Öz
This article, first of all, aims to explain discussions in the academic world concerning narrative history in terms of style, language, content and theory. Thus, it would be possible to demonstrate weaknesses and strengths of narrative history writing – an old and often-used way of writing history- in comparison with some other historical approaches. Secondly, new approaches to narrative history called by some historians as ‘new narrative’ will be discussed. As a result of all these discussions and evaluations it is aimed at contributing a better understanding of narrative history, which is widely used in Turkish history writing but little known in terms of theory and methodology.
Kaynakça
- APPLEBY Joyce-HUNT Lynn–JACOB Margaret (1994), Telling the Truth About History, New York: W.W. Norton&Company. BRAUDEL Fernand (1980), On History, Chicago: Chicago University Press. CARR Edward H. (2005), Tarih Nedir? (çev. Misket Gizem Gürtürk), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. CRONON William (1992), “A Place for Stories: Nature, History and Narrative”, The Journal of American History, LXXVIII (4):1347-1376. DANTO Arthur C. (1956), “On Explanation in History”, Philosophy of Science, XXIII (1): 15-30. DAVIDSON James W. (1984), “The New Narrative History: How New? How Narrative”, Reviews in American History, XII (3): 322-334. DAVIES Stephen (2003), Empiricism and History, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. HOBSBAWM Eric (1999), Tarih Üzerine (tr. Osman Akınhay), Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat. HARRISON Robert–JONES Aled–LAMBERT Peter (2004), “The Institutionalisation and Organisation of History”, Making History: An Introduction to the History and Practices of a Discipline (ed. Peter Lambert - Philipp Schofield), London and New York: Routledge. HUNT Lynn (1986), “French History in the Last Twenty Years: The Rise and Fall of the Annales Paradigm”, Journal of Contemporary History, Twentieth Anniversary Issue, XXI (2): 209-224. LOUCH A. R. (1969), “History as Narrative”, History and Theory, VIII (1): 54-70. MANDELBAUM Maurice (1967), “A Note on History as Narrative”, History and Theory, VI (3): 413-419. McCULLAGH C.B. (1969), “Narrative and Explanation in History”, Mind, New Series, LXXVIII (310): 256-261. function in favor of some kind of generalized sociology. But then they shall no longer be doing history, but something else, perhaps even more valuable. And who shall then do history?’’
Öz
Bu makalenin amacı öncelikle tarih yazımında önemli bir yeri olan anlatı tarihle ilgili akademik dünyada yaşanan üsluptan dile içerikten teoriye bir takım tartışmaları ortaya koymaktır. Bu sayede, tarihçiler tarafından uzun zamandır ve sıklıkla kullanılan anlatı tarih yazımının diğer bazı tarihsel yaklaşımlar karşısında güçlü ve zayıf yönleri gösterilecektir. Sonrasında ise bazı tarihçilerin ‘yeni anlatı’ adıyla ortaya koydukları anlatı tarih üzerine birtakım yeni yaklaşımlar tartışılacaktır. Bütün bu değerlendirmelerin sonucunda bu makale, tarih yazımında Türkiye’de de sıkça kullanılan ama teorik ve metodolojik özellikleri açısından iyi tanınmayan anlatı tarihin tarihçiler açısından daha iyi şekilde anlaşılmasına katkı sunmamayı hedeflemektedir.
Kaynakça
- APPLEBY Joyce-HUNT Lynn–JACOB Margaret (1994), Telling the Truth About History, New York: W.W. Norton&Company. BRAUDEL Fernand (1980), On History, Chicago: Chicago University Press. CARR Edward H. (2005), Tarih Nedir? (çev. Misket Gizem Gürtürk), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. CRONON William (1992), “A Place for Stories: Nature, History and Narrative”, The Journal of American History, LXXVIII (4):1347-1376. DANTO Arthur C. (1956), “On Explanation in History”, Philosophy of Science, XXIII (1): 15-30. DAVIDSON James W. (1984), “The New Narrative History: How New? How Narrative”, Reviews in American History, XII (3): 322-334. DAVIES Stephen (2003), Empiricism and History, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. HOBSBAWM Eric (1999), Tarih Üzerine (tr. Osman Akınhay), Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat. HARRISON Robert–JONES Aled–LAMBERT Peter (2004), “The Institutionalisation and Organisation of History”, Making History: An Introduction to the History and Practices of a Discipline (ed. Peter Lambert - Philipp Schofield), London and New York: Routledge. HUNT Lynn (1986), “French History in the Last Twenty Years: The Rise and Fall of the Annales Paradigm”, Journal of Contemporary History, Twentieth Anniversary Issue, XXI (2): 209-224. LOUCH A. R. (1969), “History as Narrative”, History and Theory, VIII (1): 54-70. MANDELBAUM Maurice (1967), “A Note on History as Narrative”, History and Theory, VI (3): 413-419. McCULLAGH C.B. (1969), “Narrative and Explanation in History”, Mind, New Series, LXXVIII (310): 256-261. function in favor of some kind of generalized sociology. But then they shall no longer be doing history, but something else, perhaps even more valuable. And who shall then do history?’’
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Ağustos 2013 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2013 Cilt: 38 Sayı: 38 |
