Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty

Emre Şan

doi:10.20981/kaygi.342182

Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty

Öz

My guiding research hypothesis is as follows: the significant progress made by the phenomenology of immanence (according to which no worldly hetero-givenness would be possible without subjectif self-givenness) and by the phenomenology of transcendence (which states that no subjectif self-givenness would be possible without worldly hetero-givenness) are not distinguished so much by the positing of new problems as by the reformulation of “the question of the ground of intentionality” that fueled the entire phenomenological tradition. It is striking that despite the different solutions they offer, these two approaches have the same critical orientation regarding phenomenology (they characterize intentionality by its failure to ensure its own foundation), and they have the task of testing phenomenology in a confrontation with its various outsides such as “Invisible”, “Totality”, “Affectivity” or “Le visage” which escape the Husserlian concept of experience determined by the consciousness and its correlative noetic-noematic structure. This pathos of thought which is proper to the French phenomenology wants to go further than what remains unquestioned in Husserl (presence determined in the solid figures of intuition and objectness), and in Heidegger (presence determined as phenomenon of being). This new phenomenological movement reorganize and revise the method of classic phenomenology and deal with a certain experience of “hyper-phenomenon” or “counter-phenomenon” which is an event of appearing that establishes itself by itself.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Intentionality,Givenness,Phenomenon,Michel Henry,Merleau-Ponty

Kaynakça

BARBARAS, Renaud (2006) Desire and Distance Introduction to a Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Paul B. Milan, California: Stanford University Press.
BOEHM, Rudolf (1959) “Les ambiguïtés des concepts husserliens d’immanence et de transcendance”, Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, vol 149, pp. 481-527.
HENRY, Michel (2015) “Material Phenomenology”, The Quiet Powers of the Possible Interviews in Contemporary French Phenomenology, edited by Tarek R. Dika and W. Chris Hackett, foreword by Richard Kearney, New York: Fordham University Press.
HENRY, Michel (1963) L’essence de la manifestation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
HUSSERL, Edmund (1964) Leçons pour une phénoménologie de la conscience intime du temps, translated by. Henri Dussot, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
HUSSERL, Edmund (1970a) Cartesian Meditations, translated by Dorion Cairns, The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
HUSSERL, Edmund (1970b) Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, translated by David Carr, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
HUSSERL, Edmund (1962) Ideas I: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson, New York: Collier.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Emre Şan
İSTANBUL 29 MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, FELSEFE BÖLÜMÜ
0000-0003-2654-9707

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Ekim 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Ekim 2017

Kabul Tarihi

18 Eylül 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Sayı: 29

DOI

https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.342182

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA88JH99RT

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Şan, E. (2017). Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 29, 65-81. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.342182

AMA

1.Şan E. Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty. Kaygı. 2017;(29):65-81. doi:10.20981/kaygi.342182

Chicago

Şan, Emre. 2017. “Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy 29: 65-81. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.342182.

EndNote

Şan E (01 Ekim 2017) Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 29 65–81.

IEEE

[1]E. Şan, “Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty”, Kaygı, sy 29, ss. 65–81, Eki. 2017, doi: 10.20981/kaygi.342182.

ISNAD

Şan, Emre. “Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi. 29 (01 Ekim 2017): 65-81. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.342182.

JAMA

1.Şan E. Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty. Kaygı. 2017;:65–81.

MLA

Şan, Emre. “Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy 29, Ekim 2017, ss. 65-81, doi:10.20981/kaygi.342182.

Vancouver

1.Emre Şan. Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty. Kaygı. 01 Ekim 2017;(29):65-81. doi:10.20981/kaygi.342182

Cited By

https://doi.org/

Fenomenolojinin Sanat Felsefesindeki Temsili: Göz ve Tin

Medya ve Kültür

https://doi.org/10.60077/medkul.1676394