jackson R, Schneider A, Baum N. Social media networking: YouTube and search engine optimization. J Med Pract Manage. 2011;26:254-7.

Assessment of quality and accuracy of YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic biopsy

Yıl 2020, , 627 - 630, 01.08.2020

Okan Gürkan , Canan Gunduz

https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.778941

Öz

Aim: YouTube is an essential source of medical information for patients, but may also be misleading, depending on the kind of content quality. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy.
Methods: A search on YouTube was performed with the terms ‘Lung Biopsy,’ ‘CT-Guided Lung Biopsy,’ ‘US-Guided Lung Biopsy,’ and ‘Percutaneous Transthoracic Biopsy.’ Relevant English videos were examined and scored by two reviewers. Video characteristics, uploaded sources, and content quality were assessed using different indices. Correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the possible correlation for global quality score.
Results: Fifteen videos (47%) were uploaded by a healthcare professional, nine videos (28%) by a product company, six videos (19%) by an individual user, and 2 (6%) by an academic institution. The videos had a median (IQR) quality score of 2 (range 1-5), and a median (IQR) length of 235 (46-751) seconds. The quality of the videos varied, depending on the uploaded sources as well as whether they were uploaded by academic institutions, which had the highest quality. Some important components regarding the biopsy procedure, such as complications, were not evaluated in most videos.
Conclusion: YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy (PTLB) had a low median content quality score, while some important points were grossly overlooked. Thus, YouTube videos may be a misleading source of patient information. Academic institutions and healthcare professionals should be creating accurate multimedia content for patients seeking informative medical information.

Anahtar Kelimeler

YouTube, Social Media, Biopsy, Patient Education

Kaynakça

1. Alexa. 2019. The top 500 sites on the web. [Online] Available at: https://www.alexa.com/topsites. [Accessed 7 May 2019]
2. YouTube. 2019. YouTube for Press. [Online] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/intl/en-GB/yt/about/press/. [Accessed 7 May 2019]
3. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
4. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. International variation in lung cancer mortality rates and trends among women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:1025-36. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1220
5. Charig M, Clelland C, Gleeson F, R Miller, H Moss et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax. 2003;58:920-36. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.11.920
6. iProspect Search Engine User Behaviour Study. [Accessed January 26, 2012.] Available from: http://district4.extension.ifas.ufl.edu/Tech/TechPubs/WhitePaper_ 2006_SearchEngineUserBehavior.pdf.
7. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: An instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:105-11. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105
8. Lehmann S, Frank N. An Overview of Percutaneous CT-Guided Lung Biopsies. J Radiol Nurs 2018; 37: 2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2017.12.002
9. American T. Acr – Sir – Spr Practice Parameter on Informed Consent for Image-Guided Procedures. 2016;1076:1-8.
10. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39:899-903. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111114
11. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube. Spine. 2018;43:E1334-E1339. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691
12. Sechrest RC. The internet and the physician-patient relationship. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2566-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1440-3
13. Swischuk JL, Castaneda F, Patel JC, Jitendra C. Patel, Ruizong Li, et al. Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy of the Lung: Review of 612 Lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9:347-52. doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(98)70279-9.
14. Kazerooni EA, Lim FT, Mikhail A, Martinez FJ. Risk of pneumothorax in CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of the lung. Radiology. 1996;198:371-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596834
15. Jackson R, Schneider A, Baum N. Social media networking: YouTube and search engine optimization. J Med Pract Manage. 2011;26:254-7.

Toplam 15 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	İngilizce
Konular	Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme
Bölüm	Araştırma makalesi
Yazarlar	Okan Gürkan 0000-0002-7934-9154 Canan Gunduz Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-4746-529X
Yayımlanma Tarihi	1 Ağustos 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2020

Kaynak Göster

APA	Gürkan, O., & Gunduz, C. (2020). Assessment of quality and accuracy of YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic biopsy. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 4(8), 627-630. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.778941
AMA	Gürkan O, Gunduz C. Assessment of quality and accuracy of YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic biopsy. J Surg Med. Ağustos 2020;4(8):627-630. doi:10.28982/josam.778941
Chicago	Gürkan, Okan, ve Canan Gunduz. “Assessment of Quality and Accuracy of YouTube Videos on Percutaneous Transthoracic Biopsy”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4, sy. 8 (Ağustos 2020): 627-30. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.778941.
EndNote	Gürkan O, Gunduz C (01 Ağustos 2020) Assessment of quality and accuracy of YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic biopsy. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4 8 627–630.
IEEE	O. Gürkan ve C. Gunduz, “Assessment of quality and accuracy of YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic biopsy”, J Surg Med, c. 4, sy. 8, ss. 627–630, 2020, doi: 10.28982/josam.778941.
ISNAD	Gürkan, Okan - Gunduz, Canan. “Assessment of Quality and Accuracy of YouTube Videos on Percutaneous Transthoracic Biopsy”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4/8 (Ağustos 2020), 627-630. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.778941.
JAMA	Gürkan O, Gunduz C. Assessment of quality and accuracy of YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic biopsy. J Surg Med. 2020;4:627–630.
MLA	Gürkan, Okan ve Canan Gunduz. “Assessment of Quality and Accuracy of YouTube Videos on Percutaneous Transthoracic Biopsy”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, c. 4, sy. 8, 2020, ss. 627-30, doi:10.28982/josam.778941.
Vancouver	Gürkan O, Gunduz C. Assessment of quality and accuracy of YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic biopsy. J Surg Med. 2020;4(8):627-30.