Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 1 Şubat 2022
PDF İndir
EN

Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study

Abstract

Background/Aim: Cell count measurement methods in the synovial fluid are still a current problem in orthopedic practice. Knowing the cell count in the synovial fluid is important for the assessment of a variety of orthopedic and rheumatologic diseases. We aimed to assess the correlation of WBC and RBC results obtained with a complete blood count analyzer with that obtained by a manual cell count. Methods: The WBC and RBC count in the synovial fluid of 43 patients undergoing gonarthrosis surgery were determined by a Mindray BC-6800 hematology analyzer. The study groups were defined as manual cell count (MC), hemogram mode (HM), and body fluid mode (BFM). All samples were analyzed twice consecutively, and the mean results were calculated. Cell counting was performed using different methods in the same samples and compared statistically. Results: The mean age of the patients was 60.9 years, and there were 17 males (39.5%) and 26 females (60.5%). The WBC and RBC counts in the synovial fluid samples were determined using manual cell count, and the HM and BFM on a Mindray BC-6800 automatic hematology analyzer. WBC counts significantly differed between MC and BFM, and RBC counts significantly differed between HM-MC and HM-BFM (P=0.001, P=0.001, P=0.001, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between BFM and MC in WBC counts (r=0.633, P<0.001), with no statistically significant correlations identified between other methods. For RBC counts, there was a significant positive correlation between BFM and MC results (r=0.363, P=0.032). Conclusion: While the body fluid mode in hematology analyzers can be recommended for obtaining an RBC count in the synovial fluid, the hemogram mode may be recommended for the WBC count.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Buoro S, Seghezzi M, Manenti B, Mecca T, Candiago E, Vidali M, et al. Reliability of automated synovial fluid cell counting with Mindray BC-6800 body fluid mode. International journal of laboratory hematology. 2017;39(3):337–46.
  2. 2. Sternbach GL, Baker FJ. The emergency joint: arthrocentesis and synovial fluid analysis. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians. 1976;5(10):787-92.
  3. 3. Cho J, Oh J, Lee SG, Lee YH, Song J, Kim JH. Performance Evaluation of Body Fluid Cellular Analysis Using the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Sysmex XN-350, and UF-5000 Automated Cellular Analyzers. Annals of laboratory medicine. 2020;40(2):122-30.
  4. 4. Sandhaus LM. Body fluid cell counts by automated methods. Clinics in laboratory medicine. 2015;35(1):93-103.
  5. 5. Fleming C, Russcher H, Lindemans J, de Jonge R. Clinical relevance and contemporary methods for counting blood cells in body fluids suspected of inflammatory disease. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2015;53(11):1689-706.
  6. 6. Karataş Ö, Tuncer T. Pseudo-septic arthritis developed after hyaluronic acid injection: A case report. J Surg Med. 2019;3(3):278-9.
  7. 7. Fuster O, Andino B, Pardo A, Laiz B. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, ascitic and pleural body fluids evaluation with the Mindray BC-6800 hematology analyzer. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 2018;32(2):e22240.
  8. 8. Pascual E, Batlle-Gualda E, Martínez A, Rosas J, Vela P. Synovial fluid analysis for diagnosis of intercritical gout. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1999;131(10):756-9.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ortopedi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Şubat 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

20 Eylül 2021

Kabul Tarihi

2 Şubat 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Alıç, T., Şahin, M., Savcı, Ü., Çalbıyık, M., & Kayadibi, H. (2022). Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 6(2), 98-101. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.997894
AMA
1.Alıç T, Şahin M, Savcı Ü, Çalbıyık M, Kayadibi H. Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study. J Surg Med. 2022;6(2):98-101. doi:10.28982/josam.997894
Chicago
Alıç, Taner, Mustafa Şahin, Ünsal Savcı, Murat Çalbıyık, ve Hüseyin Kayadibi. 2022. “Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 6 (2): 98-101. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.997894.
EndNote
Alıç T, Şahin M, Savcı Ü, Çalbıyık M, Kayadibi H (01 Şubat 2022) Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 6 2 98–101.
IEEE
[1]T. Alıç, M. Şahin, Ü. Savcı, M. Çalbıyık, ve H. Kayadibi, “Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study”, J Surg Med, c. 6, sy 2, ss. 98–101, Şub. 2022, doi: 10.28982/josam.997894.
ISNAD
Alıç, Taner - Şahin, Mustafa - Savcı, Ünsal - Çalbıyık, Murat - Kayadibi, Hüseyin. “Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 6/2 (01 Şubat 2022): 98-101. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.997894.
JAMA
1.Alıç T, Şahin M, Savcı Ü, Çalbıyık M, Kayadibi H. Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study. J Surg Med. 2022;6:98–101.
MLA
Alıç, Taner, vd. “Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, c. 6, sy 2, Şubat 2022, ss. 98-101, doi:10.28982/josam.997894.
Vancouver
1.Taner Alıç, Mustafa Şahin, Ünsal Savcı, Murat Çalbıyık, Hüseyin Kayadibi. Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study. J Surg Med. 01 Şubat 2022;6(2):98-101. doi:10.28982/josam.997894