EFFECTS of DIFFERENT VIOL TYPES on EGG QUALITIES in TABLE EGGS at DIFFERENT STORAGE TEMPERATURES

Yıl 2023, , 19 - 24, 23.06.2023

Zeynel Abidin Parmak Ali Aygün

https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1302523

Cited By: 1

Öz

The purpose of this research was to examine the impact of storing table hen eggs in egg cardboard viol, plastic box viol, and cardboard box viols at various temperatures on the egg qualities. A total of 300 table chicken eggs were used in the study. The eggs were randomly distributed into three groups: standard cardboard viol, plastic box viol, and cardboard box viol. The eggs were stored at room temperature and in the refrigerator for 28 days. On the 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of the experiment, ten eggs from each group were analyzed for egg weight loss, egg shell strength, Haugh unit, yolk index, and albumen pH. Viol type x storage temperature interaction effect was significant (P <0.05) only on egg weight loss, but its effect on other properties was insignificant. After 28 days of storage, egg weight loss was statistically insignificant between eggs stored in plastic box viols at 25℃ and eggs stored in cardboard viols at 4℃. The effect of viol types on egg shell strength, yolk index, Haugh unit, and albumen pH was insignificant. Egg weight loss was found to be better in plastic box viols than in other groups (P <0.05). Eggs stored in refrigerator conditions are better than egg stored room conditions in terms of egg quality criteria except eggshell strength (P <0.05). As a result, it would be more appropriate to store eggs in plastic box viols in order to preserve egg quality for a longer period of time

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cardboard viol, Plastic box viol, Cardboard box viol, Shell strength, Haugh unit

Destekleyen Kurum

This research is a summary of Zeynel Abdin Parmak's master's thesis, which was funded by Selcuk University

Proje Numarası

project number: 18201140

Kaynakça

• Akarca, G., Istek, Ö., Tomar, O. 2021. The Effect of Resin Coating on the Quality Characteristics of Chicken Eggs During Storage. Journal of Food Science, 86(4): 1243-1257.
• Aktan, S., Kampus, D. 2011. Effects of Age and Storage Duration on Relationships among Albumen Quality Traits and Egg Weight in Japanese Quails. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10 (Supplement): 3340 - 3344.
• Akyurek, H., Okur, A. A. 2009. Effect of Storage Time, Temperature and Hen Age on Egg Quality in Free-Range Layer Hens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(10): 1953-1958.
• Aygun, A. (2017). The Eggshell Microbial Activity. In P. Hester (Ed.), Egg Innovation and Strategies for Improvement (pp. 135-144). Academic Press, Elsevier.
• Baylan, M., Canogullari, S., Ayasan, T., Copur, G. 2011. Effects of Dietary Selenium Source, Storage Time, and Temperature on the Quality of Quail Eggs. Biological Trace Element Research, 143(2): 957-964.
• Brasil, R., Cruz, F., Rufino, J., Oliveira, P., Freitas, B., Viana, G. 2019. Physical-Chemical and Sensorial Quality of Eggs Coated with Copaiba Oil Biofilm and Stored at Room Temperature for Different Periods. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 21.
• Copur, G., Camcil, O., Sahinler, N., Gul, A. 2008. The Effect of Propolis Egg Shell Coatings on Interior Egg Quality. Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde, 72(1): 35-40.
• Didar, Z. 2019. Effects of Coatings with Pectin and Cinnamomum Verumhydrosolincluded Pectin on Physical Characteristics and Shelf Life of Chicken Eggs Stored at 30°C. Nutrition and Food Sciences Research, 6(4): 39-45.
• Drabik, K., Próchniak, T., Kasperek, K., Batkowska, J. 2021. The Use of the Dynamics of Changes in Table Eggs During Storage to Predict the Age of Eggs Based on Selected Quality Traits. Animals, 11(11): 3192.
• Düzgüneş, O., Kesici, T., Kavuncu, O. 1987. Ve Gürbüz, F. 1987. Araştırma ve Deneme Metodları.
• Eroglu, M., Baykalir, Y., Erisir, Z. 2021. The Effect of Different Storage Period on Some Egg Quality Characteristics and Ovalbumin Levels in Goose Eggs. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 33(8): 699-703.
• Funk, E. 1948. The Relation of the Yolk Index Determined in Natural Position to the Yolk Index as Determined after Separating the Yolk from the Albumen. Poultry science, 27(3): 367-367.
• Güler, G., Ayşe, Ş., Turgud, F. K., Tahtabiçen, E., Aylin, A., Samli, H. E. 2022. Effects of Propolis Extract Coating on Shelf Life and Quality Parameters of Eggs Obtained from Free-Range Hens. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 19(1): 89-100.
• Haugh, R. R. 1937. The Haugh Unit for Measuring Egg Quality. The US Egg Poultry Magazine, 43: 522-573.
• Jo, C., Ahn, D., Liu, X., Kim, K., Nam, K.-C. 2011. Effects of Chitosan Coating and Storage with Dry Ice on the Freshness and Quality of Eggs. Poultry science, 90(2): 467-472.
• Mathew, A. O., Olufemi, A. M., Foluke, A., Abel, O. 2016. Relationship of Temperature and Length of Storage on Ph of Internal Contents of Chicken Table Egg in Humid Tropics. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 32(3): 285-296.
• Puglisi, M. J., Fernandez, M. L. 2022. The Health Benefits of Egg Protein. Nutrients, 14(14): 2904.
• Samli, H., Agma, A., Senkoylu, N. 2005. Effects of Storage Time and Temperature on Egg Quality in Old Laying Hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 14(3): 548-553.
• Sarıca, M., Erensayın, C. (2014). Tavukçuluk Ürünleri. In M. Türkoğlu M. Sarıca (Eds.), Tavukçuluk Bilimi Yetiştirme, Besleme Ve Hastalıklar (Vol. 4, pp. 110-139.). Bey Ofset Matbaacılık.
• Sariyel, V., Aygun, A., Coklar, H., Narinc, D., Akbulut, M. 2022. Effects of Prestorage Application of Gum Arabic Coating on the Quality of Table Eggs During Storage. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3): 363-370.
• Sert, D., Aygun, A., Demir, M. 2011. Effects of Ultrasonic Treatment and Storage Temperature on Egg Quality. Poultry science, 90(4): 869-875.
• Sheng, L., Huang, M., Wang, J., Xu, Q., Hammad, H., Ma, M. 2018. A Study of Storage Impact on Ovalbumin Structure of Chicken Egg. Journal of Food Engineering, 219: 1-7.
• Shin, D., Narciso‐Gaytán, C., Regenstein, J. M., Sánchez‐Plata, M. X. 2012. Effect of Various Refrigeration Temperatures on Quality of Shell Eggs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 92(7): 1341-1345
• Silversides, F., Budgell, K. 2004. The Relationships among Measures of Egg Albumen Height, Ph, and Whipping Volume. Poultry science, 83(10): 1619-1623.
• Stadelman, W. (1995). The Preservation of Quality in Shell Eggs. In W. Stadelman O. J. Cotterill (Eds.), Egg Science and Technology (Vol. 4, pp. 67-79). Food Products Press.
• Şenköylü, N. (2001). Modern Tavuk Üretimi (Vol. 3. Baskı). Anadolu Matbaacılık.
• Tan, F., Rungruengpet, W., Simsiri, U., Kaewkot, C., Sun, Y., Chumngoen, W. 2022. Influences of Egg Washing and Storage Temperature on Quality and Shelf Life of Duck Eggs During Storage. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 24(4): 1-8.
• Tian, Y., Zhu, H., Zhang, L., Chen, H. 2022. Consumer Preference for Nutritionally Fortified Eggs and Impact of Health Benefit Information. Foods, 11(8): 1145.
• Yenilmez, F., Bulancak, A. 2020. Microbiological Quality of Table Eggs Sold at Different Sales Location. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 35(2): 115-124.