Elementary education students’ perceptions of “good” citizenship

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 21 - 36, 22.05.2011

Jason L. O'brien Jason M. Smith

Öz

The purpose of this study was to investigate how elementary pre-service teachers perceive of ‘good’ citizenship. Prior to any instruction in their methods courses, 309 pre-service elementary teachers from nine different states were asked to respond to the prompt “What is a good citizen?” The two most common responses were “helping others/community involvement” (n=180) and “following laws” (n=163). Using the framework created by Westheimer and Kahne (2004), the authors make the conclusion that a majority of undergraduates have adopted a “Personally Responsible” model of citizenship. The authors argue that social studies methods instructors should attempt to move students in the direction of adopting a more “justice-oriented” model of citizenship when teaching elementary students in their future classrooms.

Anahtar Kelimeler

good citizenship, preservice elementary teachers

Kaynakça

• Anderson, C., Avery, P., Pederson, P., Smith, E., & Sullivan, J. (1997). Divergent perspectives on citizenship education. A Q-method study and survey of social studies teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 333-364.
• Babbie, E. (2004). The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Barton, K., & Levstik, L. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Brighton, C.M. (2002). Straddling the fence: Implementing best practices in the age of accountability. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 30-33.
• Chiodo, J., & Martin, L. (2005). What do students have to say about citizenship? An analysis of the concept of citizenship among secondary education students. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 29(1), 23-31.
• Conover, P. & Searing, D. (2000). A political socialization perspective. In L. McDonnell, P. Timpane, & R. Benjamin (Eds.), Rediscovering the democratic purposes of education (pp. 91-126). Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas.
• Davis, S. & Davis, J. (2007). Making the case for social studies—It’s our responsibility. Nation Council for the Social Studies: Washington, D.C. Retrieved June 24, 2010, from http://www.ncss.org/advocacy.
• Duplass, J. (2008). Teaching elementary social studies: Strategies, Standards, and internet resources (2 nd
• ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
• Fernandez, O. (2005). Towards European citizenship through higher education? European Journal of Education, 40(1), 60-80.
• Gagnon, P. (2003). Educating democracy: State standards to ensure a civic core. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
• Gallavan, N. (2008). Examining teacher candidates’ views on world citizenship. The Social Studies, 99(6), 249-254.
• Galston, W. (2008). Civic knowledge, civic education, and civic engagement: A summary of recent research. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(7), 623-642.
• Hahn, C. (1999). Citizenship education: An empirical study of policy, practices, and outcomes,
• Oxford Review of Education, 25(3), 231-250.
• Hinde, E. (2005). Revisiting curriculum integration: A fresh look at an old idea. The Social Studies, 96(3), 105-111.
• Houser, N. (1995). Social studies on the back burner: Views from the field. Theory and Research in Social Education, 23(2), 147-168.
• Jennings, T., Croswell, S. & Fernlund, P. (1994). Social justice in the elementary classroom. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 7(1), 4-6.
• Kahne, J., & Sporte, S. (2008). Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students’ commitment to civic participation. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 738-766.
• Kemper, E., Stringfield, S, & Teddlie, C. (2003). Sampling strategies in social science research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 273-296). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. (1977). "The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data" Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
• Lutkus, A. & Weiss, A. (2007). The Nation’s Report Card: Civics 2006 (NCES 2007–476). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• Martin, L. & Chiodo, J. (2007). Good citizenship: What do rural students have to say about it? Theory and Research in Social Education, 35(1), 112-127.
• Martin, L.A. (2008) Elementary and secondary teacher education students’ perspectives on citizenship. Action in Teacher Education, 30(3), 54-63.
• McGuire, M. & Cole, B. (2005). Using storypath to give young learners a fair start. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 18(2), 20-23.
• National Council for the Social Studies (2005). Mission Statement. Retrieved May 18, 2010, from http://www.socialstudies.org/about/.
• National Association of Secretaries of State. (1999). New Millennium Project, part 1: American youth attitudes on policies, citizenship, government, and voting. Washington, D.C.
• National Council for the Social Studies. (1989). Essential Skills of a Social Studies Education. Retrieved June 5, 2010, from http://www.socialstudies.org/standards/
• Parker, W., Glenn, A. & Mizoue, Y. (1997). Japanese and American pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards global issues and relations. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 187- 202.
• Piven, F. (2008). Challenging authority: How ordinary people change America. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
• Rock, T., Heafner, T., O’Connor, K, Passe, J., Oldendorf, S., Good, A., Byrd, S. (2006). One state closer to a national crisis: A report on elementary social studies in North Carolina. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(4), 455-483.
• Robbins, M., Francis, L. & Elliott, E. (2003). Attitudes toward education for global citizenship among trainee teachers. Research in Education, 69(1), 93-98.
• Smith, J., & Kovacs, P. (2011). The Impact of Standards Based Reform on Teachers: The Case of ‘No Child Left Behind.’ Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 34-42.
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing.
• Thornton, S. & Houser, N. (1996). The status of the elementary social studies in Delaware: Views from the field. (ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education, ED 404 239).
• Tishman, S., Jay, E., & Perkins, D. N. (1993). Thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory Into Practice. 3(2), 147-153
• Torney-Purta, J. (2001). What adolescents know about citizenship and democracy. Educational Leadership, 59(4), 45-50.
• Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, H., Oswald, H. & Shultz, W. (2001). Citizenship education in 28 countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age 14 years old. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
• Torney-Purta, J., Schwille, J., & Amadeo, J. (1999). Civic education across countries: Twenty- four case studies from the IEA Civic Education Project. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
• Wade, R. (2002). Beyond expanding horizons: New curriculum directions for elementary social studies. The Elementary School Journal, 103(2), 116-130.
• Wartella, E. & Knell, G. (2004). Raising a world-wise child and the power of media. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(3), 222-224.
• Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237-269.
• Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Critical perspectives on the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.