Öz
The issue of whether following others in faith or imitation is valid in religion has been a hot debate among Muslim theologians or Mutakillimûn technically speaking. In spite of the fact that they criticized this imitation, they never labeled the people who were tarred with this brush as “heathens or infidels.” Of course the lifestyle of the Prophet, who never acted this way, was a model for these scholars. Abu’l-Muîn an-Nasafî discusses the topic in his Tabsira and gave no any credit to this kind of faith; however, he did not nullify its validity, as the core of the faith is confirmation in his thought. And its opposite is denial. So every single one who declares himself as believer is considered believer irrespective of their faith being inductive/istidlâlî. Qadî Abd al-Jabbâr was much more harsh in evaluating the relation between knowledge and faith. Imitation in faith is a kind of ignorance, to him, and has no any validity
Anahtar Kelimeler
Imitation in faith validity of faith relationship between faith and knowledge Qâdi Abd al-Jabbâr Abu’l-Muîn an-Nasafî
Kaynakça
- Abdulcebbâr, Kâdî, el-Muğnî fî Ebvâbi’t-Tevhîd ve’l-Adl, XII (en-Nazar ve’l-Meârif), (tah. İbrâhim Medkûr-Tâhâ Hüseyin), Kâhire 1962. ---Şerhu’l-Usûli’l-Hamse, thk. Abdulkerim Osman, (neş. Mektebetu’l-Vehbe), Kâhire 1988. ---el-Muhtasar fî Usûli’d-Dîn, (Resâilü’l-Adl ve’t-Tevhîd/I içinde), (tah.
- Muhammed Ammâra), Kâhire 1971.
- Ahmed Saim Kılavuz, İman-Küfür Sınırı, İstanbul 1982.
- Akkuş, Süleyman “Ebu’l-Muîn en-Nesefi’ye göre Taklidin İnanç Boyutu”, S.Ü.İ.F.D., 18/200 ---“Ebu’l-Muîn en-Nesefî’ye göre Mahiyet, Artma ve Azalma Yönüyle İman”, S.Ü.İ.F.D. 15/2007.
- Ali el-Kârî, Ebu’l-Hasan Nûreddîn Ali b. Sultan Muhammed, Şerhu’l-Fıkhi’l-Ekber, Beyrut 19 Bağdadî, Ebû Bekr el-Hatîb (463/1071), el-Fakih ve’l-Mütefakkih, Riyad 1969.
- Bağdâdî, Abdulkâhir b. Tâhir b. Muhammed, Usuli’d-Din, Beyrut 1981.
- Bakıllânî, Ebû Bekr Muhammed b. et-Tayyib, Temhidü’l-Evail ve Telhisü’d-Delail (tah. İmadüddin Ahmed), Beyrut 1986.
- Cürcânî, Seyit Şerif Ali b. Muhammed , Şerhu’l-Mevâkıf, İstanbul 1311. ---Tarifat, Beyrut 1985.
- Cüveyni, İmâmu’l-Harameyn Ebi’l-Meâlî Abdilmelik, Kitabu’l-İrşad, (neş. M.Yusuf Musa-A. Abdulmünim Abdulhamid), Kahire 1950.
- Eş’arî, Ebû Hasan Ali b. İsmail, el-Lüma’ fi’r-red alâ Ehli’z-Zeyğ ve’l-bida’, (neş. R. J. Mc. Carthy), Beyrut 1953.
- Ebu Azbe, Hasan b. Abdülmuhsin, er-Ravzatü'l-Behiyye fima beyne'l-Eş’ariyye ve'l- Maturidiyye, Haydarabad 1332.
- Gazâlî, Ebû Hamîd, İhyâu ulumi’d-dîn, Beyrut 1997. ---İlcamu'l-Avam an 'İlmi'l-Kelam, el-Munkız mine 'd-Dalal içinde, İstanbul 1994.
- Harpûtî, Abdüllatif, Tenkîhu’l-Kelâm fî Akâidi Ehli’l-İslam, İstanbul 1330.
- Hayreddin Karaman, İslam Hukukunda İctihad, Ankara 1975.
- Izutsu, Toshihiko, İslam Düşüncesinde İman Kavramı (ter. Selahaddin Ayaz), İstanbul 2000.
- İbn Manzur, Ebu’l-Fadl Muhammed b. Mukerrem, Lisanu’l-Arab, Beyrut 1994.
- İbn Teymiyye, İman Üzerine, (ter. Salih Uçan), İstanbul 1985.
- İsfehâni, Ebu Kasım Ragıp, el-Mufredatu Elfâzi’l-Kur’an, (tah. Safvan Adnan Davudi), Beyrut 1997.
- Kılavuz, Ahmed Saim, Ana Hatlarıyla İslam Akaidi ve Kelama Giriş, İstanbul 1997.
- Özcan, Hanifi, Epistemolojik Açıdan İman, İstanbul 1997.
- Sâbunî, Nûreddîn, el-Bidaye fî usîli’d-dîn (ter. Bekir Topaloğlu), Ankara 1979. es-Sünevî, Ebu Muhammed Abdurrahman b. Hasan, et-Temhid Fi Tahrici’l-Furui ala’l-Usuli,
- (tah. Muhammed Hasan Hitu), Beyrut 1981.
- Şehristânî, Ebu’l-Fetih Muhammed b. Abdülkerim, Nihâyetü’l-İkdâm fi İlmi’l-Kelâm, (neş. Alfred Guillaume), London 1934.
- Şerafettin Gölcük-Süleyman Toprak, Kelam, Konya 1991.
- Taftazânî, Sadeddin (v. 792-1390), Şerhu’l-Makâsıd, Beyrut 1989.
- Ünverdi, Mustafa, İmanda Taklid ve Tahkik, (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi), Ankara 2009. ---“Klasik İslam Geleneğinde Taklidi İmanın Değeri”, Kelam Araştırmaları, 10:1, 20
Öz
The issue of whether following others in faith or imitation is valid in religion has been a hot debate among Muslim theologians or Mutakillimûn technically speaking. In spite of the fact that they criticized this imitation, they never labeled the people who were tarred with this brush as ?heathens or infidels.? Of course the lifestyle of the Prophet, who never acted this way, was a model for these scholars. Abu?l-Muîn an-Nasafî discusses the topic in his Tabsira and gave no any credit to this kind of faith; however, he did not nullify its validity, as the core of the faith is confirmation in his thought. And its opposite is denial. So every single one who declares himself as believer is considered believer irrespective of their faith being inductive/istidlâlî. Qadî Abd al-Jabbâr was much more harsh in evaluating the relation between knowledge and faith. Imitation in faith is a kind of ignorance, to him, and has no any validity.
ISSN: 1309-2030 KADER Kelam Araştırmaları Dergisi