ULUSLARARASI KURULUŞLAR PERSPEKTİFİNDEN YEŞİL KAMU MALİ YÖNETİMİ ARAÇLARI VE ÖZEL SEKTÖR YATIRIMLARI: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ

Öz

Bu çalışma, uluslararası kuruluşların geliştirdiği Yeşil Kamu Mali Yönetimi yaklaşımı ile özel sektörün yeşil yatırımlarını ele alan akademik literatürü bibliyometrik yöntemle incelemektedir. Scopus’tan elde edilen 191 ve 279 makalelik iki veri seti, VOSviewer ile anahtar kelime birlikte görülme, zamansal gelişim ve yoğunluk analizlerine tabi tutulmuştur. İlk veri setinde yeşil mali politika, yeşil bütçeleme, sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve yeşil finans; ikinci veri setinde yeşil yatırım, karbon vergisi, iklim politikası ve çevresel sürdürülebilirlik öne çıkmıştır. Bulgular, yeşil finansın iki literatür arasında köprü kurduğunu, kurumsal ve bütçesel araçların özel yatırımlara çoğunlukla dolaylı kanallardan yansıdığını göstermektedir. Yeşil dönüşüm, mali, finansal ve düzenleyici araçların bütünleşik biçimde tasarlanmasını gerektirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yeşil kamu mali yönetimi
• yeşil yatırım
• yeşil bütçeleme

GREEN PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INSTRUMENTS AND PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENTS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Öz

This study bibliometrically examines the academic literature on the Green Public Financial Management approach developed by international organizations and private-sector green investment. Two Scopus datasets comprising 191 and 279 articles were analysed in VOSviewer through keyword co-occurrence, overlay, and density visualizations. Green fiscal policy, green budgeting, sustainable development, and green finance dominated the first dataset, while green investment, carbon taxation, climate policy, and environmental sustainability were prominent in the second. The findings show that green finance bridges the two fields, whereas institutional and budgetary instruments generally influence private investment through indirect channels. The study concludes that the green transition requires an integrated policy framework in which fiscal, financial, regulatory, and institutional instruments are designed coherently.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• green public financial management
• green investment
• green budgeting

Kaynakça

1. Ahmi, A., Yau, A., & Miraz, M. H. (2026). Carbon taxation as a catalyst for sustainable development: Insights from five decades of global research. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 17(2), 456–483.
2. Apriantoro, M. S., & Maulana, I. (2025). Environmental taxation through a bibliometric lens: Finding leading voices, trends, and gaps. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 15(2), 484–494.
3. Arjomandi, A., Gholipour, H. F., Tajaddini, R., & Harvie, C. (2023). Environmental expenditure, policy stringency and green economic growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Applied Economics, 55(8), 869–884.
4. Bozatli, O., Erdem, A., Aydin, M., & Bektur, C. (2026). Towards SDG-aligned carbon neutrality in EU countries: How energy policy, energy R&D budget, and sustainable growth shape the transition? Sustainable Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70848.
5. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
6. Erdem, A., Okoth, E., Demirtaş, N., & Ünalan, G. (2026). Determining sustainable development dynamics in E7 economies: Impacts of green energy transition, environmental sustainability, institutional quality and human development. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-026-07887-0
7. Gonguet, F., Wendling, C., Aydın, Ö., & Battersby, B. (2021). Climate-sensitive management of public finances—Green PFM. IMF Staff Climate Notes, 2021/002. International Monetary Fund.
8. International Monetary Fund. (2023). Fiscal monitor: Climate crossroads—Fiscal policies in a warming world. International Monetary Fund.

9. Johansen, R. (2022). Oslo is demonstrating ambitious leadership through its climate budget. Journal of City Climate Policy and Economy, 1(1), 61–64.
10. Koç, H. (2025). Bibliometric analysis of green finance research using science mapping technique. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 10(1), 91–123.
11. Lobonț, O. R., Bărbulescu, M. A., Criste, C., Ran, T., & Moldovan, N. C. (2025). Paying the price to power the future: Environmental taxation, energy transition, and Europe’s Green Deal. Energies, 18(22), 5902. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18225902
12. Manes Rossi, F., Brusca, I., Cohen, S., Caperchione, E., & Thomasson, A. (2025). Public financial management for Sustainable Development Goals: Challenges, experiences, and perspectives. Financial Accountability & Management, 41(3), 484–489.
13. Marchewka-Bartkowiak, K. (2023). The European Union Emission Trading System and its role for green budgeting development—The case of EU member states. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 65, 101390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101390
14. Meng, F. (2024). Driving sustainable development: Fiscal policy and the promotion of natural resource efficiency. Resources Policy, 90, 104687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104687
15. Mohammed Radeef, K. M., & Velmurugan, G. (2025). Mapping the landscape of green investment research. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(1), 595–615.
16. Muchiri, M. K., Erdei-Gally, S., Fekete-Farkas, M., & Lakner, Z. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of green finance and climate change in post-Paris Agreement era. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12), 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120561
17. Musah-Surugu, J. I., Owusu, K., Yankson, P. W. K., & Ayisi, E. K. (2018). Mainstreaming climate change into local governance: Financing and budgetary compliance in selected local governments in Ghana. Development in Practice, 28(1), 65–80.
18. Nakpodia, F., Sakariyahu, R., Fagbemi, T., Adigun, R., & Dosumu, O. (2024). Sustainable Development Goals, accounting practices and public financial management: A pre- and post-COVID-19 assessment. The British Accounting Review, 101466.
19. OECD. (2024a). Green budgeting in OECD countries 2024. OECD Publishing.
20. OECD. (2024b). Climate adaptation investment framework. OECD Publishing.
21. Patel, S. K., & Jhalani, P. (2024). Formulation of variables of environmental taxation: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus database (2001–2022). Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 7687–7714.
22. PEFA. (2020). PEFA climate framework: Pilot version. PEFA Secretariat.
23. PEFA. (2024). Supplementary framework for assessing climate-responsive public financial management (PEFA Climate). PEFA Secretariat.
24. United Nations Development Programme. (2022). Global climate public finance review. United Nations Development Programme.
25. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
26. World Bank. (2022). Disaster resilient and responsive public financial management: An assessment tool. World Bank.
27. Zehouani, N., & Ababou, M. (2025). Mapping research trends on foreign direct investment and environmental sustainability. Discover Global Society, 3, 73.
28. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629