Provincial Assessment of IPPC Compliance Status of Facilities Operating in the “Surface Treatment of Metals and Plastics (STM)” Sector

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 22 - 34, 30.06.2023

Mehmet Kazım Yetik Rahman Çalhan

Öz

This study is carried out in Turkey within the scope of Best Available Techniques (BAT) prepared in accordance with Article 16 (2)
of Council Directive 96/61 / EC (IPPC Directive) Reference Document (BREF) for facilities operating in the “Surface Treatment of
Metals and Plastics (STM)” sector. It was conducted to ascertain the level of compliance with the Integrated Pollution Prevention and
Control (IPPC) regulations of the facilities operating in Turkey, the transitional periods to IPPC, and their distribution by provinces.
For the study, a survey of the facilities covered by the directive was conducted, and the responses from the institutions were statistically
analyzed. According to the results of the analysis, the distribution of the facilities within the scope by provinces in Turkey, which BAT
should be prioritized for IPPC compliance, and the time required for the necessary improvements/investments were determined

Anahtar Kelimeler

Integrated pollution prevention and control, Surface treatment of metals and plastics, Best available techniques, Surface coating, Galvanizing, Wastewater

“Metallerin ve Plastiklerin Yüzey İşlemi (STM)” Sektöründe Faaliyet Gösteren Tesislerin EKÖK Uyum Durumunun İl Bazında Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Bu çalışma “Metallerin ve Plastiklerin Yüzey İşlemi (STM)” sektöründe faaliyet gösteren tesisler Referans Belgesi (BREF), 96/61 / EC sayılı Konsey Direktifinin (IPPC Direktifi) 16 (2) Maddesi uyarınca hazırlanan Mevcut En İyi Teknikler (MET) kapsamında Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren tesislerin Entegre Kirlilik Önleme ve Kontrolü (EKÖK) mevzuatına uyum durumunun, EKÖK’e geçiş sürelerinin ve illere göre dağılımlarının belirlenmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada, direktif kapsamına giren tesislere anket düzenlenmiş ve tesislerden gelen cevaplar istatiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre kapsam dahilindeki tesislerin Türkiye’de illere göre dağılımları, EKÖK uyumu için hangi MET’lere öncelik verilmesi gerektiği ve gereken iyileştirme/yatırımlar için gereken süreler belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entegre kirlilik önleme ve kontrol, Metallerin ve plastiklerin yüzey işlemi, Mevcut en iyi teknikler, Yüzey kaplama, Galvaniz, Atıksu

Kaynakça

• Avrupa Komisyonu (AB) (2008). 15 Ocak 2008 tarih ve 2008/1/EC sayılı Entegre Kirliliği Önleme ve Kontrol konulu konsey direktifi. Brüksel. http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/ 25.05.2022.
• Barros, M.C., Torres. M.T., Bello P.M. 2008. Integrated pollution prevention and control in the surface treatment ındustries in Galicia (NW Spain). Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 10(2): 175–188.
• Çavuşoğlu B., Ekmekyapar F. 2019. “Mevcut En İyi Teknikler ( MET ) Kapsamında Tekstil Endüstrisinde Kostik Geri Kazanımının Değerlendirilmesi.” 3412: 6–10.
• Environment Agency. 2004. Consultation Draft - Guidance for the Surface Treatment of Metals and Plastics by Electrolytic and Chemical Processes. Bristol. www.environment-agency. gov.uk. 26.04.2022
• Gartiser, S., Hafner, C., Hercher, C., Kronenberger-Schäfer,K., Paschke, A. 2010. Whole effluent assessment of ındustrial wastewater for determination of BAT compliance. Part 2: Metal surface treatment industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 17(5): 1149–1157.
• Honkasalo, Niina, Håkan Rodhe, and Carl Dalhammar. 2005. “Environmental Permitting as a Driver for Eco-Efficiency in the Dairy Industry: A Closer Look at the IPPC Directive.” Journal of Cleaner Production 13(10–11): 1049–60.
• Karström, K., Noreng, J., Gidlund, J., Lundström, J., Amanda,H., Cederberg-Krohn, B., Skinnari, V. 2020. Surface Treatment Industry in the Nordic Countries Overview and BAT Examples Nordic Publications, Copenhagen.
• Kocabaş, A. Merve, Hande Yukseler, Filiz B. Dilek, and Ulku Yetis. 2009. “Adoption of European Union’s IPPC Directive to a Textile Mill: Analysis of Water and Energy Consumption.” Journal of Environmental Management 91(1): 102–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.012.
• Kovacs, M., Calamar A.N., Toth, L., Simion, S. Simion A. 2019. Verifying compliance of a metallic surface treatment company with bat requirements, to minimize emissions of pollutants in water. International symposium “The Environment and The Industry”. SIMI 2019, s. 285–292.
• López-Gamero, M. D., Molina-Azorín, J. F., Claver-Cortés, E. 2010. The potential of environmental regulation to change managerial perception, environmental management, competitiveness and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(10–11): 963–974.
• Nakonieczny, A., and M. Kieszkowski. 2006. “Toward Cleaner Production Technologies in Surface Treatment of Metals.” WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 92: 57–64.
• Santonja, G.G., Karlis, P. 2020. Developing EU environmental standards for the food, drink and milk industries: key environmental issues and data collection. Environmental Sciences Europe 32(1): 1–26.
• Silvo, Kimmo, Timo Jouttijärvi, and Matti Melanen. 2009. “Implications of Regulation Based on the IPPC Directive - A Review on the Finnish Pulp and Paper Industry.” Journal of Cleaner Production 17(8): 713–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.011.
• Vázquez, V.L, Rodriguez, G., Daddi, T., Giacomo, M. R. D., Polders, C., Dils, E., 2015. “Policy Challenges in Transferring the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Approach to Southern Mediterranean Countries: A Case Study.” Journal of Cleaner Production 107 (November 2010): 486–97.