Araştırma Makalesi

DARIUS' SAGARTIA AND SARGON'S ZIKIRTU: WERE THEY THE SAME PLACE?

Cilt: 22 Sayı: 87 26 Eylül 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

DARIUS' SAGARTIA AND SARGON'S ZIKIRTU: WERE THEY THE SAME PLACE?

Öz

Following the decipherment of the Behistun Inscription, researchers began proposing that Sagartia, one of the rebellious countries mentioned in the inscription, might be the same as Zikirtu, a land mentioned in Assyrian texts. For over a century, most researchers working on this topic seem to have more or less accepted the equation Sagartia = Zikirtu. Additionally, efforts have been observed to separately associate both Sagartia and Zikirtu with Zakruti, a city likely located in the Central Zagros region, as mentioned in Assyrian texts. Some researchers who equate Sagartia with Zikirtu have attempted to bring the two geographically closer (or even merge them) in their proposed locations. Others, considering references from various sources, have accepted that while these two lands might occupy different geographical locations, they represent the same ethnic community. To frame this tendency within a logical context, hypotheses have been constructed suggesting that the same people were dispersed across several regions or that they migrated during different periods in history. In this study, we critically examined the hypothesis that equates the two lands and their peoples by taking into account the historical texts that contain information about these two lands, as well as the views of researchers who have worked on this topic from past to present. We also presented our own proposals regarding the probable locations of these lands. Our conclusion is that Zikirtu and Sagartia were not the same in terms of geography, nor were their populations identical in cultural or ethnographic terms. At the very least, it is clear that we do not possess convincing evidence to support such an equivalence.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. AMMIANUS MARCELLINUS, History, translated by John Carew Rolfe (1859-1943), from Am-mianus Marcellinus With An English Translation, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann, Ltd. 1935-1940 (Online Access - 30.12.2024) https://topostext.org/work/493
  2. DIODORUS SICULUS, Library, Books 8-32 translated by Charles Henry Oldfather (1887-1954), from the Loeb Classical Library edition of 1933. (Online Access - 16.12.2024) https://topostext.org/work/133
  3. DIODORUS SICULUS, Library, Books 33-40 (fragments), a translation assembled, corrected, supplemented and placed on line by Andrew Smith at Attalus.org, drawing on older translations by George Booth (1635-1719), edition of 1814, and Ferdinand Hoefer (1811-1878) (1865). (Online Access - 16.12.2024) https://topostext.org/work/134
  4. HERODOTOS, The Histories, translated by George Campbell Macaulay (1852-1915), from the 1890 Macmillan edition now in the public domain, text placed on line by Project Guten-berg. (Online Access - 10.10.2024) https://topostext.org/work/22
  5. ISIDORE OF KHARAKS, Parthian Stations, translated by Wilfred Harvey Schoff (1874-1932), London 1914. (Online Access - 5.1.2025) https://topostext.org/work/583
  6. PLINY THE ELDER, The Natural History, Books 1-11, translated by Henry T. Riley (1816-1878) and John Bostock (1773-1846), first published 1855, text from the Perseus Pro-ject. (Online Access - 7.1.2025) https://topostext.org/work/148
  7. POLYBIUS, The Histories, translated by William Roger Paton (1857-1921), from the Loeb Clas-sical Library edition of 1922. (Online Access - 13.1.2025) https://topostext.org/work/129
  8. PTOLEMEI, CLAUDII VIRI ALECANDRINI, Mathematice discipline Philosophi doctissimi Geog-raphie, opus nouissima traductione e Grecorum archetypis castigatissime pressum (...), (adapted by) Jacobus “Angelus de Scarperia” et al, Strassbourg, 1513. (Online Access - 18.12.2024)

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Tarihi Coğrafya

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

26 Eylül 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Mayıs 2025

Kabul Tarihi

14 Eylül 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 87

Kaynak Göster

APA
Pınarcik, P. (2025). DARIUS’ SAGARTIA AND SARGON’S ZIKIRTU: WERE THEY THE SAME PLACE? Karadeniz Araştırmaları, 22(87), 1012-1047. https://doi.org/10.56694/karadearas.1688760
AMA
1.Pınarcik P. DARIUS’ SAGARTIA AND SARGON’S ZIKIRTU: WERE THEY THE SAME PLACE? Karadeniz Araştırmaları. 2025;22(87):1012-1047. doi:10.56694/karadearas.1688760
Chicago
Pınarcik, Pınar. 2025. “DARIUS’ SAGARTIA AND SARGON’S ZIKIRTU: WERE THEY THE SAME PLACE?”. Karadeniz Araştırmaları 22 (87): 1012-47. https://doi.org/10.56694/karadearas.1688760.
EndNote
Pınarcik P (01 Eylül 2025) DARIUS’ SAGARTIA AND SARGON’S ZIKIRTU: WERE THEY THE SAME PLACE? Karadeniz Araştırmaları 22 87 1012–1047.
IEEE
[1]P. Pınarcik, “DARIUS’ SAGARTIA AND SARGON’S ZIKIRTU: WERE THEY THE SAME PLACE?”, Karadeniz Araştırmaları, c. 22, sy 87, ss. 1012–1047, Eyl. 2025, doi: 10.56694/karadearas.1688760.
ISNAD
Pınarcik, Pınar. “DARIUS’ SAGARTIA AND SARGON’S ZIKIRTU: WERE THEY THE SAME PLACE?”. Karadeniz Araştırmaları 22/87 (01 Eylül 2025): 1012-1047. https://doi.org/10.56694/karadearas.1688760.
JAMA
1.Pınarcik P. DARIUS’ SAGARTIA AND SARGON’S ZIKIRTU: WERE THEY THE SAME PLACE? Karadeniz Araştırmaları. 2025;22:1012–1047.
MLA
Pınarcik, Pınar. “DARIUS’ SAGARTIA AND SARGON’S ZIKIRTU: WERE THEY THE SAME PLACE?”. Karadeniz Araştırmaları, c. 22, sy 87, Eylül 2025, ss. 1012-47, doi:10.56694/karadearas.1688760.
Vancouver
1.Pınar Pınarcik. DARIUS’ SAGARTIA AND SARGON’S ZIKIRTU: WERE THEY THE SAME PLACE? Karadeniz Araştırmaları. 01 Eylül 2025;22(87):1012-47. doi:10.56694/karadearas.1688760