Adaptif Cepheler ve Çalışma Mekânizmalarına Göre Adaptif Cephe Sistemlerinin Örnekler Üzerinden İncelenmesi

Öz

Yapı kabuğu iç ve dış ortam arasındaki enerji akışını kontrol edebilen arayüzler olarak binaların performansının iyileştirilmesinde önemli bir role sahiptir. Geleneksel cephe sistemleri genellikle statik olarak tasarlanmakta olup değişen çevresel koşulları ve kullanıcı beklentilerini karşılamada kısmen yetersiz kalmaktadır. Buna karşılık, adaptif cepheler (AF), iklim koşulları konusunda daha esnek olup, fiziksel çevre kontrolü bağlamında geçici değişikliklere yanıt verme olanağına sahiptir. İç mekân konfor koşullarını sağlamanın yanı sıra kentsel ısı adalarının önlenmesi, hava kirliliğinin azaltılması gibi çeşitli sorunların çözümünde dış mekân konforunun iyileştirilmelisini de olumlu yönde etkileyebilmektedir. Tüm bu avantajlara rağmen uluslararası ölçekte kullanımı yaygınlaşmaya başlayan ancak Türkiye’de daha az uygulama örneğine sahip adaptif cephelerle ilgili yeterli sayıda çalışma yer almamaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı adaptif cephe kavramını detaylı bir şekilde incelemek, güncel literatür özeti sunmak, çalışma mekânizmalarına göre çeşitli adaptif cephe sistemlerini uluslararası örnekler üzerinden inceleyerek adaptif cephe sistemlerinin performansını ortaya koymaktır. Çalışma kapsamında, öncelikle adaptif mimari ve adaptif cephe kavramlarına ilişkin mevcut ve güncel ulusal ve uluslararası literatür taranarak bir literatür analizi yapılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda, adaptif cepheler çalışma mekânizmalarına göre; Hidrolik, Pnömatik, Motor tabanlı, Malzeme tabanlı ve Enerji üreten sistemler olmak üzere beş ana başlıkta sınıflandırılmıştır. Sistemler ve her bir sisteme ait ikişer olmak üzere seçilen 10 örnek bina tanıtılarak adaptif cephe özellikleri bağlamında karşılaştırılmalı incelenmiştir. Yapılan literatür analizi ve karşılaştırmalar değerlendirildiğinde, 5 adaptif sistemin farklı avantaj ve dezavantajlara sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Bazı sistemler yüksek hassasiyet, hızlı tepki, verimlilik, düşük maliyet veya çevresel katkılar sunarken, bazıları kurulum ve bakım maliyetleri, enerji tüketimi ve kullanıcı müdahalesi gibi konularda çeşitli zorluklar içermektedir. Bu çalışma, adaptif cephelerin performansını iyileştirmek için her bir sistemin avantaj ve dezavantajlarını dikkate alarak uygun sistem seçiminin önemini vurgulamayı hedeflemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Adaptif cephe
• yapı kabuğu
• çift cidarlı cephe
• enerji verimliliği
• kullanıcı konforu

Adaptive Facades and Examination of Adaptive Facade Systems According To Working Mechanisms on Examples

Öz

The building envelope, as an interface capable of controlling the energy flow between the internal and external environments, plays a crucial role in improving the performance of buildings. Traditional facade systems are generally designed to be static, and as such, they are insufficient in addressing changing environmental conditions and user expectations. In contrast, adaptive facades (AF) are more flexible in terms of climate conditions, allowing for responses to temporary changes in the physical environment. Besides ensuring indoor comfort conditions, they can also positively impact the improvement of outdoor comfort in addressing various issues such as preventing urban heat islands and reducing air pollution. Despite all these advantages, adaptive facades, which are becoming more widely used internationally, have fewer application examples in Türkiye, and there is a lack of sufficient studies on this topic. This article aims to examine the concept of adaptive facades in detail, provide an overview of current literature, and evaluate the performance of various adaptive facade systems through international examples based on their working mechanisms. Within the scope of the study, a literature analysis was conducted by reviewing existing and up-to-date national and international literature on adaptive architecture and adaptive facades. As a result of the analysis, adaptive facades were classified into five main categories based on their working mechanisms: Hydraulic, Pneumatic, Motor-based, Material-based, and Energy-producing systems. Ten example buildings, with two examples from each system, were introduced and comparatively analyzed in terms of their adaptive facade characteristics. The literature analysis and comparisons revealed that the five adaptive systems have different advantages and disadvantages. Some systems offer high precision, fast response, efficiency, low cost, or environmental benefits, while others pose challenges in terms of installation and maintenance costs, energy consumption, and user intervention. This study aims to highlight the importance of selecting appropriate systems by considering the advantages and disadvantages of each system to improve the performance of adaptive facades.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Adaptive facade
• building envelope
• double-skin facade
• energy efficiency
• user comfort

Kaynakça

1. Aelenei, D., Aelenei, L., ve Vieira, C. P. (2016). Adaptive Façade: concept, applications, research questions. Energy Procedia, 91, 269-275.
2. Alkhatib, H., Lemarchand, P., Norton, B., ve O’Sullivan, D. T. J. (2021). Deployment and control of adaptive building facades for energy generation, thermal insulation, ventilation and daylighting: A review. Applied Thermal Engineering, 185, 116331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116331
3. Andrade, T., Beirão, J., Arruda, A., ve Vinagre, N. (2024). Kinetic module in bimetal: A biomimetic approach adapting the kinetic behavior of bimetal for adaptive Façades. Materials ve Design, 239, 112807. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112807
4. Archdaily. (2024). Bund Finance Centre / Foster + Partners + Heatherwick Studio. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/881511/bund-finance-centre-foster-plus-partners-plus-heatherwick-studio
5. Architonic. (2013). BIQ HOUSE Hamburg, Germany, 2013 . https://www.architonic.com/en/project/arup-biq-house/5101636
6. Arkitektuel. (2018). Media-TIC. https://www.arkitektuel.com/media-tic/
7. Attia, S., Bilir, S., Safy, T., Struck, C., Loonen, R., ve Goia, F. (2018). Current trends and future challenges in the performance assessment of adaptive façade systems. Energy and Buildings, 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.09.017
8. Blaise, R., ve Gilles, D. (2022). Adapted strategy for large-scale assessment of solar potential on facades in urban areas focusing on the reflection component. Solar Energy Advances, 2, 100030. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seja.2022.100030

9. Bolton, W. (2015). Mechatronics: Electronic Control Systems in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering. Pearson Education.
10. Borschewski, D., Voigt, M. P., Albrecht, S., Roth, D., Kreimeyer, M., ve Leistner, P. (2023). Why are adaptive facades not widely used in practice? Identifying ecological and economical benefits with life cycle assessment. Building and Environment, 232, 110069. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110069
11. BPIE. (2023). A call for faster and bolder action (2nd ed.), .
12. Brown, T., ve White, S. (2018). Shape-Memory Alloys in Building Design. Routledge.
13. Bui, D.-K., Nguyen, T. N., Ghazlan, A., Ngo, N.-T., ve Ngo, T. D. (2020). Enhancing building energy efficiency by adaptive façade: A computational optimization approach. Applied Energy, 265, 114797. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114797
14. Catto Lucchino, E., ve Goia, F. (2023). Multi-domain model-based control of an adaptive façade based on a flexible double skin system. Energy and Buildings, 285, 112881. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112881
15. Claros-Marfil, L. J., Zetola, V., Padial, J. F., ve Lauret, B. (2022). Experimental-simulation methodology for estimation of thermal parameters of adaptive facades in mild climate conditions: A water-flow glazing case study. Journal of Building Engineering, 45, 103384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103384
16. Čurpek, J., Čekon, M., Šikula, O., ve Slávik, R. (2023). Thermodynamic responses of adaptive mechanisms in BiPV façade systems coupled with latent thermal energy storage. Energy and Buildings, 279, 112665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112665
17. Çakır Aydoğan, Ö. (2018). Ses verileri etkileşimli dinamik adaptif bir cephe önerisi Sound shıeld.
18. Doroteo, J. (2024). Let Your Building “Breathe” With This Pneumatic Façade Technology . ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/789230/let-your-building-to-breathe-with-this-pneumatic-facade-technology
19. Flor, J.-F., Liu, X., Sun, Y., Beccarelli, P., Chilton, J., ve Wu, Y. (2022). Switching daylight: Performance prediction of climate adaptive ETFE foil façades. Building and Environment, 209, 108650. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108650
20. Fowler, M. (2015). Motor Control Electronics Handbook. McGraw-Hill Education.
21. Fox, M. (2016). Interactive architecture: adaptive world. Chronicle Books.
22. Fox, M., ve Kemp, M. (2009). Interactive Architecture. Princeton Architectural Press.
23. Heidari Matin, N., ve Eydgahi, A. (2022). Technologies used in responsive facade systems: a comparative study. Intelligent buildings international, 14(1), 54-73.
24. InDeWAG. (2020). InDeWAG-Industrial Development of Water Flow Glazing Systems. European Commission| CORDIS | H2020. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/680441
25. Jones, R. (2016). Smart Glass Technologies and Applications. Springer.
26. Juaristi, M., ve Krarti, M. (2024). Review of adaptive opaque façades and laboratory tests for the dynamic thermal performance characterization. Building and Environment, 249, 111123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111123
27. Juaristi, M., Loonen, R., Isaia, F., Gómez-Acebo, T., ve Monge-Barrio, A. (2020). Dynamic Climate Analysis for early design stages: a new methodological approach to detect preferable Adaptive Opaque Façade Responses. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60, 102232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102232
28. Jumabekova, A., Berger, J., Hubert, T., Dugué, A., Vogt Wu, T., Recht, T., ve Inard, C. (2023). A state-space model to control an adaptive facade prototype using data-driven techniques. Energy and Buildings, 296, 113391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113391
29. Kolarevic, B., ve Parlac, V. (2015). Building Dynamics: Exploring Architecture of Change.
30. Koyaz, M., ve Ünlü, A. (2022). Human-centred performance criteria for adaptive façade design: Based on the results of a user experience survey. Building and Environment, 222, 109386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109386
31. Kronenburg, R. (2007). Flexible: architecture that responds to change. (No Title).
32. Le, D. M., Park, D. Y., Baek, J., Karunyasopon, P., ve Chang, S. (2022). Multi-criteria decision making for adaptive façade optimal design in varied climates: Energy, daylight, occupants’ comfort, and outdoor view analysis. Building and Environment, 223, 109479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109479
33. Lee, D., Cho, Y.-H., ve Jo, J.-H. (2021). Assessment of control strategy of adaptive façades for heating, cooling, lighting energy conservation and glare prevention. Energy and Buildings, 235, 110739. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110739
34. Loonen, R. C. G. M., Rico-Martinez, J. M., Favoino, F., Brzezicki, M., Menezo, C., La Ferla, G., ve (Laura) Aelenei, L. (2015). Design for façade adaptability: Towards a unified and systematic characterization.
35. Loonen, R. C. G. M., Trčka, M., Cóstola, D., ve Hensen, J. L. M. (2013). Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 25, 483-493.
36. Majumdar, S. R. (1996). Pneumatic systems: principles and maintenance. (No Title).
37. Majumdar, S. R. (2003). Oil hydraulic systems: principles and maintenance. (No Title).
38. Meloni, M., Zhang, Q., Cai, J., ve Lee, D. S.-H. (2023). Origami-based adaptive facade for reducing reflected solar radiation in outdoor urban environments. Sustainable Cities and Society, 97, 104740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104740
39. Nagy, Z., Svetozarevic, B., Jayathissa, P., Begle, M., Hofer, J., Lydon, G., Willmann, A., ve Schlueter, A. (2016). The adaptive solar facade: from concept to prototypes. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(2), 143-156.
40. Nie, Z., Chen, S., Zhang, S., Wu, H., Weiss, T., ve Zhao, L. (2023). Adaptive Façades Strategy: An architect-friendly computational approach based on co-simulation and white-box models for the early design stage. Energy and Buildings, 296, 113320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113320
41. Norouziasas, A., Tabadkani, A., Rahif, R., Amer, M., van Dijk, D., Lamy, H., ve Attia, S. (2023). Implementation of ISO/DIS 52016-3 for adaptive façades: A case study of an office building. Building and Environment, 235, 110195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110195
42. Parr, A. (2011). Hydraulics and pneumatics: a technician’s and engineer’s guide. Elsevier.
43. Perez, G., Sirvent, P., Sanchez-Garcia, J. A., ve Guerrero, A. (2021). Improved methodology for the characterization of thermochromic coatings for adaptive façades. Solar Energy, 230, 409-420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.10.062
44. Rizi, R. A., ve Eltaweel, A. (2021). A user detective adaptive facade towards improving visual and thermal comfort. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101554
45. Shen, L., ve Han, Y. (2022). Optimizing the modular adaptive façade control strategy in open office space using integer programming and surrogate modelling. Energy and Buildings, 254, 111546. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111546
46. Smith, J. (2017). Advanced Materials in Construction. Wiley.
47. Tabadkani, A., Nikkhah Dehnavi, A., Mostafavi, F., ve Naeini, H. G. (2023). Targeting modular adaptive façade personalization in a shared office space using fuzzy logic and genetic optimization. Journal of Building Engineering, 69, 106118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106118
48. Tabadkani, A., Roetzel, A., Li, H. X., ve Tsangrassoulis, A. (2020). A review of automatic control strategies based on simulations for adaptive facades. Building and Environment, 175, 106801. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106801
49. Tabadkani, A., Roetzel, A., Li, H. X., ve Tsangrassoulis, A. (2021a). A review of occupant-centric control strategies for adaptive facades. Automation in Construction, 122, 103464. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103464
50. Tabadkani, A., Roetzel, A., Li, H. X., ve Tsangrassoulis, A. (2021b). Design approaches and typologies of adaptive facades: A review. Automation in Construction, 121, 103450.
51. Tabadkani, A., Roetzel, A., Li, H. X., ve Tsangrassoulis, A. (2021c). Design approaches and typologies of adaptive facades: A review. Automation in Construction, 121, 103450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103450
52. Tabadkani, A., Roetzel, A., Li, H. X., ve Tsangrassoulis, A. (2022). Simulation-based personalized real-time control of adaptive facades in shared office spaces. Automation in Construction, 138, 104246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104246
53. Tabadkani, A., Tsangrassoulis, A., Roetzel, A., ve Li, H. X. (2020). Innovative control approaches to assess energy implications of adaptive facades based on simulation using EnergyPlus. Solar Energy, 206, 256-268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.087
54. Vinnitskaya, I. (2010, Ekim 17). Kiefer Technic Showroom / Ernst Giselbrecht + Partner. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/89270/kiefer-technic-showroom-ernst-giselbrecht-partner
55. Voigt, M., Roth, D., Blandini, L., ve Kreimeyer, M. (2024). An integrated design methodology for extrinsic adaptive façades – process model, standards, and case study. Journal of Building Engineering, 109810. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109810
56. Wang, C., Ji, J., Yu, B., Xu, L., Wang, Q., ve Tian, X. (2022). Investigation on the operation strategy of a hybrid BIPV/T façade in plateau areas: An adaptive regulation method based on artificial neural network. Energy, 239, 122055. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122055
57. Wang, Y., Han, Y., Wu, Y., Korkina, E., Zhou, Z., ve Gagarin, V. (2022). An occupant-centric adaptive façade based on real-time and contactless glare and thermal discomfort estimation using deep learning algorithm. Building and Environment, 214, 108907. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108907
58. Wilkinson, C., ve Wood, A. (2012). Al Bahar Towers: External Automated Shading System: Jury Statement of CTBUH Innovation Award.
59. Winstanley, T. (2011, Ekim 2). “AD Classics: Institut du Monde Arabe / Enrique Jan + Jean Nouvel + Architecture-Studio”. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/162101/ad-classics-institut-du-monde-arabe-jean-nouvel
60. Zimmer, L. (2013, Mart 26). Mexico City’s Manuel Gea Gonzalez Hospital Has an Ornate Double Skin that Filters Air Pollution. Inhabitat.
61. Zuk, W., ve Clark, R. H. (1970). Kinetic architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.