Comparing Scenario and Semi-structured Interviews in Inclusive Education Research: Perspectives of Trainee Teachers on Addressing Children with Special Educational Needs

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 296 - 310, 31.08.2024

Oğuzhan Hazır , Turgut Anıl Karlıdağ

https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1389879

Öz

The scenario interview technique allows researchers to explore the complex and context-dependent nature of inclusive teaching practices. This study was designed using a phenomenological approach, and 14 trainee teachers volunteered to participate. The results showed that each participant expressed their own ideas according to each scenario and demonstrated their understanding of how to address and overcome the student's problem in special education. Therefore, the scenario interview data collection technique can be utilized in educational studies to gain insights into participants' perspectives, decision-making processes, interpretations of behaviour towards themselves or an organization, by using real or hypothetical events on specific topics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Inclusive Education, Scenario Interview, Semi-structured Interview, Trainee Teacher

Kaynakça

• Alatiq, A. (2020). Exploring Resistance to Change and Teacher Attitude towards Educational Change in Female Schools in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading].
• BERA (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research. (4th Edt) BERA. 20. 01.2024
• Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Van Der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795-812.
• Brose, A., Fügenschuh, A., Gausemeier, P., Vierhaus, I., & Seliger, G. (2013). A system dynamic enhancement for the scenario technique. (Report No. 13-24) Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum fur Informationstechnik Berlin. http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/serien/ah/ZIB/ZR-13-24.pdf
• Brownlee, J., Berthelsen, D., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2010). Toward self-authorship in child care students: Implications for working with children and their families. In Development and Assessment of Self-Authorship (pp. 101-115). Routledge.
• Carroll, J. M. (2000). Making use: scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. MIT press.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. Abingdon, Oxon.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage. London.
• Dunn, T. W. (2017). Inclusion of children with diverse needs in early childhood education and care services: exploring inclusive practice through self-authorship [Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology].
• Edwards, A. (2014). The professional identity of child care practitioners Self-authorship as a theoretical framework [Doctoral Thesis, Queensland University of Technology].
• Ennis, C. D., & Chen, S. (2012). Interviews and focus groups. In Research methods in physical education and youth sport (pp. 217-236). Routledge.
• Fahey, L., & Randall, R. M. (Eds.). (1997). Learning from the future: Competitive foresight scenarios. John Wiley & Sons.
• Florian, L. (2008). Inclusion: special or inclusive education: future trends. British Journal of Special Education, 35(4), 202-208.
• Fahey, L., & Randall, R. M. (Eds.). (1997). Learning from the future: Competitive foresight scenarios. John Wiley & Sons.
• Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Suny Press.
• Holden, R. J., Daley, C. N., Mickelson, R. S., Bolchini, D., Toscos, T., Cornet, V. P., ... & Mirro, M. J. (2020). Patient decision-making personas: an application of a patient-centered cognitive task analysis (P-CTA). Applied ergonomics, 87, 103107.
• Krischler, M., & Cate, I. M. (2019). Pre-and in-service teachers’ attitudes toward students with learning difficulties and challenging behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 327.
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
• Marquard, J. L., & Brennan, P. F. (2009, June). Using decision scenarios to evaluate laypeople’s computer-mediated medication information sharing choices. In 9th Bi-annual International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM9) 9 (pp. 241-248).
• Mastriopieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2010). The inclusive classroom: strategies for effective differentiated instruction.
• Millett, S. M. (2003). The future of scenarios: challenges and opportunities. Strategy & Leadership.
• Piper, S. A. (2019). Upper Elementary Teachers’ Use of Pedagogical Content Knowledge with Nonfiction Reading Instruction [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University].
• Ralph, A. (2011). ‘Pre-service teachers' interests and dispositions towards involvement in a physical education teacher education programme’, available: https://hdl.handle.net/10344/1669. 11.04.2023.
• Ramirez, R., Mukherjee, M., Vezzoli, S., & Kramer, A. M. (2015). Scenarios as a scholarly methodology to produce “interesting research”. Futures, 71, 70-87.
• Sims, W. (2011). Similarities and differences in decision-making processes and practices among elementary school principals in program improvement Year I, Year 3, and Year 5 schools. University of California, Berkeley.
• Stockero, S. L., Leatham, K. R., Ochieng, M. A., Van Zoest, L. R., & Peterson, B. E. (2020). Teachers’ orientations toward using student mathematical thinking as a resource during whole-class discussion. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(3), 237-267.