Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 115 - 124, 30.06.2018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • [1] E. İMREN, Selection of Optimal Establishment Place Using AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process):An Aplication of Furniture Industry, 2016. [2] J. Yang, An AHP Decision Model for Facility Location SelectionAn AHP Decision Model for Facility Location Selection, 2018. [3] C.L.Yang, Location Selection Based on AHP/ANP Approach, 2008. [4] M. B. REGMI, Application og Analytic Hierarchy Process for Location Analysis of Logistics Center in Laos, 2012. [5] B. SENNAROĞLU, A Military Airport Location Selection by AHP İntegrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR Methods, 2018. [6] D. Chatterjee, Potential Hospital Location Selectio Using AHP: A Study in Rural India, 2013. [7] T. C. Lirn, An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective, 2004. [8] C. Ugboma, An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach to Port Selevtion Decisions-Empirical Evidence from Nigerian Ports, 2006. [9] J. S. L. Lam, A Decision Support System for Port Selection. [10] C.-C. Chou, AHP Model for The Conteiner Port Choice In The Multiple-Ports Region, 2010. [11] D. Yong, Plant Location Selection Based On Fuzzy TOPSIS, 2006. [12] S. Mousavi, Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Plant Location Selection:An İntegrated Delphi-AHPPROMETHEE Methodology, 2012. [13] B. Vahdani, Plant Location Selection by Using a Three-Step Methodology:Delphi-AHP-VIKOR, 2013. [14] S. Gothwal, Plant Location Selection of A Manufacturing Industry Using AHP Approach, 2015. [15] D.Sriniketha, Plant Location Selection byUsing MCDM Methods, 2014. [16] A. Kaboli, A New Method for Plant Location Selection Problem: A Fuzzy-AHP Approch, 2007.

CHOOSING THE BEST PORT ALTERNATIVE FOR CRUISE SHIPS

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 115 - 124, 30.06.2018

Öz

Recently, the number of people who want to prefer cruise rather than holiday camp or holiday village have been increasing. There are some reasons why many people think about like this such as discovering different places in limited time and having much more options. In addition to this, thanks to increasing the usage of internet and many advertisement, many people want to visit different places. That is why, tour companies provide their customers with many options like cruise in summer time. Between these options, one of the most important decisive point is port of call. Port options are Antalya, Istanbul and Bodrum. In this paper, it will be analyzed that which port will be more preferable than others. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) which is multi-criteria decision making methods are employed in the study. Weights of criteria are calculated with AHP method is used in the ordering of alternatives. According to the obtained results, social and touristic opportunity is determined to be the most significant criterion in port selection. Bodrum is the most preferred cruise by the people participated in the study

Kaynakça

  • [1] E. İMREN, Selection of Optimal Establishment Place Using AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process):An Aplication of Furniture Industry, 2016. [2] J. Yang, An AHP Decision Model for Facility Location SelectionAn AHP Decision Model for Facility Location Selection, 2018. [3] C.L.Yang, Location Selection Based on AHP/ANP Approach, 2008. [4] M. B. REGMI, Application og Analytic Hierarchy Process for Location Analysis of Logistics Center in Laos, 2012. [5] B. SENNAROĞLU, A Military Airport Location Selection by AHP İntegrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR Methods, 2018. [6] D. Chatterjee, Potential Hospital Location Selectio Using AHP: A Study in Rural India, 2013. [7] T. C. Lirn, An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective, 2004. [8] C. Ugboma, An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach to Port Selevtion Decisions-Empirical Evidence from Nigerian Ports, 2006. [9] J. S. L. Lam, A Decision Support System for Port Selection. [10] C.-C. Chou, AHP Model for The Conteiner Port Choice In The Multiple-Ports Region, 2010. [11] D. Yong, Plant Location Selection Based On Fuzzy TOPSIS, 2006. [12] S. Mousavi, Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Plant Location Selection:An İntegrated Delphi-AHPPROMETHEE Methodology, 2012. [13] B. Vahdani, Plant Location Selection by Using a Three-Step Methodology:Delphi-AHP-VIKOR, 2013. [14] S. Gothwal, Plant Location Selection of A Manufacturing Industry Using AHP Approach, 2015. [15] D.Sriniketha, Plant Location Selection byUsing MCDM Methods, 2014. [16] A. Kaboli, A New Method for Plant Location Selection Problem: A Fuzzy-AHP Approch, 2007.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Arman Yüksel Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Nisan 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Yüksel, A. (2018). CHOOSING THE BEST PORT ALTERNATIVE FOR CRUISE SHIPS. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 2(1), 115-124.
AMA Yüksel A. CHOOSING THE BEST PORT ALTERNATIVE FOR CRUISE SHIPS. JTOM. Haziran 2018;2(1):115-124.
Chicago Yüksel, Arman. “CHOOSING THE BEST PORT ALTERNATIVE FOR CRUISE SHIPS”. Journal of Turkish Operations Management 2, sy. 1 (Haziran 2018): 115-24.
EndNote Yüksel A (01 Haziran 2018) CHOOSING THE BEST PORT ALTERNATIVE FOR CRUISE SHIPS. Journal of Turkish Operations Management 2 1 115–124.
IEEE A. Yüksel, “CHOOSING THE BEST PORT ALTERNATIVE FOR CRUISE SHIPS”, JTOM, c. 2, sy. 1, ss. 115–124, 2018.
ISNAD Yüksel, Arman. “CHOOSING THE BEST PORT ALTERNATIVE FOR CRUISE SHIPS”. Journal of Turkish Operations Management 2/1 (Haziran 2018), 115-124.
JAMA Yüksel A. CHOOSING THE BEST PORT ALTERNATIVE FOR CRUISE SHIPS. JTOM. 2018;2:115–124.
MLA Yüksel, Arman. “CHOOSING THE BEST PORT ALTERNATIVE FOR CRUISE SHIPS”. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, c. 2, sy. 1, 2018, ss. 115-24.
Vancouver Yüksel A. CHOOSING THE BEST PORT ALTERNATIVE FOR CRUISE SHIPS. JTOM. 2018;2(1):115-24.

2229319697  logo   logo-minik.png 200311739617396