Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

REVISITING THE MARGINS OF LITERARY CRITICISM: MEDUSA REPLICATED

Yıl 2023, , 63 - 70, 29.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.38060/kare.1331661

Öz

Literary criticism’s deep-rooted history, effortlessly traceable back to Plato, might be challenging to grasp without comparing the historical sequence of distinctive periods along with frequently shifting or diversifying perspectives. Several scholarly studies tend to elaborate on the distinct historical periods, aiming to conduct in-depth analyses for literary criticism. This practical albeit conventional approach carries the potential risk of overlooking the idea of revisiting earlier critical accounts to unveil novel insights. A classical understanding of historiography can also complicate the interconnection and flow of the various movements of literary criticism’s already broad history. As such, this particular research aims to revisit seminal representatives of the literary criticism throughout various epochs, constructing a chronological and intersecting narrative in a progressive sequence. The narrative originating from the artwork titled “The Raft of the Medusa” shall serve as the foundational basis for this research to further explore the interconnection existing between literary criticism and visual representations. This paper intends to narrate the historical journey of literary criticism by following the footsteps of several prominent figures and analysing the ways in which they intersect or conflict; while remaining committed to the chronological sequence of literary criticism. The fact that the article provides a discourse of that nature serves a consequential introduction to the history of literary criticism.

Kaynakça

  • Aden, John M. "Dryden, Corneille, and the Essay of Dramatic Poesy," The Review of English Studies (Oxford University Press) 6, (1955): 147-148.
  • Alighieri, Dante. De vulgari eloquentia. Translated by Stephen Botterill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Arata, Stephen. "Henry James, "The Art of Fiction" (1884)," Victorian Review (The Johns Hopkins University Press) 35 (1), (2009): 53-55.
  • Aristotle, Longinus and Demetrius. Aristotle: Poetics; Longinus: On the Sublime; Demetrius: On Style. Translated by W. Hamilton Fyfe. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1995.
  • Aristotle. Poetics. Translated by Joe Sachs. Newburyport, Massachusetts: Focus Publishing / R. Pullins Company, 2006.
  • Baines, Paul. The Complete Critical Guide to Alexander Pope. Edited by Richard Bradford and Jan Jedrzejewski. London: Routledge, 2000.
  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Translated by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
  • Blamires, Harry. A History of Literary Criticism. Edited by A. Norman Jeffares. Bloomsbury Publishing, 1991.
  • Bloom, Harold. Percy Bysshe Shelley: Comprehensive Research and Study Guide. New York: Chelsea House Publications, 2001.
  • Bressler, Charles E. Literary Criticism An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Pearson, 2011.
  • Eisner, Martin. "Boccaccio between Dante and Petrarch" in Boccaccio and the Invention of Italian Literature: Dante, Petrarch, Cavalcanti, and the Authority of the Vernacular, Edited by Martin Eisner, 5-9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • Freccero, John. The Cambridge Companion to Dante. Edited by Rachel Jacoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Habib, M. A. R. A History of Literary Criticism and Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
  • Hall, Vernon. A Short History of Literary Criticism. London: Merlin Press, 1964.
  • Halliwell, Stephen. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Edited by George A. Kennedy. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  • Holquist, Michael. Dialogism: Bakhtin and his World. 2nd Edition. Edited by Terence Hawkes. London: Routledge, 2002.
  • Lewisohn, Ludwig. "A Study of Matthew Arnold. III. Arnold's Critical Method," The Sewanee Review (The Johns Hopkins University Press) 10 (3), (1902): 305-306.
  • Lombardo, Patrizia. "Hippolyte Taine between Art and Science," Yale French Studies (Yale University Press) (1990): 124.
  • Machann, Clinton. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Edited by M. A. R. Habib. Vol. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • Mason, Emma. The Cambridge Introduction to William Wordsworth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • Plato. The Republic. Edited by G. R. F. Ferrari. Translated by Tom Griffith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Letters from a Stoic. Edited by Betty Radice. Translated by Robin Campbell. London: Penguin Books, 1969.
  • Trimpi, Wesley. "Sir Philip Sidney’s An apology for poetry" in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Edited by Glyn P. Norton, 192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • Weinbrot, Howard D. "Pope and the classics" in The Cambridge Companion to Alexander Pope, Edited by Pat Rogers, 86-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

EDEBİ ELEŞTİRİ SINIRLARINA YOLCULUK: MEDUSA YENİDEN

Yıl 2023, , 63 - 70, 29.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.38060/kare.1331661

Öz

Edebiyat eleştirisinin hâlihazırda Platon'a kadar takip edilebilen köklü tarihi, farklı dönemlerin tarihsel gelişimleri ile sıklıkla değişen ya da çeşitlenen perspektifleri karşılaştırılmaksızın anlaşılması zor olabilir. Birçok akademik çalışma, edebiyat eleştirisi için derinlemesine analizler yapmayı amaçlayarak, farklı tarihsel dönemler üzerinde durma eğilimindedir. Bu pratik ancak geleneksel yaklaşım, yeni kavrayışları ortaya çıkarma amacıyla daha önceki eleştirel anlatıları yeniden gözden geçirme fikrini göz ardı etme riskini taşır. Klasik bir tarih yazını anlayışı da edebiyat eleştirisinin zaten geniş olan tarihindeki çeşitli akımların birbiriyle bağlantısını ve bunların akışını ele almayı daha da güçleştirebilir. Bu nedenle, söz konusu araştırma, edebiyat eleştirisinin çeşitli dönemlerindeki önemli temsilcilerini yeniden ele almayı, kronolojik ve kesişen bir anlatıyı aşamalı olarak kurgulamayı amaçlamaktadır. "Medusa'nın Salı" adlı sanat eserinden yola çıkan bu çalışma, edebiyat eleştirisi ile görsel temsiller arasında var olan bağlantıyı derinlemesine keşfetmek için bahsedilen eseri bu araştırmanın başında ve sonunda temel dayanağı olarak kullanacaktır. Bu makale, kronolojik anlatıya sadık kalmasının yanı sıra edebiyat eleştirisinin tarihsel yolculuğunu bazı önemli düşünürlerin zaman zaman kesişen ya da çatışan fikirlerini analiz ederek aktarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Makalenin bu yönde bir söylem sunması, edebiyat eleştirisi tarihinin temellerine yeniden bir giriş niteliği taşımaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Aden, John M. "Dryden, Corneille, and the Essay of Dramatic Poesy," The Review of English Studies (Oxford University Press) 6, (1955): 147-148.
  • Alighieri, Dante. De vulgari eloquentia. Translated by Stephen Botterill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Arata, Stephen. "Henry James, "The Art of Fiction" (1884)," Victorian Review (The Johns Hopkins University Press) 35 (1), (2009): 53-55.
  • Aristotle, Longinus and Demetrius. Aristotle: Poetics; Longinus: On the Sublime; Demetrius: On Style. Translated by W. Hamilton Fyfe. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1995.
  • Aristotle. Poetics. Translated by Joe Sachs. Newburyport, Massachusetts: Focus Publishing / R. Pullins Company, 2006.
  • Baines, Paul. The Complete Critical Guide to Alexander Pope. Edited by Richard Bradford and Jan Jedrzejewski. London: Routledge, 2000.
  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Translated by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
  • Blamires, Harry. A History of Literary Criticism. Edited by A. Norman Jeffares. Bloomsbury Publishing, 1991.
  • Bloom, Harold. Percy Bysshe Shelley: Comprehensive Research and Study Guide. New York: Chelsea House Publications, 2001.
  • Bressler, Charles E. Literary Criticism An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Pearson, 2011.
  • Eisner, Martin. "Boccaccio between Dante and Petrarch" in Boccaccio and the Invention of Italian Literature: Dante, Petrarch, Cavalcanti, and the Authority of the Vernacular, Edited by Martin Eisner, 5-9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • Freccero, John. The Cambridge Companion to Dante. Edited by Rachel Jacoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Habib, M. A. R. A History of Literary Criticism and Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
  • Hall, Vernon. A Short History of Literary Criticism. London: Merlin Press, 1964.
  • Halliwell, Stephen. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Edited by George A. Kennedy. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  • Holquist, Michael. Dialogism: Bakhtin and his World. 2nd Edition. Edited by Terence Hawkes. London: Routledge, 2002.
  • Lewisohn, Ludwig. "A Study of Matthew Arnold. III. Arnold's Critical Method," The Sewanee Review (The Johns Hopkins University Press) 10 (3), (1902): 305-306.
  • Lombardo, Patrizia. "Hippolyte Taine between Art and Science," Yale French Studies (Yale University Press) (1990): 124.
  • Machann, Clinton. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Edited by M. A. R. Habib. Vol. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • Mason, Emma. The Cambridge Introduction to William Wordsworth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • Plato. The Republic. Edited by G. R. F. Ferrari. Translated by Tom Griffith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Letters from a Stoic. Edited by Betty Radice. Translated by Robin Campbell. London: Penguin Books, 1969.
  • Trimpi, Wesley. "Sir Philip Sidney’s An apology for poetry" in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Edited by Glyn P. Norton, 192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • Weinbrot, Howard D. "Pope and the classics" in The Cambridge Companion to Alexander Pope, Edited by Pat Rogers, 86-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Edebi Teori, Edebi Çalışmalar (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Selçuk Şentürk 0000-0002-6084-4032

Serhat Ergül 0009-0002-7276-5101

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 26 Aralık 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 23 Temmuz 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023

Kaynak Göster

Chicago Şentürk, Selçuk, ve Serhat Ergül. “REVISITING THE MARGINS OF LITERARY CRITICISM: MEDUSA REPLICATED”. KARE, sy. 16 (Aralık 2023): 63-70. https://doi.org/10.38060/kare.1331661.

30137 Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

16509   16510  16511  16512


NOT: DİZİN BİLGİLERİ İÇİN LOGOLARA TIKLAYINIZ.