Engelleri Aşmak ve Fırsatları Yakalamak: İstanbul'da Kadın Girişimciler (2018–2023)

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 223 - 242, 28.06.2025

Sibel Akyıldız

https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v26i1.524

Öz

Kadın girişimciliği ve onu destekleyen kamu ve özel sektör mekanizmaları, ekonomiyi canlandırmak, iş dünyasında çeşitliliği artırmak ve toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliğini sağlamakta önemli bir rol oynar. Ancak, bu avantajlara rağmen kadın girişimcilik birçok ekonomik ve toplumsal kırılganlık barındırmaktadır. Bu avantajlar ve kırılganlıklar, kadınlar için girişimciliği cazip veya itici faktörler haline getirmektedir. İstanbul’daki kadın girişimciler üzerine odaklanan bu çalışma, 2018-2023 yılları arasında kadın girişimciliğindeki fırsat ve engelleri inceler. İstanbul Kadıköy ilçesinde, 34-58 yaşları arasındaki 13 kadın girişimci ile 2018 yılında yapılan derinlemesine görüşmeler, aynı kişilerle 2023’te tekrarlanarak deneyimlerinin karşılaştırmalı bir analizi yapılmıştır. Danışmanlık, servis sektörü ve sigorta gibi alanlarda mikro veya küçük işletme sahibi olan bu kadınların deneyimleri üzerinden girişimciliğin avantaj ve dezavantajları, ev içi işler ve mekan ile kurdukları ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Bulgular, kadın girişimciliğinin kadınları güçlendirdiğini ve istihdamı artırdığını; ancak siyasal ve ekonomik gelişmelerden en fazla etkilenen kırılgan bir alan olarak kaldığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kadın girişimciliği , girişimci kadınlar , engeller , fırsatlar

Gender, Space, and Women’s Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in Kadıköy, İstanbul (2018–2023)

Öz

This study explores the evolving dynamics of women’s entrepreneurship in Kadıköy, Istanbul between 2018 and 2023, focusing on how structural inequalities, spatial context, and socio-economic crises shape women’s entrepreneurial trajectories. Based on two rounds of in-depth interviews with thirteen women entrepreneurs, the research highlights the persistent challenges posed by limited institutional support, gendered expectations, and economic volatility, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent inflationary period. While entrepreneurship is often framed as a pathway to empowerment, the findings show that it simultaneously reproduces precarity through unpaid care responsibilities, gendered moral norms, and spatially contingent access to opportunities. Women’s strategies of resilience such as resource-sharing and adapting business models, reflect individual ingenuity, but also reveal the lack of systemic support for gender-equitable entrepreneurship. The study emphasizes the importance of intersectional and place-based approaches to understanding how gender, class, and space interact to shape entrepreneurial agency in neoliberal and patriarchal contexts.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Women’s entrepreneurship , gender , space , women entrepreneurs in Türkiye , COVID-19

Kaynakça

• Akçay, Ü. (2022). Economic Challenges in Turkey: A Political and Social Overview. Journal of Contemporary Economics, 13(2), p. 93.
• Altınay, A. G. (2014). Gendered Productions of Space: Women Entrepreneurs in Urban Nightlife Economies. In S. B. Arat (Ed.), Gender and Politics in Turkey (pp. 202–214). Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Benería, L. (2021). Gender, Development, and Globalization: Economics as if All People Mattered. London and New York: Routledge, p. 113.
• Bora, A. (2012). Kadınların Sınıfı: Yeni Türkiye’de Kadın Emeği. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, p. 57.
• Boserup, E. (2020). Women’s Role in Economic Development. London: Earthscan, p. 210.
• Brush, C. G. (2009). Women Entrepreneurs: An Annotated Bibliography. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Brush, C., Greene, P. G., Balachandra, L., & Davis, A. (2019). The gender gap in venture capital—Progress, problems, and perspectives. Venture Capital, 21(2–3), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2019.1580311
• Carter, S., & Shaw, E. (2006). Women's Business Ownership: Recent Research and Policy Developments. London: DTI Small Business Service.
• Carter, S., Shaw, E., Lam, W., & Wilson, F. (2015). Gender, Entrepreneurship, and Enterprise. London and New York: Routledge.
• Coşar, S., & Yeğenoğlu, M. (2011). New Grounds for Patriarchy in Turkey? Gender Policy in the Age of AKP. South European Society and Politics, 16(4), 555–573.
• Çelik, Z., & Ertürk, N. (2021). The Double Burden: Women, Work, and Domestic Responsibilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey. Gender Studies Quarterly, 29(1), p. 44.
• Diner, C., & Toktaş, Ş. (2010). Waves of Feminism in Turkey: Kemalist, Islamist, and Kurdish Women's Movements in an Era of Globalization. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 12(1), 41–57.
• Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How Women Become Leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
• Ecevit, Y. (1991). Gender Segregation in the Workplace: A Case Study of Factory Workers. Social Science Journal, 10(2), p. 62.
• Ecevit, Y. (1998). The Role of Women Entrepreneurs in Economic Development. Social Science Journal, 1(1), 64–66.
• Ecevit, Y. (2007). Women’s Entrepreneurship Policies and Social Development. Social Science Journal, 10(2), 1–15.
• Ecevit, Y. (2010). Women in the Turkish Labor Market and Entrepreneurial Policies. Social Research, 14(3), 121–123.
• Ecevit, Y., & Kaptanoğlu, G. (2015). Women and Economic Participation in Turkey. Social Science Journal, 22(3), 33–48.
• Eddleston, K. A., & Powell, G. N. (2008). The role of gender identity in explaining sex differences in business owners’ career satisfier preferences. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4), p. 542.
• Elson, D. (1999). Labor markets as gendered institutions: Equality, efficiency, and empowerment issues. World Development, 27(3), pp. 611–627.
• European Commission. (2008). Women Innovators and Entrepreneurship Report. Brussels: European Commission.
• European Commission. (2019). Women in Entrepreneurship in Europe. Brussels: European Union, p.12.
• Garanti Bank. (2010). Microcredit Initiatives for Women. Istanbul: Garanti Bank Publications, p.19
• Gökarıksel, B., & Secor, A. (2017). "Post-secular Geographies and the Problem of Feminism." Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 24(2), 262–268. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1329605
• Hartmann, H. (1990). The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union. In L. Sargent (Ed.), Capitalism and the State (pp. 137–156). London: Verso.
• Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home. New York: Penguin Books. p. 35.
• Hughes, K. D. (2003). Women’s Motivations for Entrepreneurship in North America. Gender, Work & Organization, 10(4), pp. 435-436.
• KAGİDER (2023). Kadın Girişimciliği Ekosistemi Raporu. İstanbul: Kadın Girişimciler Derneği.Available at: https://kagider.org
• Kabeer, N. (2015). Gender Equality and Economic Growth: Policy Frameworks for Development. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 211, 215.
• Kabeer, N. (2020). Economic Justice for Women in a Globalizing World. London and New York: Routledge. p. 15.
• Kalaycıoğlu, S., & Keyman, F. (2021). Economic and Social Shifts in Turkey: Post-Pandemic Realities. Turkish Social Sciences Review, 15(3), p. 124.
• Kandiyoti, D. (2016). Locating the Politics of Gender: Patriarchy, Neoliberalism and Post-coloniality in Turkey. Research Reports. London School of Economics, pp. 18–19.
• Kelley, D. J., Singer, S., & Herrington, M. (2023). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2022/2023 Global Report. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association. Available at: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report
• KOSGEB (2023). Kadın Girişimciliği Destek Programı Raporu. Ankara: KOSGEB. Available at: https://www.kosgeb.gov.tr/site/tr/genel/detay/7572/kadin-girisimcilik-destek-programi (accessed 20 August 2024).
• Kutanis, R.Ö. and Alparslan, S. (2006) Are Profiles of Women Entrepreneurs and Managers Different? Afyon Kocatepe University, Journal of IIBF, 8, 139-153.
• Ley, D. (2009). Sites of resistance: Gender and the negotiation of urban space. Urban Studies, 46(1), 935–950.
• Lingam, L. (2005). Structural Adjustment Programs and Women’s Employment. Gender, Technology and Development, 9(1), p. 1.
• Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, p. 82.
• Mayoux, L. (2001). Tackling the down side: Social capital, women's empowerment, and micro-finance in Cameroon. Development and Change, 32(3), 435–464.
• Memiş, E., Öneş, U., and Kızılırmak, B. (2012) “Housewifisation of Women:Contextualisation Gendered Patterns of Paid and Unpaid Work” in S. Dedeoğlu ve A. Yavuz Elveren (Eds.) Gender and Society in Turkey: The Impact of Neo-Liberal Policies, Political Islam and Eu Accession, IB Tauris, London and New York, pp. 87-102.
• Meta-Analysis of Gender and Science Research (2010). European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/gendered_innovations/index_en.cfm, (accessed 20 August 2024).
• OECD (2004). Conference on Small and Medium Enterprises: Istanbul Declaration. Available at: https://www.oecd.org, (accessed 20 August 2024).
• Power, K. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has increased gender inequality. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, p. 17.
• Prizzia, R. (2005). The Social Implications of Privatization. Journal of Public Affairs, 5(1), p. 56.
• Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
• Sayın, S. (2011). Gender, Education, and Economic Participation: A Study on Women Entrepreneurs in Turkey. Gender Studies Review, 5(2), p. 89.
• Sherry, J., Cueva, H., & Allen, L. (2012). Community spaces and relational ties in women’s entrepreneurship. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 40(3/4), p 89.
• Smith, J., & Brown, A. (2020). Women’s Entrepreneurship: Global Trends and Local Impacts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Soysal, S. (2010). Barriers to Women’s Entrepreneurship in Turkey. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 11(2), p. 123.
• TOBB (2007). Programs for Women Entrepreneurs. Available at: https://www.tobb.org.tr, (accessed 20 August 2024).
• Toksöz, G. (2012). The State and Female Labor: Gender, Employment and Social Policy in Contemporary Turkey. Feminist Review, 98(1), 110–127.
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) (2017). Labor Force Statistics. Available at: https://data.tuik.gov.tr, (accessed 20 August 2024)
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) (2023). Girişimcilik ve İşgücü İstatistikleri. Available at: https://data.tuik.gov.tr
• Türkten, H., & Demiryürek, O. (2016). Invisible Potential: Women's Entrepreneurship in Turkey. International Journal of Social Policy, 15(1), pp.25-40.
• UN Women. (2022). Facts and figures: Women and the economy. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/in-focus/csw61/women-and-the-economy Williams, J., & Boushey, H. (2020). Work-Life Boundaries in the Gig Economy: Implications for Social and Economic Policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(1), p. 78.
• World Bank. (2021). COVID-19 and Economic Impact on Women in Emerging Markets. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
• Yetim, N. (2002). Women’s Entrepreneurship and Economic Participation. Social Science Journal, 7(1), 45–58.