Araştırma Makalesi

Can we predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene?

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 12 1 Aralık 2020
PDF İndir
EN TR

Can we predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene?

Abstract

Aim: Fournier’s gangrene (FG) is a rapidly progressing and highly mortal necrotizing fasciitis that develops due to polymicrobial infection of the genital, perineal and perianal regions. Advanced age, comorbidities, width of the infected area, leukocyte-lymphocyte ratio, number of debridement performed, and Fournier’s gangrene severity index (FGSI) score are reported as prognostic factors for FG. In our study, we aimed to present the clinical and laboratory findings that can be used to predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the files of 83 patients treated for FG were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, laboratory findings, treatments, age adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), FGSI score, LRINEC score, complications and mortality were noted. Risk factors affecting mortality were determined. Results: Male/female ratio was 7.3. The mean age of the patients were 55.4 years. The mortality rate was 21.7%. The mean ACCI scores (Mortality group: 6.00 (2.72), survivors’ group: 2.66 (2.39)) and FGSI scores (Mortality group; 11.22 (3.2), survivors’ group; 3.25 (2.08)) of non-surviving patients were higher than those of survivors (P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively). Also, the mean neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (Mortality group: 21.05 (15.67), survivors’ group: 11.62 (10.50), (P=0.013), and the mean LRINEC score (Mortality group: 7.17 (2.03), survivors’ group: 3.18 (2.59)) (P=0.001) were higher among non-survivors. Cut off values for FGSI score, LRINEC, ACCI, and neutrophil / lymphocyte ratio were 7.5 (94.4% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity), 4.5 (94.4% sensitivity and 67.7% specificity), 3.5 (77.8% sensitivity and 73.8% specificity), and 8.70 (72.2% sensitivity and 52.3% specificity), respectively, in predicting mortality. Mortality was higher in female patients compared to males (P=0.02), and among the diabetics (P=0.05). Conclusion: We think that risk factors such as advanced age, diabetes, female gender, high ACCI score, high FGSI scores, high LRINEC scores and high neutrophil lymphocyte ratio are predictive of poor prognosis in FG.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Smith GL, Bunker CB, Dinneen MD. Fournier’s gangrene. Br J Urol. 1998;81:347-55.
  2. 2. Korkut M, Içöz G, Dayangaç M, Akgün E, Yeniay L, Erdoğan O, et al. Outcome analysis in patients with Fournier’s gangrene: report of 45 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:649-52.
  3. 3. Aşgın N, Satılmış Ş. Which antibiotics should we prefer empirical treatment of urinary tract infections in elderly patients? J Surg Med. 2019;3(12):856-60.
  4. 4. Thwaini A, Khan A, Malik A, Cherian J, Barua J, Shergill I, et al. Fournier’s gangrene and its emergency management. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:516-9.
  5. 5. Sorensen MD, Krieger JN, Rivara FP, Klein MB, Wessells H. Fournier’s gangrene: management and mortality predictors in a population based study. J Urol. 2009;182:2742-7.
  6. 6. Kahramanca Ş, Kaya, O, Özgehan, G, Irem B, Dural I, Küçükpınar T, et al. Are neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as effective as Fournier’s gangrene severity index for predicting the number of debridements in Fourner’s gangrene? Ulus Travma Acil Cerr Derg. 2014;Mar;20(2):107-12.
  7. 7. Laor E, Palmer LS, Tolia BM, Reid RE, Winter HI. Outcome prediction in patients with Fournier’s gangrene. J Urol. 1995;154:89-92.
  8. 8. Sallami S, Maalla R, Gammoudi A, Ben Jdidia G, Tarhouni L, Horchani A. Fournier’s gangrene: what are the prognostic factors? Our experience with 40 patients. Tunis Med. 2012;Oct;90(10):708-14.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Üroloji

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Aralık 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Kasım 2020

Kabul Tarihi

14 Ocak 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 12

Kaynak Göster

APA
Özlülerden, Y., Başer, A., Çelen, S., & Alkış, O. (2020). Can we predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene? Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 4(12), 1157-1160. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.826917
AMA
1.Özlülerden Y, Başer A, Çelen S, Alkış O. Can we predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene? J Surg Med. 2020;4(12):1157-1160. doi:10.28982/josam.826917
Chicago
Özlülerden, Yusuf, Aykut Başer, Sinan Çelen, ve Okan Alkış. 2020. “Can we predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene?”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4 (12): 1157-60. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.826917.
EndNote
Özlülerden Y, Başer A, Çelen S, Alkış O (01 Aralık 2020) Can we predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene? Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4 12 1157–1160.
IEEE
[1]Y. Özlülerden, A. Başer, S. Çelen, ve O. Alkış, “Can we predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene?”, J Surg Med, c. 4, sy 12, ss. 1157–1160, Ara. 2020, doi: 10.28982/josam.826917.
ISNAD
Özlülerden, Yusuf - Başer, Aykut - Çelen, Sinan - Alkış, Okan. “Can we predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene?”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4/12 (01 Aralık 2020): 1157-1160. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.826917.
JAMA
1.Özlülerden Y, Başer A, Çelen S, Alkış O. Can we predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene? J Surg Med. 2020;4:1157–1160.
MLA
Özlülerden, Yusuf, vd. “Can we predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene?”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, c. 4, sy 12, Aralık 2020, ss. 1157-60, doi:10.28982/josam.826917.
Vancouver
1.Yusuf Özlülerden, Aykut Başer, Sinan Çelen, Okan Alkış. Can we predict poor prognosis in Fournier gangrene? J Surg Med. 01 Aralık 2020;4(12):1157-60. doi:10.28982/josam.826917