Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Süreç-İlişkisel Teoloji ve İslamî Feminist Düşünce: Bir Ön Araştırma

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 443 - 468, 31.12.2024

Öz

Bu makale, süreç-ilişkisel teolojinin İslami feminist teolojiye muhtemel katkılarını incelemekte ve bu tür bir etkileşimin, İslamî geleneği cinsiyet eşitliği zaviyesinden yeniden yorumlama çabalarını önemli ölçüde zenginleştirebileceğini savunmaktadır. Süreç-ilişkisel teoloji; dinamik, her şeyle bağlı/bağlantılı ve duyarlı bir Tanrıya vurgu yaparak, hâkim olan İslâm teolojisinde yer alan ilâhî-insan ilişkilerine ve cinsiyet dinamiklerine dair, güçlü ataerkil eğilimlere sahip geleneksel hiyerarşik görüşlere meydan okuyan verimli bir çerçeve sunar. Bu makalede iddia edildiği üzere, süreç düşüncesinin İslamî feminizmle entegrasyonu, İslamî feminist teolojinin söylemsel temellerini daha da güçlendirebilecek temel İslam teolojisi kavramlarına dair yeni bakış açıları ortaya koyabilir. Modern Müslüman bağlamlarda feminist düşüncenin tarihini özetledikten ve Asma Lamrabet, Sa’diyya Shaikh ve Jerusha Lamptey Tanner’ın eserlerinde İslamî feminizme yapılan son katkıları inceledikten sonra bu makale, süreç-ilişkisel teolojinin dinamik ilişkiler üzerindeki vurgusunun ve katı hiyerarşileri reddetmesinin İslami feminist söyleme nasıl yeni bakış açıları sunabileceğini irdelemektedir. Bu sentez, İslam teolojisinde ilahî-insan ilişkileri, cinsiyet dinamikleri ve dinî otorite konularında daha cinsiyet eşitlikçi anlayışlar geliştirmeyi, potansiyel olarak İslamî feminizmin ve İslam feminist teolojisinin metafiziksel ve teolojik temellerini genişletmeyi ve diyalog için yeni yollar açmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Teşekkür

As per our emailing exchanges and editorial office suggestion I did not use the correct template which in case the article gets published can be done later.

Kaynakça

  • Akbar, A., & Saeed, A. (2022). A critique of the concept of Ḥākimiyya: Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd’s approach. Religions, 13(11), 1100.
  • Alak, A., Duderija, A., & Hissong, K. (2020). Islam and gender: Major issues and debates. Routledge.
  • Ayubi, Z. (2019). Gendered morality: Classical Islamic ethics of the self, family and society. Columbia University Press.
  • Barlas, A. (2002). “Believing women” in Islam: Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qurʾan. University of Texas Press.
  • Bauer, K. (2015). Gender hierarchy in the Qur’an: Medieval interpretations, modern responses*. Cambridge University Press.
  • Chaudhry, A. (2013). Domestic violence and the Islamic tradition: Ethics, law, and the Muslim discourse on gender. Oxford University Press.
  • Cobb, J., & Griffin, D. R. (1976). Process theology: An introductory exposition (Revised ed.). Westminster John Knox Press.
  • Duderija, A. (2011). Constructing a religiously ideal “believer” and “woman” in Islam: Neo-traditional Salafi and progressive Muslim methods of interpretation (Manahij). Palgrave.
  • Duderija, A. (2014). Maqasid al-shar n-Sunna hermeneutics and the reformation of Muslim family law. In Duderija, A. (Ed.), Maqasid Al Shari’ah and contemporary Muslim reformist thought (pp. 193-218). Palgrave.
  • Duderija, A. (2017). The imperatives of progressive Islam. Routledge.
  • Duderija, A. (2020). Contemporary Muslim male reformist thought and gender equality: Affirmative interpretations of Islam. Feminist Theology, 28(2), 161-181.
  • Epperly, B. (2011). Process theology: A guide for the perplexed. Continuum. Haqqani, S. (2024). The gendered non-negotiables: Islam, gender, and change Oneworld.
  • Hidayatullah, A. (2014). Feminist edges of the Qur’an. Oxford University Press.
  • Hartshorne, C. (1984). Omnipotence and other theological mistakes. State University of New York Press.
  • Lamrabet, A. (2018). Men and women in the Qur’an. Palgrave.
  • Mesle, C. R. (2008). Process-relational philosophy: An introduction to Alfred North
  • Whitehead. Templeton Foundation Press.
  • Mir Hosseini, Z., Larsen, L., Moe, C., & Vogt, K. (Eds.). (2013). New ideas, new prospects in gender equality and Muslim family law: Justice and ethics in Islamic legal tradition. I.B. Tauris.
  • Sachedina, A. (2008). Islam and the challenge of human rights. Oxford University Press.
  • Sia, S. (1985). God in process thought: A study in Charles Hartshorne’s concept of God. Kluwer.
  • Shaikh, S. (2004). Knowledge, women and gender in the Hadith. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 15(1), 99-108.
  • Shaikh, S. (2012). Sufi narratives of intimacy: Ibn ‘Arabi, gender and sexuality. University of North Carolina Press.
  • Sirri, L. (2021). Islamic feminism: Discourse on gender and sexuality in contemporary Islam. Routledge.
  • Yachoulti, M. (2023). New Islamic feminist voices in Morocco: The case of Asma Lamrabet. Journal of Africana Gender Studies, 1(1 & 2), 161-176.
  • Wadud, a. (1992). Qur’an and Woman : Re-Reading the Sacred Text from a Woman’s Perspective. Oxford University Press.

Process Relational Theology and Islamic Feminist Thought: An Initial Exploration

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 443 - 468, 31.12.2024

Öz

This article examines the potential contributions of process relational theology to Islamic feminist theology, arguing that such an engagement can significantly enrich existing efforts to reinterpret Islamic tradition through a gender-justice lens. Process relational theology, by emphasising a dynamic, interconnected, and responsive God, offers a fertile framework that challenges traditional hierarchical views of divine-human relationships and gender dynamics found in mainstream Islamic theology that have strong patriarchal tendencies. The article suggests that integrating process thought into Islamic feminism can provide fresh perspectives on key Islamic theological concepts that can further fortify the discursive foundations of Islamic feminist theology. After outlining the history of feminist thought in modern Muslim contexts and reviewing recent contributions to Islamic feminism in the works of Asma Lamrabet, Sa’diyya Shaikh and Jerusha Lamptey Tanner, the article explores how process relational theology’s emphasis on dynamic relationships and rejection of rigid hierarchies can offer new insights into Islamic feminist discourse. This integration aims to develop more gender egalitarian understandings of divine-human relationships, gender dynamics, and religious authority in Islamic theology, potentially expanding the metaphysical and theological foundations of Islamic feminism and Islamic feminist theology and opening new avenues for dialogue.

Kaynakça

  • Akbar, A., & Saeed, A. (2022). A critique of the concept of Ḥākimiyya: Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd’s approach. Religions, 13(11), 1100.
  • Alak, A., Duderija, A., & Hissong, K. (2020). Islam and gender: Major issues and debates. Routledge.
  • Ayubi, Z. (2019). Gendered morality: Classical Islamic ethics of the self, family and society. Columbia University Press.
  • Barlas, A. (2002). “Believing women” in Islam: Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qurʾan. University of Texas Press.
  • Bauer, K. (2015). Gender hierarchy in the Qur’an: Medieval interpretations, modern responses*. Cambridge University Press.
  • Chaudhry, A. (2013). Domestic violence and the Islamic tradition: Ethics, law, and the Muslim discourse on gender. Oxford University Press.
  • Cobb, J., & Griffin, D. R. (1976). Process theology: An introductory exposition (Revised ed.). Westminster John Knox Press.
  • Duderija, A. (2011). Constructing a religiously ideal “believer” and “woman” in Islam: Neo-traditional Salafi and progressive Muslim methods of interpretation (Manahij). Palgrave.
  • Duderija, A. (2014). Maqasid al-shar n-Sunna hermeneutics and the reformation of Muslim family law. In Duderija, A. (Ed.), Maqasid Al Shari’ah and contemporary Muslim reformist thought (pp. 193-218). Palgrave.
  • Duderija, A. (2017). The imperatives of progressive Islam. Routledge.
  • Duderija, A. (2020). Contemporary Muslim male reformist thought and gender equality: Affirmative interpretations of Islam. Feminist Theology, 28(2), 161-181.
  • Epperly, B. (2011). Process theology: A guide for the perplexed. Continuum. Haqqani, S. (2024). The gendered non-negotiables: Islam, gender, and change Oneworld.
  • Hidayatullah, A. (2014). Feminist edges of the Qur’an. Oxford University Press.
  • Hartshorne, C. (1984). Omnipotence and other theological mistakes. State University of New York Press.
  • Lamrabet, A. (2018). Men and women in the Qur’an. Palgrave.
  • Mesle, C. R. (2008). Process-relational philosophy: An introduction to Alfred North
  • Whitehead. Templeton Foundation Press.
  • Mir Hosseini, Z., Larsen, L., Moe, C., & Vogt, K. (Eds.). (2013). New ideas, new prospects in gender equality and Muslim family law: Justice and ethics in Islamic legal tradition. I.B. Tauris.
  • Sachedina, A. (2008). Islam and the challenge of human rights. Oxford University Press.
  • Sia, S. (1985). God in process thought: A study in Charles Hartshorne’s concept of God. Kluwer.
  • Shaikh, S. (2004). Knowledge, women and gender in the Hadith. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 15(1), 99-108.
  • Shaikh, S. (2012). Sufi narratives of intimacy: Ibn ‘Arabi, gender and sexuality. University of North Carolina Press.
  • Sirri, L. (2021). Islamic feminism: Discourse on gender and sexuality in contemporary Islam. Routledge.
  • Yachoulti, M. (2023). New Islamic feminist voices in Morocco: The case of Asma Lamrabet. Journal of Africana Gender Studies, 1(1 & 2), 161-176.
  • Wadud, a. (1992). Qur’an and Woman : Re-Reading the Sacred Text from a Woman’s Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Kadın Araştırmaları, Sosyoloji (Diğer)
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Adis Duderija 0000-0001-8134-761X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Ekim 2024
Kabul Tarihi 18 Kasım 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Duderija, A. (2024). Process Relational Theology and Islamic Feminist Thought: An Initial Exploration. KADEM Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(2), 443-468.