Research Article

Moving from Levels of Inquiry to the Flexible Phases of Inquiry Theory: A Literature Review of Inquiry-Based Teacher Education

Volume: 10 Number: 2 August 31, 2021
EN

Moving from Levels of Inquiry to the Flexible Phases of Inquiry Theory: A Literature Review of Inquiry-Based Teacher Education

Abstract

The purpose of our article is to examine the phases of inquiry-based learning and how to best prepare future teachers for inquiry-based teaching. While preservice teachers (PST) may leave teacher preparation with an understanding of the tenets of inquiry, their experiences in methods courses and experiences teaching in the field do not adequately prepare them to implement inquiry-based learning in classroom instruction. Part of this problem of practice relates to how the process of inquiry is ill-defined and muddy (Authors, 2020). To investigate this problem of practice, we use a literature review methodology in order to examine and compare how teacher candidates are prepared with inquiry-based methods. We used Banchi and Bell’s (2008) Levels of Inquiry as a lens for reporting on different levels of inquiry-based preparation of teacher candidates. This lens was informative, though ultimately too restricting. We found that the types and degrees of inquiry-based teacher preparation vary greatly from context to context. This variation inspired our design of the Flexible Phases of Inquiry model. The Flexible Phases of Inquiry Theory is a framework to support educators’ understanding of how the levels of inquiry are not fixed, but rather overlapping and dynamic.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807-830). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  2. Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26-29. http://www.nsta.org/publications/browse_journals.aspx?action=issue&id=10.2505/3/sc08_046_02
  3. Betts, P., McLarty, M., & Dickson, K. (2017). An action research project by teacher candidates and their instructor into using math inquiry: Learning about relations between theory and practice. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 19(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1011
  4. Biggers, M., & Forbes T. C. (2012). Balancing teacher and student roles in elementary classrooms: Preservice elementary teachers‟ learning about the inquiry continuum. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2205-2229.
  5. Blumenreich, M. (2012). Urban teacher candidates discover inquiry-based learning while developing oral history projects. I. E. Inquiry in Education Journal, 3(1). Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.nl.edu/ie/vol3/iss1/3
  6. Cartwright, T., Smith, S., & Hallar, B. (2014). Confronting barriers to teaching elementary science: After-school science teaching experiences for preservice teachers. Teacher Education & Practice, 27(2), 464-487. http://rowman.com/Page/Journals
  7. Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  8. Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 93(4), 745-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20311

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Studies on Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 31, 2021

Submission Date

February 9, 2021

Acceptance Date

August 29, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 10 Number: 2

APA
Bacak, J., & Byker, E. (2021). Moving from Levels of Inquiry to the Flexible Phases of Inquiry Theory: A Literature Review of Inquiry-Based Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 10(2), 255-271. https://izlik.org/JA92EA64MP