RUSYA FEDERASYONUNDA AZINLIK POLİTİKALARI VE KIRIM TATARLARI

Öz

Kırım Tatarları ve Rusya Federasyonu arasındaki ilişkileri siyasi ve hukuki açılardan incelemek; ikili ilişkilerin tarihinin, tarafların birbirlerini algılayışının yanı sıra Rusya'nın federatif yapısının da anlaşılmasına yardımcı olacaktır. Tarihi ilişkilerin etkisiyle taraflar birbirlerine mesafeli yaklaşmakta ve çeşitli çıkarlarında, taleplerinde ısrar etmektedirler. Kırım Tatarları değişen konjonktürde dillerini, kültürlerini ve can güvenliklerini korumayı amaçlamaktadır. Rusya ise federasyonun temelini çokkültürlülüğe dayandırmaya ve Sovyet federasyonun maruz kaldığı sorunları baştan engellemeye çalışmaktadır. Bu bağlamda Kırım Tatarlarının yerli halk olarak tanınma, self- determinasyon taleplerine Rusya'nın vereceği cevap ikili ilişkiler açısından önem teşkil etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Rusya
• federalizm
• Kırım Tatarları
• yerli halk
• çokkültürlülük

Öz

Political and legal analysis of relations betvveen Crimean Tatars and Russian Federation will help to figüre out not only history of bilateral relations, parties' mutual perceptions but also to figüre out Russia's federal structure. Under the influence of historical relations, parties put distance between themselves and insist on their various goals and demands. In this changing conjuncture, Crimean Tatars aim to pre- serve their mother language, culture and their life safety. On the other hand, Russia tries to ground its federal structure on multiculturalism and to prevent problems önce faced by the Soviet Union. Thus, Rus- sia’s ansvvers to Crimean Tatars’ demands on recognition as indige- nous people and on self-determination have uttermost importance for bilateral relations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Russia
• federalism
• Crimean Tatars
• indigenous people
• multiculturalism
• Russia, federalism, Crimean Tatars, indigenous people, multiculturalism

Kaynakça

1. BIRNBAUM, M. (2014). "Crimean Tatars Say Russian Annexation Has Brought Fear and Repression All Over Again”, The Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/ (01 Şubat 2015).
2. BOWRING, B. (2013)."Chapter 4: Minorites' protection in Russia: is there a 'communist legacy?”, in Karl Cordell, Timofey Agarin and Alexander Osipov (eds.), Institutional Legacies of Communism: Change and Con- tinuities in Minority Protection, Routledge, 2013, New York, s.45-58.
3. CEMİLOĞLU, M. "A Hsitory of the Crimean Tatar National Movement”, in M. Drohobycky (ed.), Crimea: Dynamics, Challenges and Prospects, Lan- ham, Rowman & Littefield, s. 87-105.
4. "Crimea Approves New Constitution”, Pravda, http://english.pravda.ru, 11 April 2014 (15 Şubat 2015).
5. "Crimean Authorities to Ignore Crimean Tatar Mejlis Until Its Official Registration”, TASS, http://tass.ru/en/, 16 October 2014, (15 Şubat 2015).
6. "Crimean Tatars Demand Recognition of Governing Bodies”, TASS, http://tass.ru/en/, 18 May 2014 (29 Ocak 2015).
7. "Entrance to Russia Closed for Head of Crimea's Majlis”, TASS, http://itar- tass.com/en/, 07 July 2014 (13 Şubat 2014).
8. "Inter-ethnic Tension in Crimea Inadmissible-Putin”, TASS, http://itar- tass.com/en/, 14 October 2014 (02 Şubat 2015).

9. LUHN, A. (2014). "Vladimir Putin Tells Crimea's Tatars their Future Lies with Russia”, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/, 16 May 2014 (03 Şubat 2015).
10. OBYDENKOVA, A. (2005)."Institutional Tools of Conflict Management- Asymmetrical Federalism in Ethnic-Territorial Conflicts: Quantative Analysis of Russian Regions”, Peace, Conflict and Development: An InterdisciplinaryJournal, Vol. 7, July 2005, s. 251-280.
11. OSIPOV, A. (2014)."What do the Crimean Tatars face in Crimea?”, European Centre for Minority Issues Brief # 32, April 2014.
12. "Putin Says Decree Prepared to Rehabilitate Crimean Tatars, Victims of Stalin Repression”, TASS, http://tass.ru/en/, 17 April 2014 (14 Şubat 2015).
13. "Russia”, U.S. English Foundation Research, http://www.usefoundation. org/ (10 Şubat 2015).
14. RYZHKOV, V. (2014). "Russia's Treatment of Crimean Tatars Echoes Mis- takes Made by Soviets”, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com, 25 November 2014 (02 Şubat 2015).
15. SMITH, D. J. (2013)."Non-Territorial Autonomy and Political Community in Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe”, Journal on Ethnopolitcs and Minority Issues in Europe, Vol. 12, No. 1, s. 27-55
16. SMITH, G. [1998). "Russia, Multiculturalism and Federal Justice”, Europe- Asia Studies, Vol. 50, No. 8,1998, s.1393-1411.
17. "Statement of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, to ali people of Ukraine - Ukrainian Citizens of ali Natio- nalites”, Euromaidan Press, http://euromaidanpress.com/, 15 March 2014 [27 Ocak 2015).
18. SUKHOV, I. "Russian Federalism and Evolution of Self-Determination”, Russia in Global Affairs, No. 3, 08 August 2007,
19. http://eng.globalaffairs. ru/number/n_9125 [11 Şubat 2015).
20. "The Constitution of the Russian Federation”, http://www.constitution. ru/en/ [09 Şubat 2015). The World Factbook, "Ethnic Groups”, https://www.cia.gov/
21. VARETT0NI, W. [2011)."Crimea’s Overlooked Instability”, The Washington Quarterly, Summer 2011, s.87-99.
22. WILS0N, A. "The Crimean Tatars: A Quarter of a Century after Their Return”, Security and Human Rights, 2013, s. 418-431.
23. WINNING, A. [2014). "Resist or Cooperate? Crimean Tatars Split Över Russian Rule”, Reuters, http://www.reuters.com/, 15 May 2014 [28 Ocak 2015).
24. YAKOVENKO, A.[2014)."Rights of Indigenous Peoples within post-2015 Development Agenda”, RT, http://rt.com/, 02 October 2014 [15 Şubat 2015).
25. YAROSLAVTSEV, V. "Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and Protection of Minorities”, Tribunal Constitutional, http://tribunalcons titucional.ad
26. YAZ’KOVA, A. A. [2006)."Russia and Its Minorities: An Overview of Existing and Potential Ethno-Political Conflicts", Innovation, Vol. 19, Nos. 3/4, 2006, s. 279
27. ZADORIN, M. (2012). "The Overview of Russian Legislation on Indigenous Peoples' Rights",