Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2020, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 93 - 104, 20.11.2020
https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2020.0018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Agresti, A., (1996). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons,Inc, USA.
  • Agresti, A., (2002). Categorical data analysis, second edition, John Wiley & Sons,Inc, USA.
  • Arıcıgil Çilan, Ç., (2009). Sosyal bilimlerde kategorik verilerle ilişki analizi, Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
  • Canpolat, Önder, (2001). E-Ticaret ve Türkiye’deki gelişmeler, T.C. Sanayi ve Ticaret Bakanlığı Hukuk Müşavirliği.
  • Kalaycı, C. (2013). Dijital bölünme, dijital yoksulluk ve uluslararası ticaret. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi,27(3), 145-162.
  • Kılıç, Ç. (2011). Küreselleşen dünyada dijital bölünme sorunu. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 81-91
  • Donna L. Hoffman, Thomas P. Novak, (1998). Bridging the Racial Divide on the Internet. Science, 280(5362), 390-391.
  • Eric Tsetsi & Stephen A. Rains, (2017). Smartphone internet access and use: Extending the digital divide and usage gap. Mobile Media & Communication,5(3), 239–255
  • Hargittai, E. (2003). The Digital Divide and What to Do about it?, New Economy Hand Book, Chapter 35, Elsevier Science USA.
  • Keniston, K., & Kumar, D. (2003). The four digital divides, In Press at Sage Publishers
  • Jan A.G.M. van Dijk, (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings, Poetics, 34(4-5), 221–235.
  • Marı ́a Rosalı ́a Vicente Cuervo & Ana Jesu ́s Lo ́pez Mene ́ndez (2006). A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: evidence for the european union-15. Information & Management, 43(6), 756-766.
  • Menzie D. Chinn Robert W. Fairlie, (2007). The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration. Oxford Economic Papers,59(1) 16-44.
  • Dragulanescu, N. G. (2002). Social impact of the “Digital Divide” in a Central–Eastern European country. The International Information & Library Review,34(2), 139-151.
  • OECD, (2007) Understanding the Digital Divide, https://www.oecd.org/sti/1888451.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 11.07.2017, 1-32.
  • Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2007). Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata. Social Science Research, 36(3), 1135-1155.
  • Brandtzæg, P. B., Heim, J., & Karahasanović, A. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide—A typology of Internet users in Europe. International journal of human-computer studies, 69(3), 123-138.
  • Cohendet, P. (2003). The digital divide in the European enlarged economic scenario: an assessment of the socio-economic effects. Strasbourg: University Louis Pasteur.
  • Friemel, T. N. (2014) The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313-331.
  • Kennedy, T., Wellman, B., & Klement, K. (2003). Gendering the digital divide. IT & society,1(5), 72-9

Measuring Digital Divide in E-Commerce by Log-Linear Models and Non-Parametric Tests: An Application of Turkey

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 93 - 104, 20.11.2020
https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2020.0018

Öz

The purpose of the study is to examine the relationships between individuals who engage in e-commerce and their demographic factors and to investigate whether their status of e-commerce engagement differentiates according to demographic factors. In case of differences, demographic factors caused by the Digital Divide were examined. If Digital Division is not detected, the reasons for this are emphasized. For this purpose, the overall profile of the customer group engaged in e-commerce in Turkey was summarized, and the demographic variables that e-commerce is associated with were determined using Non-Parametric techniques. Then, utilizing the Log-Linear Models, one of the methods of the Advanced Contingency Table Analysis, the effects including two-way and three-way interactions were investigated. Consequently, among those who engage in e-commerce in Turkey, it was determined that education caused the digital divide, however, gender remained ineffective.

Kaynakça

  • Agresti, A., (1996). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons,Inc, USA.
  • Agresti, A., (2002). Categorical data analysis, second edition, John Wiley & Sons,Inc, USA.
  • Arıcıgil Çilan, Ç., (2009). Sosyal bilimlerde kategorik verilerle ilişki analizi, Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
  • Canpolat, Önder, (2001). E-Ticaret ve Türkiye’deki gelişmeler, T.C. Sanayi ve Ticaret Bakanlığı Hukuk Müşavirliği.
  • Kalaycı, C. (2013). Dijital bölünme, dijital yoksulluk ve uluslararası ticaret. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi,27(3), 145-162.
  • Kılıç, Ç. (2011). Küreselleşen dünyada dijital bölünme sorunu. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 81-91
  • Donna L. Hoffman, Thomas P. Novak, (1998). Bridging the Racial Divide on the Internet. Science, 280(5362), 390-391.
  • Eric Tsetsi & Stephen A. Rains, (2017). Smartphone internet access and use: Extending the digital divide and usage gap. Mobile Media & Communication,5(3), 239–255
  • Hargittai, E. (2003). The Digital Divide and What to Do about it?, New Economy Hand Book, Chapter 35, Elsevier Science USA.
  • Keniston, K., & Kumar, D. (2003). The four digital divides, In Press at Sage Publishers
  • Jan A.G.M. van Dijk, (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings, Poetics, 34(4-5), 221–235.
  • Marı ́a Rosalı ́a Vicente Cuervo & Ana Jesu ́s Lo ́pez Mene ́ndez (2006). A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: evidence for the european union-15. Information & Management, 43(6), 756-766.
  • Menzie D. Chinn Robert W. Fairlie, (2007). The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration. Oxford Economic Papers,59(1) 16-44.
  • Dragulanescu, N. G. (2002). Social impact of the “Digital Divide” in a Central–Eastern European country. The International Information & Library Review,34(2), 139-151.
  • OECD, (2007) Understanding the Digital Divide, https://www.oecd.org/sti/1888451.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 11.07.2017, 1-32.
  • Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2007). Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata. Social Science Research, 36(3), 1135-1155.
  • Brandtzæg, P. B., Heim, J., & Karahasanović, A. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide—A typology of Internet users in Europe. International journal of human-computer studies, 69(3), 123-138.
  • Cohendet, P. (2003). The digital divide in the European enlarged economic scenario: an assessment of the socio-economic effects. Strasbourg: University Louis Pasteur.
  • Friemel, T. N. (2014) The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313-331.
  • Kennedy, T., Wellman, B., & Klement, K. (2003). Gendering the digital divide. IT & society,1(5), 72-9
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Sultan Kuzu Yıldırım Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-6577-1584

Çiğdem Arıcıgil Çilan Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-7862-7028

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Kasım 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Temmuz 2020
Kabul Tarihi 6 Ekim 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Kuzu Yıldırım, S., & Arıcıgil Çilan, Ç. (2020). Measuring Digital Divide in E-Commerce by Log-Linear Models and Non-Parametric Tests: An Application of Turkey. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 5(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2020.0018
AMA Kuzu Yıldırım S, Arıcıgil Çilan Ç. Measuring Digital Divide in E-Commerce by Log-Linear Models and Non-Parametric Tests: An Application of Turkey. JTL. Kasım 2020;5(2):93-104. doi:10.26650/JTL.2020.0018
Chicago Kuzu Yıldırım, Sultan, ve Çiğdem Arıcıgil Çilan. “Measuring Digital Divide in E-Commerce by Log-Linear Models and Non-Parametric Tests: An Application of Turkey”. Journal of Transportation and Logistics 5, sy. 2 (Kasım 2020): 93-104. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2020.0018.
EndNote Kuzu Yıldırım S, Arıcıgil Çilan Ç (01 Kasım 2020) Measuring Digital Divide in E-Commerce by Log-Linear Models and Non-Parametric Tests: An Application of Turkey. Journal of Transportation and Logistics 5 2 93–104.
IEEE S. Kuzu Yıldırım ve Ç. Arıcıgil Çilan, “Measuring Digital Divide in E-Commerce by Log-Linear Models and Non-Parametric Tests: An Application of Turkey”, JTL, c. 5, sy. 2, ss. 93–104, 2020, doi: 10.26650/JTL.2020.0018.
ISNAD Kuzu Yıldırım, Sultan - Arıcıgil Çilan, Çiğdem. “Measuring Digital Divide in E-Commerce by Log-Linear Models and Non-Parametric Tests: An Application of Turkey”. Journal of Transportation and Logistics 5/2 (Kasım 2020), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2020.0018.
JAMA Kuzu Yıldırım S, Arıcıgil Çilan Ç. Measuring Digital Divide in E-Commerce by Log-Linear Models and Non-Parametric Tests: An Application of Turkey. JTL. 2020;5:93–104.
MLA Kuzu Yıldırım, Sultan ve Çiğdem Arıcıgil Çilan. “Measuring Digital Divide in E-Commerce by Log-Linear Models and Non-Parametric Tests: An Application of Turkey”. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, c. 5, sy. 2, 2020, ss. 93-104, doi:10.26650/JTL.2020.0018.
Vancouver Kuzu Yıldırım S, Arıcıgil Çilan Ç. Measuring Digital Divide in E-Commerce by Log-Linear Models and Non-Parametric Tests: An Application of Turkey. JTL. 2020;5(2):93-104.



The JTL is being published twice (in April and October of) a year, as an official international peer-reviewed journal of the School of Transportation and Logistics at Istanbul University.