In Deleuze and Guattari: What is the Minor Writing? from the Perspective of Difference and the Minor Literature

Yıl 2021, , 268 - 290, 31.07.2021

Sinan Kılıç

https://doi.org/10.38060/kare.871521

Öz

In this article, what the minor writing is will be explained from the perspective of philosophy of difference, and Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature, which is written by Deleuze and Guattari. For Deleuze, the problem of writing is the matter of language which can be called as the minor, and the major language. In this perspective, it can be said that there are two kinds of writing: the minor writing and the major writing. Whereas the minor writing is related to creative thinking, writing and philosophy, the major writing is related to memory, representation and Freudian psychoanalysis. But, Deleuze and Guattari say that the aim of writing is not to represent some personal events, memories, desires, but to create the new concepts that do not represent some personal events, or psychological problems. So, while the aim of the minor writing is to change the rules of grammar of the major language, the aim of the major writing is to represent things, events that have occurred before. As a result, in this article “what the minor writing is,” “what three parts of the minor writing are,” “who is a minor writer?” will be discussed. Shortly, it should be said that the minor writing is a kind of philosophical writing and reading.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Minor Writing, Minör Literature,, Gilles Deleuze, Major Writing

Kaynakça

• Bryden Mary, Gilles Deleuze-Travels in Literature, New York: Palgrave Macmillian 2007.
• Charles J. Stivale, “Gilles Deleuze&Felix Guattari: Schizoanalysis&Literary Discourse”, Substance, 1980. Vol. 9, No. 4, Issue 29 (1980), pp. 46-57. http://www.jstor.com/stable/3684040
• Baugh Bruce, “How Deleuze can help us make Literature work,” Deleuze and Literature, Edinburg: Edinburg University Press, 2000, pp. 34-56.
• Crawford T. Hugh, “The Paterson Plateau: Deleuze, Guattari and William Carlos Williams,” Deleuze and Literature, Edinburg: Edinburg University Press, 2000, pp. 57-79.
• Corngold Stanly, “Kafka and the Dialect of Minor Literature,” College Literature, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Feb., 1994), pp. 89-101. http://www.jstor.com/stable/25112084
• Deleuze Gilles, Essays Critical and Clinical, translated by Daniel W. Smith and Michael a. Greco, New York: Verso, 1998.
• Gilles Deleuze, Pure Immanence, Essays on A Life, translated by Anne Boyman, New York: Zone Books, 2001.
• Deleuze. G-Guattari. F, Kafka Toward a Minor Literature, translated by dana Polan, London: University of Minnesota Press, 1986.
• Deleuze Gilles, The Logic of Sense, translated by Mark Lester with Charles Stivale, London: The Athlone Press, 1990.
• Deleuze Gilles, Desert Islands and Other Texts, translated by Michael Taomina, New York: Semiotext(e) 2002.
• Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari Felix, What is Philosophy? Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell, New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
• Lambert Gregg, Who’s Afraid of Deleuze and Guattari? London: Continuum, 2206.
• Marks John, “Gilles Deleuze-Vitalism and Multiplicty,” The Literary Machine, Pluto Press, pp.123-139. http://www.jstor.com/stable/j.ctt18mvnkx.11
• Pearson Keith Ansell, “Deleuze, Philozophy, and Immanence,” Deleuze and Religion, edited by Mary Bryden, London: Routledge, 2001, pp.141-155,