The Interpretation of Graphical Features Applied to Mapping SWOT by the Architecture Students in the Design Studio

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to gain an understanding of how the architecture students deploy a range of graphical features to visualize SWOT, standing for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. Architectural design studios provide students with a range of analytical techniques, and SWOT analysis is considered to be useful and effective, particularly at urban-scale design projects. However, it is a text-based framework and needs to be converted to thematic analysis maps across architecture and design fields. The main issue is that the determining factors affecting the way in which students choose graphical features to map the outputs of SWOT analysis is unclear at architectural design studios. The research employed qualitative methods, specifically observation, focus group, and graphical analysis, to examine SWOT maps produced by the architecture students. The findings demonstrated that the selection of graphical features in the process of producing SWOT analysis maps are dependent on scale of study (macro, meso, and micro), as well as location, spatial connection, and size of elements derived from SWOT matrix. For instance, lines and planes were most frequent features at macro level while the variety of symbols remarkably increased at micro level. In conclusion, the students personalized the process of mapping, meaning that they applied point, line, plane (shape), color, texture, and typography in several different ways. Therefore, SWOT analysis not only help architecture students to better understand the problems of their design projects, organize and consolidate information, and visualize opportunities and constraints, but could lead to the representation of realistic solutions in an innovative way.

Keywords

• Architectural Design Studio
• Graphical Features
• Graphical Techniques
• SWOT Map

References

1. Alexander, C., & Chermayeff, S. (1965). Community and privacy: Toward a new architecture of humanism (1th ed.). New York: Mass Publisher.
2. Altman, I., & Chemers, M. M. (1984). Culture and environment. California: CUP Archive.
3. APA, A. (2006). Planning and urban design standards. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
4. Bonnes, M., & Bonaiuto, M. (2002). Environmental psychology: From spatial-physical environment to sustainable development. In R. B. Bechtel, & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 28-54). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
5. Brewera, C. A., MacEachrena, A. M., Pickleb, L. W., & Herrmann, D. (1997). Mapping mortality: Evaluating color schemes for choropleth maps. Annual of the Association of American Geographers, 87(3), 411-438.
6. Carmona, M. (2001). Housing design quality: Through policy, guidance and review. London: Spon Press, Taylor & Francis.
7. Ching, F. D. (2010). Design drawing (Second ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
8. Cho, J. (2017). An investigation of design studio performance in relation to creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive style. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 67-78.

9. Chu, X. Z., Gao, L., Qiu, H.-B., Li, W.-D., & Shao, X.-Y. (2010). An expert system using rough sets theory and self-organizing maps to design space exploration of complex products. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(11), 7364-7372.
10. Curtis, J. W. (2012). Integrating sketch maps with GIS to explore fear of crime in the urban environment: A review of the past and prospects for the future. Cartography and Geographical Information Science, 39(4), 175-186.
11. Dandekar, H. C. (1988). Qualitative method in urban planning (Edit by Catanese, A. J and Snyder, J. C, Second ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Dua, S., Fengb, C. C., & Guoc, L. (2015). Integrative representation and inference of qualitative locations about points, lines, and polygons. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(6), 980–1006.
13. Dyson, R. G. (2004). Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 631-640.
14. Ercoskun, O. Y. (2012). Green and ecological technologies for urban planning: Creating smart cities. Hershey: Information Science Reference.
15. Etongo, D., Kanninen, M., Epule, T. E., & Fobissie, K. (2018, May). Assessing the effectiveness of joint forest management in Southern Burkina Faso: A SWOT-AHP analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 90, 31-38.
16. Fadel, M. E., Rachid, G., El-Samra, R., & Boutro, G. (2013). Knowledge management mapping and gap analysis in renewable energy: Towards a sustainable framework in developing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20, 576-584.
17. FAED, F. o. (2009). Program specification of architecture. Kigali: University of Rwanda.
18. Faryling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Design Papers, 1(1), 1-5.
19. Gasselt, S. V., & Nass, A. (2011). Planetary map data model for geologic mapping. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 38(2), 201-212.
20. Ghazinoorya, S., Abdia, M., & Mehrb, M. A. (2011). SWOT methodology: A state of the art review for the past, a framework for the future. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 12(1), 24-48.
21. Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123-143. Goldschmidt, G. (1992). Serial sketching: Visual problem solving in designing. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 23(2), 191-219.
22. Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2002). Architectural research methods. New York: John Willy and Sons Publisher.
23. Harwood, D., & Rawlings, K. (2001). Assessing young children's freehand sketch maps of the world. International Research in Geographic and Environment Education, 10(1), 20-45.
24. Hedman, R., & Jaszewski, A. (1984). Fundamentals of urban design. New Jersey: Planners Press, American Planning Association.
25. Jessica, R. G., Kruse, G. H., & Miller, S. A. (2015). Socioeconomic considerations of the commercial weathervane scallop fishery off Alaska using SWOT analysis. Ocean & Coastal Management, 105, 154-165.
26. Jiang, B. (2015). The fractal nature of maps and mapping. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(1), 159–174.
27. Kalafsky, R. V., & Sonnichsen, T. (2015). Employing SWOT analysis in coursework on the geographies of regional economic development and trade. Journal of Geography, 114(5), 177-187.
28. Kim, E., & Kim, K. (2015). Cognitive styles in design problem solving: Insights from network-based cognitive maps. Design Studies, 40, 1-38.
29. Krippendorff, K. H. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3 ed.). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
30. Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., & Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis- a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41-52.
31. Laseau, P. (2000). Graphic thinking for architects and designers (3th ed.). New York: Wiley. Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think: The design process demystified, (4th Edition ed.). Oxford, UK: Architectural Press,.
32. Lee, H., Yuan, T., Jung, H. C., & Beighley, E. (2015). Mapping wetland water depths over the central Congo Basin using PALSAR ScanSAR, Envisat altimetry, and MODIS VCF data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 159, 70-79.
33. Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: an inquiry into a socio-spatial processes. London: Willy.
34. Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private space of the city. London: Routledge.
35. Metz, H. M. (1990). Sketch maps: Helping students get the big picture. Journal of Geography, 89(3), 114-118.
36. Miller, G., Dingwall, R., & Morphy, E. (2004). Using qualitative data and analysis. In D. Silverman, Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2th ed., pp. 325-341). London: Sage Publications.
37. Moughtin, C. J., Cuesta, R., Sarris, C., & Laurea, P. S. (1999). Urban design: Method and techniques. London: Architecture Press, Second Edition.
38. Mugerauer, R. (1995). Interpreting environments: Tradition, deconstruction, hermeneutics. Texas: University of Texas Press.
39. Neuman, L. W. (2009). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th edition ed.). New York: Pearson.
40. Okebukola, P. A. (1992). Can good concept mappers be good problem solvers in science? Education Psychology: an International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 12(2), 113-129.
41. Otto, J. C., Gustavsson, M., & Geil, M. (2011). Design, symbolisation and visualisation of geomorphological maps. Developments in Earth Surface Processes, 15, 253-295.
42. Oxman, R. (2004). Think-maps: teaching design thinking in design education. Design Studies, 25(1), 63-91.
43. Panek, J. (2015). How participatory mapping can drive community empowerment – a case study of Koffiekraal, South Africa. South African Geographical Journal, 97(1), 18-30.
44. Parker, B. (2006). Constructing community through maps? Power and praxis in community mapping. The Professional Geographer, 58(4), 470-484.
45. Pavelsky, T. M., Durand, M. T., Andreadis, K. M., Beighley, E. R., Paiva, R. C., Allen, G. H., & Miller, Z. F. (2014). Assessing the potential global extent of SWOT river discharge observations. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 1516-1525.
46. Pearsalla, H., Hawthorneb, T., Block, D., Louise , B., Walkerd , E., & Masucci, M. (2014). Exploring youth socio-spatial perceptions of higher education landscapes through sketch maps. , Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(1), 111-130.
47. Reed, S. K. (2012). Learning by mapping across situations. Journal of the Learning Science, 21(3), 353-398.
48. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion Ink.
49. Scolozzi, R., Schirpke, U., Morri, E., & D'Amato, D. (2014). Ecosystem services-based SWOT analysis of protected areas for conservation strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 543-551.
50. Sevkli, M., Oztekin, A., Uysal, O., & Torlak, G. (2012). Development of a fuzzy ANP based SWOT analysis for the airline industry in Turkey. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 14-24.
51. Shive, J., & Francis, G. (2008). Applying models of visual search to map display design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(2), 67-77.
52. Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. New York: SAGE Publications Ltd.
53. Tafahomi, R. (2009). Application the visual and graphical techniques of urban design in urban vision document. Journal of Shar Negar (City Writer), 52, 25-35.
54. Tafahomi, R. (2014). Constituting of urban design framework through urban design deficiencies. Hamburg: Lambert Academic Publisher.
55. Tafahomi, R. (2020). Educational outcome of students’ group-table arrangement for collaboration in architectural thesis studio. LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research, 17(2), 22-46.
56. Tafahomi, R. (2021a). Application of physical and nonphysical elements in the conservation of historic core of city. South African Journal of Geomatics, 10(1), 75-86. doi:10.4314/sajg.v10i1.6
57. Tafahomi, R. (2021b). Insight into a personalized procedure of design in concept generation by the students in architecture thesis projects. Journal of Design Studio, 3(1), 5-18. doi:10.46474/jds.910234
58. Tafahomi, R., & Lamit, H. B. (2011). Environment as a pattern for design: Case of study Shandize valley in Mashhad, Iran. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 1(1), 11-16.
59. Tafahomi, R., & Nadi, R. (2016). Dehistoricisation the urban landscape through transition of the enclosure ratio in urban fabric of Gonabad city in Iran. J Archit Eng Tech, Volume 5(Issue 2). doi:10.4172/2168-9717.1000162
60. Tafahomi, R., & Nadi, R. (2020). Derivation of a design solution for the conservation of a historical Payab in the redevelopment of Doloeei, Gonabad. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 7(1), 1-9. doi:10.11113/ijbes.v7.n1.407
61. Taketa, R. (1996). Using field sketch mapping to teach basic mapping concepts in elementary school geography. Journal of Geography, 95(3), 126-130.
62. Thomas, D. (2002). Architecture and urban environment: A vision for new age. Oxford: Architectural Press.
63. Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space: Theories of urban design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
64. Tschumi, B. (1997). Architecture and disjunction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
65. Tschumi, B. (2014). Notations: Diagrams and sequences. New York: Artifice Books on Architecture.
66. Umek, M. (2003). A comparison of the effectiveness of drawing maps and reading maps in beginning map teaching. International Research in Geographic and Environment Education, 12(1), 18-31.
67. Vermeersch, L., & Vandenbroucke, A. (2014). Schools and cultural organisations: Natural partners in art and cultural education (ACE)? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1032-1039.
68. White, E. T. (1983). Site analysis: Diagramming information for architectural design. Tallahassee, Florida: Architectural Media Ltd.
69. Zeisel, J. (1984). Inquiry by design: Tools for environment-behavior research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.