EN
TR
Determining Y- And Z-Generations’ Discrimination and Attitudes Toward The Elderly
Öz
Objective: This study intends to specify the behavior of people from generations Y and Z regarding their discrimination against elderly people.
Methods: The participants were 261 members of generation Y and 240 from generation Z who voluntarily participated in the study. The data of the study were collected using the following tools: “Descriptive Feature Form,” “The Ageism Attitude Scale,” and “An Attitude Scale toward Aging and Elderliness.”
Results: In the study, it was determined that the total score average of the Ageism Attitude Scale was 86.02±11.45 for people born in Generation Y and 86.19±12.39 for people born in Generation Z. It was determined that the total score average of the Attitude Scale towards Old Age and Aging was 137.21±33.81 for people born in Generation Y and 138.60±32.65 for people born in Generation Z, and it was observed that the average scores were close to each other and the difference between them was not statistically significant (p>.05). In the study, it was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between marital status, education, income, presence of chronic disease and working in elderly care according to the average scores of the "Ageism Attitude Scale". In the study, it was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between occupation and the desire to live in the same house with the elderly, according to the average scores of the "Attitude Scale towards Old Age and Aging".
Conclusion: These results indicate that there are no significant differences in general attitudes between generations; however, factors such as marital status, education, income, presence of chronic illness, profession, and willingness to live with the elderly were found to have a significant impact. The study highlights the need to develop social and educational policies that focus on these influential factors to improve attitudes toward aging and the elderly.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Destekleyen Kurum
This research received a grant from TUBITAK (project no: 223S519).
Etik Beyan
This study was approved by the Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Date: 05.11.2020, Decision no: 09/29).
Teşekkür
We would like to thank all participants who contributed to this study. This study has been published as a thesis.
Kaynakça
- Ayalon, L. & Tesch-Römer, C. (2018). Contemporary perspectives on ageism. International Perspectives on Aging, (19). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8
- Başer, G. & Cingil, D. (2018). Attitudes toward the older persons and ageism attitudes of healthcare assistants working in nursing homes. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics, 21(3), 446-455. https://doi.org/10.31086/tjgeri.2018344060
- Başpınar, A., Şengelen, M. & Aslan, D. (2020). Ageism for the elderly from a public health perspective: Conceptual framework and prevention approaches. ESTÜDAM Journal of Public Health, 5(2), 334-345. https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.701995
- Bulut, E. & Çilingir, D. (2016). Attitudes of surgical nurses towards the elderly. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics, 19(4), 253-259.
- Burnes, D., Sheppard, C., Henderson, C. R., Jr, Wassel, M., Cope, R., Barber, C., & Pillemer, K. (2019). Interventions to reduce ageism against older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 109(8), e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305123
- Göktaş, H. (2021). The examination of 45-year-old and older people’s attitudes toward old age and quality of life in terms of sociodemographic characteristics. Trakya University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences e-Journal, 10(2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.47934/tife.10.02.04
- Güven, SD., Muz, GU. & Ertürk, NE. (2012). The attitudes of university students towards elderly discrimination and the relation of these attitudes with some variables. Anatolian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(2), 99-105.
- İletmiş, T. & Arpacı, F. (2017). Relationships determining the expectations of 45-59 age group individuals regarding old age periods. Journal of Research is Education and Society, 4(1), 49-62.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Erken Görünüm Tarihi
24 Nisan 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi
29 Nisan 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi
17 Eylül 2024
Kabul Tarihi
30 Mart 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2025 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1
APA
Ercan, G., & Türkoğlu, N. (2025). Determining Y- And Z-Generations’ Discrimination and Attitudes Toward The Elderly. Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi, 7(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.54061/jphn.1551582
AMA
1.Ercan G, Türkoğlu N. Determining Y- And Z-Generations’ Discrimination and Attitudes Toward The Elderly. Halk Sag Hem Der. 2025;7(1):13-22. doi:10.54061/jphn.1551582
Chicago
Ercan, Gizem, ve Nihan Türkoğlu. 2025. “Determining Y- And Z-Generations’ Discrimination and Attitudes Toward The Elderly”. Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi 7 (1): 13-22. https://doi.org/10.54061/jphn.1551582.
EndNote
Ercan G, Türkoğlu N (01 Nisan 2025) Determining Y- And Z-Generations’ Discrimination and Attitudes Toward The Elderly. Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi 7 1 13–22.
IEEE
[1]G. Ercan ve N. Türkoğlu, “Determining Y- And Z-Generations’ Discrimination and Attitudes Toward The Elderly”, Halk Sag Hem Der, c. 7, sy 1, ss. 13–22, Nis. 2025, doi: 10.54061/jphn.1551582.
ISNAD
Ercan, Gizem - Türkoğlu, Nihan. “Determining Y- And Z-Generations’ Discrimination and Attitudes Toward The Elderly”. Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi 7/1 (01 Nisan 2025): 13-22. https://doi.org/10.54061/jphn.1551582.
JAMA
1.Ercan G, Türkoğlu N. Determining Y- And Z-Generations’ Discrimination and Attitudes Toward The Elderly. Halk Sag Hem Der. 2025;7:13–22.
MLA
Ercan, Gizem, ve Nihan Türkoğlu. “Determining Y- And Z-Generations’ Discrimination and Attitudes Toward The Elderly”. Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi, c. 7, sy 1, Nisan 2025, ss. 13-22, doi:10.54061/jphn.1551582.
Vancouver
1.Gizem Ercan, Nihan Türkoğlu. Determining Y- And Z-Generations’ Discrimination and Attitudes Toward The Elderly. Halk Sag Hem Der. 01 Nisan 2025;7(1):13-22. doi:10.54061/jphn.1551582