TÜRK SIĞINMACILARIN TÖRE CİNAYETİ SEBEBİYLE BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK’A SIĞINMA BAŞVURULARI VE SIĞINMADA CİNSİYET BOŞLUĞU

Abstract

TÜRK SIĞINMACILARIN TÖRE CİNAYETİ SEBEBİYLE BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK’A SIĞINMA BAŞVURULARI VE SIĞINMADA CİNSİYET BOŞLUĞU

Öz

Mültecilerin Hukuki Durumuna Dair Cenevre Sözleşmesi, mülteciye dair basit bir tanım sunar ve sorun da töre cinayeti gibi ciddi insan hakkı ihlali olan durumların, bu Sözleşmede meşru olarak mülteci tanıması sağlayacak temellerden birine dâhil edilemediği durumlarda ortaya çıkar. Töre cinayetleri genellikle özel ya da aile içi bir durum olarak görülmüştür ve mevcut tanımlar ile Cenevre Sözleşmesi’nin yorumu içinde cinsiyete dayalı zulmün tanınması önündeki engel de, bu zulmün yapıldığı “Üçüncü Dünya” ülkelerinin kültürel farklılıkları olduğu görüşüdür. Birleşik Krallık, sığınma talebinin temeli olan töre cinayeti sebebiyle korkuyu “belli bir toplumsal gruba mensubiyet” kriterine göre değerlendirir. Ancak “belli bir toplumsal gruba mensubiyet” i yorumlamak için yargı mercilerince kullanılan metotlar, töre cinayetlerine dayalı sığınma taleplerinin yargılamasını olumsuz etkileyen ve tutarsız hükümlere ve adil olmayan farklılıklara yol açan bir uygulama birliğinin eksikliğini ortaya koymaktadır

Kaynakça

1. Kitaplar A.A.Mansour, 1982, ‘Hudud crimes’, in M. C. Bassiouni (ed.) The Islamic crimi- nal justice system, Oceana Publ., 195-201, 197-200.
2. ADIMA. “Guidelines on gender issues for decision-makers (Australia) July 1996
3. Appendix 4/ 4.10-Possible Persecution by violation of thought, conscience and religion”. ADIMA Guidelines on Gender Issues for decision-makers-Australia/1996.
4. Bhabha J, 1993, Legal problems of women refugees, Women; A Cultural Revi- ew vol 4, no 3, pp 240-249.
5. Bunch, 1990, Human Rights Quarterly, Women’s Rights as Human Rights, To- ward a Re-vision of Human Rights, Humanitarian Rights Quarterly vol 12, no 4, pp.486-498.
6. CIRB Guidelines on “Women Refugee Claimants Fearing gender-related perse- cution”: Canada, November 1996 III/1.
7. Collinson S ,1993, Beyond Borders: Western Europe Migration Policy Towards the 21st Century, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
8. Cook, R. J.1994, ‘State accountability under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women’, in Human Rights of Women

9. National and International Perspectives, R.J. Cook (ed.), University of Penns- ylvania Press, p. 228-256. Crawley, Heaven. 2001. Refugees and Gender: Law and Process. 2nd ed. Bris- tol, UK: Jordan Publishing Limited in association with Refugee Women’s Legal Group (RWLG).
10. Copelon, R ,1994, Surfacing gender; re-engraving crimes against women in humanitarian law, Hastings Women’s Law Journal vol 5, no 2, pp 243-266.
11. Donnelly, Jack, 1998, International Human Rights ,Westview Press.
12. Erturk, Yakin, 2009-UNHCR-Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences-www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/SRWomen/
13. Pages/SRWomenIndex.aspx. Geraldine Bedell, 2004,Death before Dishonour, OBSERVER, Nov. 21, 2004, html.
14. Goodwin-Gill and McAdam, 2007, The Refugee In International Law, Oxford Publication.
15. Ilkkaracan 1998; Turk Hukuk Sitesi 2004 ed. Istanbul: Women for Women’s Rights.
16. Kelly, N, 1994, Guideliness for women’s asylum claims of women, Cornell In- ternational Law Journal vol 26, no 3, p 625-674.
17. Lindsey Devers, Sarah Bacon, 2010, Interpreting Honour Crimes: The Instituti- onal Disregard Towards Female Victims of Family Violence in the Middle East
18. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory. Macdonald I. QC and Toal R.2008, Macdonalds’s Immigration Law & Practice , th Edition, London: LexisNexis, p. 847.
19. Macklin, A ,1995, Refugee women and the imperative of categories, Human
20. Rights Quarterly vol 17, pp. 213-277. Mayell, Hillary, 2008-02-08 “Thousands of Women Killed for Family “Honor”. National Geographic.
21. Maxine Molyneux and Shahra Razavi. 2003, Democracy, Governance and Hu- man Rights. Programme Paper Number 10.Gendered Justice, Development and Rights.
22. Prochazka, 2012, There is no honour in honour killings: why women at risk for defying socio-sexual norms must be considered a ‘particular social group’’ under asylum law 34-02-445.
23. Rao, A. 1995, The Politics of gender and culture in International Human Rights
24. Discourse, international feminist perspective, New York, Routledge. Recommendation Rec(2004)9 of the Committee of Ministers to Member Sta- tes on the Concept of “Membership of a Particular Social Group” (MPSG) in the Context of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees.
25. RWLG Gender Guidelines for the Determination of Asylum claims in the UK- / 4.17). Shacknove A ,1985, ‘Who is a Refugee?’ in Ethics, Vol. 95, No. 2 (Jan., 1985), pp. 274-284 Published by: The University of Chicago Press.
26. Sikora, Damien W., 2001, Differing Cultures, differing culpabilities? A sensib- le alternative, using cultural circumstances as mitigating factor in sentencing. Vol.62:1695.
27. Spatz, M.2001,, ‘A “lesser” crime: a comparative study of legal defences for men who kill their wives’, 24 Colum. J .L. & Soc. Probs, 597.
28. Spijkerboer, T (1994) Women and Refugee Status; Beyond the Public/Private
29. Distinction (Emancipation Council, The Hague). Yahyaoui Krivenko E., 2010, `Muslim women’s claims to refugee status within the context of child custody upon divorce under Islamic Law ́, in International
30. Journal of Refugee Law , 22(1), p. 49. Yuval-Davis, Nira (1995) ‘Women, Ethnicity and Empowerment’. Special issue on ‘Shifting Identities, Shifting Racisms’, in K. Bhavnani and A. Phoenix (eds)
31. Feminism and Psychology 4, 1: 179-98. İnternet Siteleri Amnesty International, “Pakistan: Honour Killings of Women and Girls,” http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ASA33/018/1999 Accessed 28 Octo- ber 2013.
32. United Nations High Commission of Refugees, “UNHCR Guidance Note on Re- fugee Claims Relating to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity” http://www. refworld.org/docid/48abd5660.html Accessed 28 October 2013.
33. United Nations High Commission of Refugees, “UNHCR Handbook for the pro- tection of women and girls (2002) Provisional release for the consultation pur- poses.” www.un.org/.../unhcr_handbook_for _the_protection_of_women_ and_girls.pdf. Accessed 01 November 2013 .
34. The 1951 Geneva Convention relating to the Status of refugees and its 1967
35. Protocol, http://www.unhcr.org/4ec262df9.html Accessed 03 November 2013.
36. Refugee Women’s Resource Project Asylum Aid, 2005. Accessed 01 November http://www.asylumaid.org.uk/publications.php?category=2&search=Sea rch&page=7 Refugee Women’s Resource Project Asylum Aid, 2005 Accessed 03 November 2013.
37. Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, “Compendium of Decisions: Gui- deline 4 - Women Refugee Claimants Fearing Gender-Related Persecution (Up- date),” (February 2003) http://www.refworld.org/docid/4713831e2.html. Ac- cessed 1 November 2013.
38. United States Department of State. “Country Reports on Human Rights Practi- ces 2010 - Turkey” http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2010/eur/154455.htm Accessed 03 November 2013.
39. Guardian weekly 23 August 2007, United Kingdom ‘’When wrong boyfriends or clothes lead daughters to kill themselves Families in Turkey accused of for- cing young women to take their own lives’’ http://www.theguardian.com/ world/2007/aug/23/turkey.gender Accessed 03 November 2013.
40. Recommendation Rec(2004)9 of the Committee of Ministers to Member Sta- tes on the Concept of “Membership of a Particular Social Group” (MPSG) in the Context of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees-30 June /9
41. ON” 4278d1524,0.html Accessed 03 November 2013.
42. United Nations High Commission of Refugees “Sexual Orientation and gender identity in International Human Rights Law:” UNHCR Guidance Note on Refugee Claims Relating to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, II, B. para 14. Acces- sed 03 November 2013.
43. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, “Working towards the elimination of crimes against women committed in the name of honour” Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Accessed 03 No- vember 2013.
44. Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs “Refugee and Humani- tarian visa Applicants” July 1996-cgrs.uchastings.edu/documents/legal/guideli- nes_aust.pdf Accessed 03 November 2013.
45. The Guardian, Afif Sarhan in Basra and Caroline Davies-The Observer, Sunday May 2008 ‘’Her crime was to fall in love. She paid with her life’’ http://www. theguardian.com/world/2008/apr/27/iraq.military1 Accessed 03 November
46. United Nations High Commission of Refugees, Guidelines on International Pro- tection Guidelines on International Protection No. 2: “Membership of a Parti- cular Social group” within the context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or its 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (HCR/GIP/02/02) Ac- cessed 03 November 2013 .
47. The Supreme Court of Canada in Attorney general v. Ward [1993] 2 S.C.R. 689, para. 57 (Can.).
48. United Kingdom Asylum and Immigration Tribunal MS(Risk-Homosexual)Tur- key CG(2002)UKIAT 05654-Sever.
49. United Kingdom Asylum and Immigration Tribunal YK(PSG-Women) Turkey CG(2002)UKIAT 55491-Kircicek.
50. United States Asylum Tribunal Yaylacicegi v. Gonzales, US. 175 F. App’x 33, 34 (7th Cir. 2006).
51. New Zealand Refugee Status Appeals Authority Auckland Refugee Appeal No: / 11 September 2008.
52. The Supreme Court of the State of Hawai, People v. Chen Lu case, SCWC 12- The Supreme Court of Victoria Australia R v. Dincer.[1983] vr 460.
53. Judgments, Islam (A.P.)v. secretary of state for the home department Regi- na immigration Appeal Tribunal and another ex Parte Shah. Conjoined Appe- als[1997] Imm.A.R. 145.
54. Auckland, New Zealand. Appeal no 2039/93 REMN 12 February 96.
55. Velasquez Rodriguez Case, Judgment of July 29, 1988, Inter-Am.Ct.H.R. (Ser. C) No. 4 (1988).
56. Swedish verdict’, 6 NORA 2 [1998], 89.-Elden A. case Nora: Nordic Journal of
57. Women’s Studies, 6(2), 89-96. George, L. (2006).