POSSIBLE IMPACTS OF RELATIONSHIP THE BIDEN DOCTRINE AND US-CHINA COMPETITION ON THE TURKISH WORLD WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF HEGEMONIA'S INTERECATION WITH POLITICAL SCIENCE AND FINANCIAL ECONOMY

Öz

The concept of “hegemony”, in the broadest sense refers to the situation where any system or system element can influence and be decisive in the functioning of another system or systems that it is inside these. Hegemony in terms of international relations and international economy and politics with its sub-disciplines refers to a country’s power to exert political influence over another country. After the World Wars, the aim of establishing a uniform global political and economic order, in which the USA was the only hegemonic power, was at the centre of the global political paradigm and strategies of the democratic party presidents in power in the USA (United States of America). After the Second World War, a bipolar international order was built in which the US hegemony controlling the seas within the framework of the Mahan doctrine and the hegemony of the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) ruling the terrestrial region of the Eurasian world by applying the terrestrial geopolitical doctrine coexisted. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, The USA has evolved into a hegemonic power that dominates the global order alone. With this; People's Republic of China; After the reform process initiated in 1978, followed by "Perestroika (economic openness policies)" and "Glasnost" (political openness policies), the People's Republic of China emerged as the hegemonic rival of the USA in the global order after the 2000s. This study aims to determine the connection between the Biden doctrine and the dynamics of US-China competition in terms of hegemony indicators within the framework of economic and financial politics of hegemony. Then, the purpose of the results obtained is to determine the possible opportunities and threats on the Turkish world and the Republic of Türkiye. The SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis method was chosen to measure the dimensions of the hegemonic rivalry between the USA and China in terms of both countries. This method enables to compare the possible strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats for a particular phenomenon in a given condition. The main reason for choosing this method is the strenghts and weaknesses of the parties against each other in the USA-China hegemonic rivalry; It provides the opportunity to evaluate the possible opportunities and threats brought by this competition together. However, The Turkish World and the Republic of Turkiye are not directly involved in this competition. For this reason, only the possible opportunities and threats that the US-Chinese competition will bring for the Turkish World and Turkiye have been determined.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hegemony
• Political Economy
• Financial Economy US-China Rivalry
• Biden Doctrine
• SWOT Analysis.

HEGEMONYANIN SİYASAL VE FİNANSAL ETKİLEŞİMİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE BIDEN DOKTRİNİ VE ABD-ÇİN REKABETİNİN TÜRK DÜNYASINA OLASI ETKİLERİ

Öz

Geniş anlamda “hegemonya” kavramı; herhangi bir sistemin ve bir sistem elemanın, başka bir sistem veya içinde bulunduğu sistemlerin işleyişi üzerinde etki edebilme ve belirleyici olabilmesi durumunu ifade etmektedir. Uluslararası ilişkiler ve alt disiplinleri olan uluslararası ekonomi ve siyaset anlamında hegemonya; bir ülkenin başka bir ülke üzerinde siyasal etki gücünü ifade etmektedir. Dünya savaşları sonrası ABD’de (Amerika Birleşik Devletleri) iktidarda olan demokrat partili başkanların küresel siyaset paradigma ve stratejilerinin merkezinde ABD’nin tek hegemonik güç olduğu yeknesak bir küresel siyasi ve ekonomik düzeni tesis etme amacı yer almıştır. İkinci dünya savaşı sonrasında “Mahan” doktrini çerçevesinde denizleri kontrol eden ABD hegemonyası ve karasal jeopolitik doktrinini uygulayarak Avrasya dünyası karasal bölgesini kontrol eden SSCB (Sovyet Sosyalist Cumhuriyetler Birliği) hegemonyasının birlikte var olduğu iki kutuplu bir uluslararası düzen inşa edilmiştir. 1991 yılında Sovyetlerin dağılması sonrası; ABD küresel düzene tek başına hükmeden bir hegemonik güce evrilmiştir. Bununla birlikte; Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti; 1978 yılında başlatılan reform süreci, devamında uygulanan “Perestroika (ekonomik açıklık politikaları)” ve “Glasnost” (siyasal açıklık politikaları) sonrasında Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti 2000’li yıllar sonrası küresel düzende ABD’nin hegemonik rakibi olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı; hegemonyanın ekonomi ve finans politiği çerçevesinde Biden doktrininin ve ABD-Çin rekabet dinamikleri ile bağlantısını hegemonya göstergeleri açısından saptamaktır. Daha sonra elde edilen sonuçların Türk dünyası ve Türkiye Cumhuriyeti üzerindeki olası fırsat ve tehditleri belirlemektir. ABD ve Çin’in hegemonik rekabetinin boyutlarını her iki ülke açısından ölçmek için için SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analizi yöntemi seçilmiştir. Bu yöntem belirli bir koşulda bir olgu için olası kuvvet, zayıflık, fırsat ve tehditleri karşılaştırmayı sağlamaktadır. Bu yöntemin seçilmesinin temel nedeni ABD-Çin hegemonik rekabetinde tarafların birbirlerine karşı üstün ve zayıf yönleri ile birlikte bu rekabetin getirdiği ; ABD-Çin rekabet dinamikleri olası sonuçlarının Türk Dünyası açısından avantajlarının yanı sıra dezavantajlarının da olabileceği yargısıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hegemonya
• Ekonomi Politik
• ABD-Çin Rekabeti
• Biden Doktrini
• SWOT Analizi.
• Finansal Ekonomi

Kaynakça

1. ARQUILLA, J. & RONFELDT, D. (1999). “The Emergence of Noopolitik: Toward an American Information Strategy. Rand”. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1033.html, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023
2. ARRIGHI, G. (1994). The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times. Verso.
3. ARRIGHI, G. (2007). Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. Verso.
4. BECKLEY, M. (2018). “The Power Of Nations: Measuring What Matters”. International Security, 43(2), 7-44.
5. BEW, J. (2014). Real Realpolitik: A History. Washington, D.C.: The Library of Congress.
6. BOLLIER, D. (2003). “How the Internet is Changing International Politics and Diplomacy”. https://www.bollier.org/files/aspen_reports/NETPOLITIK.PDF,Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023
7. BUTLER, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
8. CHECKEL, J. T. (1999). “Social Construction and Integration”. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(4), 545-560.

9. CONNELL, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power: Society, The Person And Sexual Politics. Polity Press.
10. COPELAND, D. (2010). Hard power vs. soft power. When it comes to Afghanistan, mixing military might with diplomatic talk is easier said than done. The Mark.
11. COX, R. W. (1983). “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method. Millennium:” Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 162-175.
12. CRENSHAW, K. W. (1991). “Mapping The Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color”. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
13. ÇALIK, E. S.(2018). “Literatüre Kazandırılan Yeni bir Terim: ‘Keskin Güç’ ve Çin’e Atfedilme Nedenleri”, https://ordaf.org/cin-bati-tarafindan-neden-keskin-guc-olarak-tanimlaniyor/#article-footnote, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023
14. DELGADO, R., & STEFANCIC, J. (2017). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction (3rd ed.). New York University Press.
15. ESCOBAR, A. (2001). “Culture Sits in Places: Reflections on Globalism and Subaltern Strategies of Localization”. Political Geography, 20(2), 139-174.
16. FAIRCLOUGH, N. (2001). Language and Power. Longman.
17. FENSOM, A. (2013). “America: The next energy superpower?” The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2013/01/america-the-worlds-new-petrostate/i Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023
18. FOUCAULT, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews And Other Writings, 1972-1977. Pantheon Books.
19. GANGULY, K. (2014). Machtpolitik. The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, 2224-2225.
20. GAVEL, D. (2008). Joseph Nye on Smart Power in Iran-U.S. Relations. Belfer Center.
21. GILL, S. (1990). Gramsci, Historical Materialism and İnternational Relations. Cambridge University Press.
22. GILPIN, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.
23. GODSON, R. (2012).”Between hard power and soft. The Weekly Standard”. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/between-hard-power-and-soft, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
24. GRAMSCI, A. (1971). Selections From The Prison Notebooks. International Publishers.
25. HALL, S. (1983). “The Problem of İ-Ideology – Marxism Without Guarantees”. Journal of Communications Inquiry, 7(2), 28-44.
26. JERVIS, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton University Press.
27. KEOHANE, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in The World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
28. KEOHANE, R. O. (1989). International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Westview Press.
29. KICZMA, Ł., & SUŁEK, M. (2020). National Power Rankings of Countries 2020, Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA-JR,
30. LACLAU, E. (1990). New Reflections on The Revolution Of Our Time. Verso.
31. LACLAU, E., & MOUFFE, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso.
32. MCDONALD, B. L. (2016). Food Power: The Rise and Fall Of The Postwar American Food System. Oxford Academic.
33. MEARSHEIMER, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. WW Norton & Company.
34. MERCHANT, C. (1980). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. Harper & Row.
35. MOGHADAM, V. M. (1994). Gender and National Identity: Women and Politics in Muslim Societies. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
36. MORGENTHAU, H. J., THOMSON, K., CLINTON, D. (1978). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle For Power And Peace. McGraw-Hill.
37. MUTHOO, A. (1999). Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge University Press.
38. NAISBITT, J. (1994). Global Paradox * The Bigger The World Economy, The More Powerful Its Smallest Players .William Morrow & Co
39. NOSSEL, S. (2012). Smart Power. Foreign Affairs.
40. NYE JR, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public affairs.
41. NYE, J. S. (1990). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature Of American Power. Basic Books.
42. NYE, J. S. (2003). Propaganda Isn't the Way: Soft Power. International Herald Tribune.
43. NYE, J. S., & ARMITAGE, R. L. (2007). CSIS Commission on Smart Power: A Smarter, More Secure America. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
44. PAYNE, R. (2016). Global Issues (5th ed.). Pearson Education Inc. Global Issues (5th ed.).
45. PRESS, S. (2022). “Buying Sovereignty: German "Weltpolitik" and Private Enterprise”, 1884–1914. Central European History, 55(1), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008938921001746, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
46. ROBINSON, W. I. (2004). A Theory Of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and State in A Transnational World. Johns Hopkins University Press.
47. ROCHAU, L. A. (1859). Grundsätze der Realpolitik angewendet auf die staatlichen Zustände Deutschlands. Forgotten Books
48. SAID, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Vintage.
49. SPIVAK, G. C. (1988). Can The Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism And The Interpretation Of Culture. University of Illinois Press.
50. STEGER, M. B. (2009). Globalization: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
51. STRANGE, S. (1987). The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony. International Organization, 41(4), 551–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027719
52. TERRANOVA, T. (2007). “Futurepublic: on Information Warfare, Bio-Racism and Hegemony As Noopolitics”. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 125–145.
53. THOMPSON, E. P. (1977). The poverty of theory and other essays. Monthly Review Press.
54. WALKER, C. (2018). What is 'sharp power'? Journal of Democracy, 29(3), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0041, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
55. WALKER, C., & LUDWIG, J. (2017). “The Meaning of Sharp Power: How Authoritarian States Project İnfluence”. Foreign Affairs, 96(3), 54-62.
56. WALLERSTEIN, I. (1974). The modern world-system I: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. Academic Press.
57. WALTZ, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley.
58. WALTZ, K. N. (2001). Man, the state, and war: A theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press.
59. WENDT, A. (1992). “Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics”. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
60. WILSON, E. J. (2008). “Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power. The Annals of The American” Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312618, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
61. ZEIHAN, P. (2014). The Accidental Superpower : The Next Generation of American Preeminence and The Coming Global Disorder. Crown Business.
62. ZIRULNICK, A. (2012). “Sanction Qaddafi? How 5 nations have reacted to sanctions: Iran. The Christian Science Monitor”. Retrieved from https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2011/0224/Sanction-Qaddafi- How-5-nations-have-reacted-to-sanctions/Iran, Eri-şim Tarihi, 20.03.2023
63. İnternet Kaynakları
64. http://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/media/doclibrary/171004_sfa_2017_report_hr.pdf, Erişim Tarihi, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
65. https://data.imf.org/?sk=f8032e80-b36c-43b1-ac26-493c5b1cd33b, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
66. https://data.un.org/, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
67. https://data.worldbank.org/, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
68. https://fundforpeace.org/, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
69. https://globaltrends2030.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/nic-blog-mgi-shifting-economic-center-of- gravity.pdf,Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
70. https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
71. https://research.cornell.edu/innovation-in-action, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
72. https://tr.investing.com/currencies/usd-cny, Erişim Tarihi 20.03.2023,
73. https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21732524-china-manipulating-decision-makers-western- democracies-bestdefence, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
74. https://www.heritage.org/, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
75. https://www.insead.edu/, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
76. https://www.sipri.org/, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
77. https://www.usgs.gov/, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
78. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/U.S.-Indo-Pacific-Strategy.pdf, Erişim Tarihi, 15.02.2023
79. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Pacific-Partnership-Strategy.pdf,’lerinden yararlanılarak yazarlar tarafından oluşturulmuştur. Erişim Tarihi, 01.03.2023.
80. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Pacific-Partnership-Strategy.pdf, Erişim Tarihi, 15.02.2023
81. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National- Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023.
82. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National- Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf, Erişim Tarihi, 18.04.2023
83. https://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html, Erişim Tarihi, 20.03.2023