Educat?ng for Democrat?c Soc?et?es: Imped?ments

Abstract

The paper offers a robust definition of democracy that focuses upon the decision making processes of democratic societies that are dependent on the ability and willingness of citizens to enter into a democratic dialectic in which informed opinions contend with one another in the public forum so that the best possible decisions can be made in regard to public policy and action. Opinion, informed and justified in reason, is to be respected in such societies and cultivated through a proper system of education that teaches students how to determine the respectability of opinions offered and to formulate and articulate opinions worthy of respect. Impediments to the development of skills, knowledge, and dispositions essential the development of opinion worthy of respect and the critique of opinion for its respect-worthiness are considered, particularly those generated by forces of economy, religion, and notions of state and nation. The conclusion argues for schools that are respectful of the individual capacities of students, particularly their ability to formulate unique understandings of the phenomenon that come before them and to offer to society novel ideas, in the form of opinion, that deserve the consideration of others in the democratic decision making process.

Keywords

• democracy, schools, and impediments

Kaynakça

1. Barkan, J. (2011). Got Dough? How Billionaires Rule Our Schools. Retrieved on May 29, 2012, from http://dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=3781.
2. Barnes, B. and Chozick, A. (2012). Media Companies, Seeing Profit Slip, Push Into Education. New York Times. Retreived from http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/23/news-corporation-forms-new- brand-for-education-division/.
3. Cohozick, A. (2012). News corporation forms new brand for education division. New York Times Media Decoder. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/20/technology/discovery-invests-in-digital- textbooks-in-hopes-of-growth.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
4. Coles, G. (2012). Comprehending DIBELS. Jamaica Plain, MA: National Center for Fair and Open Testing. Retrieved from http://www.fairtest.org/comprehending- dibels.
5. Dewey, J. (1937). Democracy and Educational Administration. School and Society, 45, 457-67.
6. Feire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.
7. Green, A. S. (1995). The Pledge of Allegiance problem. Fordham Law Review, 64, 2. Retrieved November 9, 2012 from http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3204&context=flr.
8. Howe, K. (1992). Liberal democracy, equal educational opportunity, and the challenge of multiculturalism. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 455-470.

9. McMaster, J. (2007). Judgment day: Evolution on trial. Nova. In McMaster, J, Gary Johnstone, G., and Tovell, V. Boston, WGBH for PBS.
10. Moffett, J. (1992). Harmonic learning: Keynoting school reform. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
11. Moffett, J., and Wagner, B. J. (1991). Student centered language arts, K-12, 4th edition.
12. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton-Cook.
13. Moyers, B. (2007). Buying the war. Bill Moyers journal. In Moyers, B. NY: Public Affairs Television.
14. Reich, R. B. (2008). Supercapitalism: The transformation of business, democracy, and everyday life. Great Barrington, MA.
15. Stelter, B. & Arango, T. (2010, November). News Corp. Reels In a Top Educator. Retrieved on May 28, 2012, from http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/09/news-corp-reels-in-a-top- educator/.
16. Thelen, H. A. (1981). The Classroom Society: Croom Helm Curriculum Policy and Research Series. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons Publication Inc.
17. USC Rossier Online Staff. (2011). U.S. education spending and performance vs. the world. Retreived November 10, 2012 from http://rossieronline.usc.edu/u-s- education-versus-the-world-infographic/.